<blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Paco</i>
<br /><blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by leadmagnet</i>
<br />I like this one better...
http://www.wtc7.net/videos.htmlThe government attributes the manner in which it fell to the fires. Cough, cough.
Funny thing is, a burning skyscrapper (and there has been plenty of them) has never folded like that due to a fire in the past. Hmmmm.
Curiouser and curiouser!
'Where shall I begin, please your Majesty?' He asked. 'Begin at the beginning,' the King said, very gravely, 'and go on till you come to the end: then stop.'
Lead
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
ANY structural engineer will tell you that those buildings were made to fall EXACTLY like they did. Why are they engineered that way? If they topple over instead of collapse, imagine how many other buildings are in close proximity. The buildings did exactly what they were supposed to under the circumstances. Great engineering.
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
I see, Paco. And NO other building has ever collapsed in that manner absent controlled demolitions. Like the other poster said, must have been from the little jet fuel that made it from the explosions in the other two towers, huh? Lol.
Uhhhh, yeah. Okie dokie.
Lead