« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 64 65 [66] 67 68 ... 74

Author Topic: Weapon Photos Discussion  (Read 561334 times)

Offline XavierMace

  • Site Admin
  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (+16)
  • Major General
  • *****
  • Posts: 2906
    • View Profile
    • http://www.xaviermace.com
Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
« Reply #975 on: August 03, 2009, 09:43:50 PM »
They are really nice for the price.  I have a full review posted here if you are interested: http://www.airsoftretreat.com/reviews/showproduct.php?product=329

I personally don't care for the looks of the particular model I got, but that's what they sent.  The gun was shooting nice and smooth out of the box.  A bit low for outdoor games, but perfect for CQBAZ.  I think Darkhold used it down there on Saturday.  The receiver has no flex at all and if it wasn't for the light weight, you would forget you were playing with a plastic receiver gun.  There's no creaks or wobbles at all.  Same goes for the ICS Sportline I just got in.  The plastics look nearly identical between the two.

I personally find the crane stock included on my model a bit tedious to swap out batteries but it's an otherwise excellent gun for the price.  Just keep in mind, ASGI is often a bit backlogged on builds unless they have the model you want laying around.  Motor might slightly be on the weak side but other than that no complaints.

Just be prepared, the gun ships in absolute bare minimum packaging to save costs.  No fancy pictures or foam, just a plastic tray and cardboard cover.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline dirtnapper73

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sergeant
  • *****
  • Posts: 113
    • View Profile
Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
« Reply #976 on: August 03, 2009, 09:57:07 PM »
Quote from: "Bully Dog Airsoft"
A friend had a flaming hog, they are pretty cool for mid lvl players.  :D
Cool thanks, I have a few higher end guns but im just looking for a cheap cqb m4 style gun, and think that might be it, or i could go for the G&G cqb H.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline DMAN007

  • Trade Count: (+8)
  • Captain
  • *****
  • Posts: 920
    • View Profile
Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
« Reply #977 on: August 29, 2009, 12:11:47 PM »
Xavier, how do you like your Dboy Kac PDW? I love the look and feel of this gun and want to get one. I just haven't had the chance to use or see one in action.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline XavierMace

  • Site Admin
  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (+16)
  • Major General
  • *****
  • Posts: 2906
    • View Profile
    • http://www.xaviermace.com
Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
« Reply #978 on: August 29, 2009, 02:22:58 PM »
It's a POS.  Even by ACM standards, it's QC standards are horrible.  Internally, it's like you just got whatever they had laying around.  Some people got a metal hopup, some got a clear plastic one.  Some got a metal sector chip, some got a plastic one.  Most people's stock's don't lock in the folding position.  The spring is completely random.  The motor sucks.  Accuracy sucks.  Mine requires a rather firm whack to ensure the mag is locked in regardless of mag used.

Even people who have gotten a "good" one, still replaced half the internal parts.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Bully Dog Airsoft

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Master Sergeant
  • *****
  • Posts: 421
    • View Profile
    • http://www.bullydogairsoftgrenades.webs.com
Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
« Reply #979 on: August 29, 2009, 06:26:01 PM »
That’s why I am going to go with a different SPR haha I heard that d boys had flaws like that. My friend john ordered a scar from them and sent it back because the motor gears were stripped and the hop up was the same clear plastic that you were talking about! He now has an Echo 1 G36 haha.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged
Image Hosting
                        [size=150]Keny BDAS 2011 Gunman/EOD[/size]

Offline Sykinder

  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Sergeant First Class
  • *****
  • Posts: 267
    • View Profile
Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
« Reply #980 on: August 31, 2009, 05:34:59 PM »
Damn the AK mag long enough?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Bully Dog Airsoft

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Master Sergeant
  • *****
  • Posts: 421
    • View Profile
    • http://www.bullydogairsoftgrenades.webs.com
Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
« Reply #981 on: September 02, 2009, 12:16:21 PM »
Can't belive it is finally finished! Machined this with my uncles help in machining class. First one ever for We-Tech gas pistols haha check out my thread in gas guns, by tomorrow or friday I should have a video. And no it's not brass. Anyways here it is tell me what you think!  [smilie=armata_pdt_06.gif]  


Image Hosting

Image Hosting

Image Hosting
« Last Edit: September 02, 2009, 08:58:49 PM by Bully Dog Airsoft »
Logged
Image Hosting
                        [size=150]Keny BDAS 2011 Gunman/EOD[/size]

