Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Black Fox

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 7
1
AEG's / Re: Echo 1 M240
« on: March 07, 2011, 03:28:19 AM »
Quote from: "Renengan"
looks cool... but i wouldnt want to be lugging that thing around on the field, unless of coarse i mount it on a vehicle... and i agree its pretty damn expensive. i would just go with a SAW since they are a hell of a lot lighter.

Renegan, you mean like this.  [smilie=armata_pdt_12.gif]

2
AEG's / Re: Echo 1 M240
« on: March 07, 2011, 03:23:16 AM »
From what I have seen, it's an exact copy of the Trigger Happy including the ammo box.  Fucking A!  Now I can buy spare parts for my Trigger Happy M240 if I need to.

A friend of mine went to the Shot show and got to handle it.  He said visually the quality of the Echo M240 is not quite as nice as the TH M240 but still pretty good.  It also seems to be a few pounds heavier too.  But with a price tag of $750, who cares.

The biggest question though is will Echo-1 provided spare parts and accessories for it?  Mainly, will they sell spare ammo boxes.  This is the guns biggest weak point.  The frame that connect that ammo box to the gun is not very sturdy and can bend or break if you whack it into a rock, snag it into a big branch or take a fall.  Trigger Happy didn't provided squat as far as customer support goes.  And for that, I give them the one finger salute!  My guess is that Echo-1 will.  If so, they'll have my support.

3
AEG's / Re: CA vs. Echo1 M249s
« on: March 07, 2011, 02:48:39 AM »
If you have the money.  Get the CA.  Mine has been a solid performer.  Also, I frequently see used A&K and Echo M249 for sale but rarely a CA.  That should tell you something.

4
AEG's / Re: ECHO 1 M249 MKII vs. Para
« on: November 29, 2010, 01:40:56 AM »
Here is a basic break down from an airsoft perspective that you are looking for.  Some of it has already been said but I thought I would condense it all into one place.

Barrel Length
In general, a longer barrel provides better range and accuracy than a shorter barrel.  Of course there are exceptions to the rule.  It all depends on how your gun is modified.

Gun Length
Shorter guns are easier to maneuver with (Especially when exiting from inside a vehicle).  Some versions like the Para can actually be heavier though.  Full length guns tend to be visually more intimidating.

Stocks
A full length stock allows you to carry a large battery.  This can be very important for a SAW gunner, especially in a large game.  Para style SAWs are forced to use smaller batteries in the front grip which generally have half the capacity of a battery that can be used in a full stock.  Also, by having the battery in the stock gives you better gun balance.  The Mk-II stock is also more comfortable when shouldering (Unless you have short arms) or in the prone position.  Short stocks tend to be an advantage in thick bush, buildings and exiting vehicles.  Also, you can usually shoulder a SAW for a bit longer since you can pull in it to your shoulder and support it better.  This may very depending on how long the users arms are.

Battery
One exception to the battery is that in most M249s, you have the option of placing the battery in your ammo box.  In most versions such as the Echo-1, A&K and Classic Army, it requires you to run wires from your ammo box to your gun.  The Pro on this is it allows you to carry a very large battery like the Mk-II but still have a compact gun.  Also by having the battery in the ammo box it provides better weight distribution.  The Con for this type of set up is if you only have one of these ammo box and it goes down, your done for the day unless you want to hump another big box mag as a back-up.  By having your battery in the stock or front grips, you can uses M-4 Hi-Caps as back up or you can use a nut sack.

Ammo Box
Most LMGs/SAWs, you only have one choice in ammo boxes.  The M249 and a few other you have several choices.  In the case of the M249, you have the large ammo box (2,500~4,000 rnds) and the (medium) nut sack (1,500~2,500 rnds).  The differences are obvious.  The large ammo boxes allows you to carry more firepower but is bulky and heavier (due to the weight of the BBs).  The nut sack smaller size allows you to move lighter with more maneuverability but at reduced ammo capacity.  As you already know you can use the M-4 Hi-Cap as well.  I usually carry a few as an emergency back-up should my box mags go down.

Below are pictures of several variation to make it easier to compare.  The bottom 3 pics are my gun.  The bottom pic is my current version.  I call it a Mk-II Mod-2.  I went with this version because I wanted a long barrel for better range and accuracy but still wanted an adjustable stock.  My arms are a tad on the short side and the full stock made it difficult to shoulder for a long period of time.  The G&P Improved Collapsible Butt Stock allows me to shorten it when shouldering but extend it when in the prone.  This forced me to move the battery in the front underneath the barrel.  I was able to combine two 7.4 1,400 mAh LiPo batteries to give me a total of 2,800 mAh which is usually more than enough for one day, unless you're playing in a large game.  The only disadvantage is with the RIS there is no quick battery change and I have to carry an Allen wrench with me to be able to access the battery.

Ultimately, it all depends on what you like.

Two thing I do strongly recommend.  One, invest in a good padded SAW sling.  It will greatly reduce the fatigue of carrying one around for any long period of time.  Two, if you're going to get an M249, get a Classic Army.  Brand wise they make the best ones.


Para Version


Mk-46 MOD-0


First Upgrade
M249 Mk-II MOD-1


Current Configuration
M249 Mk-II MOD-2

5
Reviews / Re: Trigger Happy M240 Review - Updated Oct. 21th 2010
« on: October 21, 2010, 03:45:16 PM »
The video manual for the TH M240 has been added to the bottom of the original review.

Also posted below for your convenience.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pvhOMoTuhw0

6
AEG's / Re: Weapon Photos
« on: August 21, 2010, 02:39:31 PM »
The evolution of my M249.

Original Configuration
Mk-46 MOD-0


First Upgrade
M249 Mk-48 MOD-0


Current Configuration
M249 Mk-48 MOD-1

7
General Airsoft Discussion / Re: Bio-degradable BB issue
« on: August 16, 2010, 01:33:15 AM »
I've used Excel Bio BBs for over 10 years and never had a problem.  They are slightly smaller than your average BBs so your fps may be slightly lower when using them.

However, here is a general rule I use with Bio BBs.  If they claim that they will degrade in less than a year, don't use them.  BBs that degrade too fast loose their round shapes quickly which leads to jamming.  BBs that take longer to degrade can stand-up against the element for a while and will last longer when stored.

8
General Airsoft Discussion / Re: Airsoft Stores in Arizona
« on: July 29, 2010, 12:12:37 PM »
Quote from: "XavierMace"
The only dedicated airsoft store in Arizona is Gearbox Airsoft.  There's a few paintball stores that sell airsoft equipment as well.

Unfortunately they don't have an online store so I can't see what they have.

9
General Airsoft Discussion / Airsoft Stores in Arizona
« on: July 29, 2010, 01:38:19 AM »
Gents

It there a list of airsoft stores in Arizona?  I'm on a buycott mission to support Arizona.

10
AEG's / Re: M249 external question
« on: July 29, 2010, 01:33:31 AM »
I personally like the rail with a grip-pod on the bottom (Get a real one.  Airsoft versions are crap.  You can get them on eBay for around $50).  The only drawback with rails is that you would need to put the battery inside the rails underneath which is not easy to get in and out of.  Or have the battery pack in a PEQ attached to the rail.  If you use the ranger grip you can keep the original cover which is easier to remove and access the battery.

Here is what mines look like.
viewtopic.php?f=5&t=7946&st=0&sk=t&sd=a&start=330
It has since been upgraded with the G&P sliding stock like yours

11
AEG's / Re: Black Fox's Tricks of the Trade - The Golden Secret
« on: June 09, 2010, 12:15:55 PM »
Quote from: "carbon14c"
Quote from: "Ganef"
If I had the funds and the space to do it I would make an Airsoft Mythbusters and prove/disprove various garbage that is being thrown around on the net about airsoft range and energy.

that would be very interesting to see!

and the whole cylender to barrel theory, I thought that was common knowledge? :P

Only to the educated. :D

12
AEG's / Re: Black Fox's Tricks of the Trade - The Golden Secret
« on: June 09, 2010, 10:12:26 AM »
Quote from: "Ganef"
Without hard data from chronograph readings "at-range" and precise distance measurements all of this is hearsay.

There are too many uncontrolled variables involved in making a BB fly efficiently that these things could be maintained as the standard.

Also, the cylinder size chart should be a volumetric table not just a length one. Check out my post here:

viewtopic.php?f=5&t=8208

If I had the funds and the space to do it I would make an Airsoft Mythbusters and prove/disprove various garbage that is being thrown around on the net about airsoft range and energy.