Offline DMAN007

  • Trade Count: (+8)
  • Captain
  • *****
  • Posts: 920
    • View Profile
Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
« Reply #982 on: September 02, 2009, 08:07:49 PM »
Nice work, how many rounds does it hold? it looks like a little over 50... but what exactly did you machine ot out of? just curious :roll:
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Bully Dog Airsoft

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Master Sergeant
  • *****
  • Posts: 421
    • View Profile
    • http://www.bullydogairsoftgrenades.webs.com
Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
« Reply #983 on: September 02, 2009, 08:55:26 PM »
T-66 aircraft aluminum, it has a gold coating on it to increase durability haha, and to think about three weeks ago this was just a piece of solid stock aluminum haha, BTW It holds exactly 47 max. I was hoping to have and even number like 50 but hell I'll take it haha, just waiting for the silicone to dry and I'll take her out for a test spin haha. I'll post a youtube video on the thread I have for this in gas powered guns before friday.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged
Image Hosting
                        [size=150]Keny BDAS 2011 Gunman/EOD[/size]

Offline Bully Dog Airsoft

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Master Sergeant
  • *****
  • Posts: 421
    • View Profile
    • http://www.bullydogairsoftgrenades.webs.com
Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
« Reply #984 on: September 18, 2009, 12:55:14 AM »
My New A&K SPR MOD 0, Upgraded 450fps, systema magnum, M130, ect... With Custom built Kill Cam. I'll have some vids of the kill cam by monday.

  Image Hosting

Image Hosting

Image Hosting

Image Hosting
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged
Image Hosting
                        [size=150]Keny BDAS 2011 Gunman/EOD[/size]

Offline XavierMace

  • Site Admin
  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (+16)
  • Major General
  • *****
  • Posts: 2906
    • View Profile
    • http://www.xaviermace.com
Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
« Reply #985 on: September 18, 2009, 03:18:24 AM »
What possible purpose does that "killcam" serve?  The video mode on a Powershot A530 is hardly suitable for "action" scenes.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Bully Dog Airsoft

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Master Sergeant
  • *****
  • Posts: 421
    • View Profile
    • http://www.bullydogairsoftgrenades.webs.com
Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
« Reply #986 on: September 18, 2009, 08:54:19 AM »
Thats not a cannon, and it takes pretty good video for what it is. And also It will be video from the kill cam not my cannon your right it does not take good video AT ALL! I have a 8mp with HQ video on it right now.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged
Image Hosting
                        [size=150]Keny BDAS 2011 Gunman/EOD[/size]

Offline Exarach

  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Brigadier General
  • *****
  • Posts: 1769
    • View Profile
Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
« Reply #987 on: September 18, 2009, 09:27:28 AM »
Quote from: "Bully Dog Airsoft"
Thats not a cannon, and it takes pretty good video for what it is. And also It will be video from the kill cam not my cannon your right it does not take good video AT ALL! I have a 8mp with HQ video on it right now.
Just an FYI, I give that camera a 5 minute survival rate, thats being generous. Its a HUGE OBVIOUS target, and while I am totally for the recording and viewing of airsoft footage, that camera is going to shake like a strippers ass on the front of that rifle where it is, rending all but a little of that footage useless. It also crosses 3 of your major target ares if you hold the gun correctly, and interferes with line of sight, are cameras a good idea? Yep. Is that camera a good idea? No......
Your going to get one of those videos similar to the ones kids shoot into the air on a rocket, if your camera survives at all. Just my .02.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged
\"Friendly fire isn\'t\"
If a speeding pellet in a quiet woods hits a noob in the face, and he cries, does anyone care?

Offline Bully Dog Airsoft

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Master Sergeant
  • *****
  • Posts: 421
    • View Profile
    • http://www.bullydogairsoftgrenades.webs.com
Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
« Reply #988 on: September 18, 2009, 09:31:46 AM »
Your right wich is why I decided to reinforce the mount and use my husky 8mp hevy duty camera.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged
Image Hosting
                        [size=150]Keny BDAS 2011 Gunman/EOD[/size]

Offline Rogue Fox

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • First Lieutenant
  • *****
  • Posts: 891
  • 6CA
    • View Profile
Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
« Reply #989 on: September 21, 2009, 08:05:37 PM »
How does that Sten shoot Xavier? Ive always loved the look of them, did AGM decide to adopt another mag or does it have its own mag type?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

When the shit hits the fan, dont be in front of the fan.
Pages: 1 ... 64 65 [66] 67 68 ... 74
« previous next »