Ganef

I tested this theory myself many years ago and all I can say is that matching the right cylinder with the inner barrel that you are using does make a difference.  Unfortunately whatever data I recorded has long been lost.  Also, the explanation I gave above was given to me from a friend of mine who worked at Systema for many years.  I've been to Systema's factory several times and all I can say about them is when they test a product, a lot of effort goes into it.  If they make a claim that their product improves performance, I believe them.

I absolutely agree with you that having a volumetric chart for the cylinder and inner barrel is the best way to measure which cylinder is best for the type of barrel that you are using.  Unfortunately when it comes to math, calculus was never my forte. Also since volumetric information isn't readily available to your average airsofter, were stuck to just using barrel length.

I also agree with you that there are to many variables involved in making a BB fly efficiently.  The only way I was able to test to see if it worked was to test several types of cylinder on the same gun.  The guns that I tested were G3, M-4 and AK Spetsnaz.  I tested multiple cylinders on each gun.  The gun that had the most dramatic effect was on the Spetsnaz.  I had an M-130 spring and a stock barrel.  When I put a full Type-0 cylinder in it shot around 370 fps.  When I put a Type-3 cylinder in it, it shot nearly 400fps! (With an Excel 0.20g Bio-BB)

Anyway, if I didn't have a wife and two little kids I would like to join you in creating an Airsoft Mythbusters.  That would be fun.

By the way, bore-up cylinders are designed to be used with high power springs M-130 and above or guns with inner barrels that are 550mm +.  Using springs below that you won't see any real added benefit.

13
AEG's / Re: M249 upgrades
« on: June 09, 2010, 12:48:49 AM »
Quote from: "carbon14c"
as far as the original question.. it's a squad automatic weapon, which means you will be putting plenty of rounds down range towards your target.. i would say you should run it stock, dont screw with the gearbox and you wont run the risk of pre-maturely stripping something or some other mishap. obviously it is too late for that, since you have already installed the stronger spring.. echo-1's shoot pretty decent out of the box, use some heavier ammunition if you want more range..

the last game we were at, our saw-man had a magazine mis-hap and ended up having to hike back to the staging area and secure a new rifle. that is inconvenient to say the least

It's always good to have a spare drum mag.  I like the A&K drum mag.  It has a sound activated auto winder that is very nice but it's big.  If you want something more compact, go with a MAG M249 drum mag.

I like to use an 8.4v battery for slower rate of fire.  This allows me to hold the trigger down for longer period of time and conserve ammo.

As for upgrades though, do what you like but make sure you use quality parts and do it right.  Personally, when I get a new gun I strip the internals and replace them with quality parts.  That's just me though.  However, the SAW is not intended to be a precision gun (although you can turn it into one).  It's primary role is suppression.  So if you want to leave it stock, that's fine.

By the way, what kind of spring did you put in it?  There is a way to increase your FPS without having to use a more powerful spring but requires a little skill.  If you're interested in knowing how go to these links.

http://www.airsoftarizona.com/forumbb/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=27103
http://www.airsoftarizona.com/forumbb/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=27629

14
AEG's / Black Fox's Tricks of the Trade - The Golden Secret
« on: June 09, 2010, 12:20:13 AM »
Have you ever noticed that some guys guns just always seems to out gun yours? Or that they always seem to have a bit more sting to them.  There is a reason for it and I’m about to tell you why.  I’ve given some hard though about sharing this trick of the trade.  But since I don’t live in this area I really don’t have to worry about going up against any of your guns.:D  With that in mind I will share with you what I consider is the Golden Secret of the airsoft trick of the trade.

This secret has been around for some time but one that has not really been understood.  Because of that, airsofters in general have not paid much attention to it.  What I am talking about is matching your inner barrel with the proper cylinder to the spring and BB weight you are using.  This combination more than any other upgrade you do to your gun will determine how potent your airsoft gun is.  Done properly, you will maximize the energy and the range of your BB.  In short, you will be able to out gun most people on the field.  Done improperly, your gun will act as an airsoft vampire that will drain or prevent your BB from reaching its maximum energy potential when leaving the barrel.  I’m going to help better understand this aspect of airsoft technology.

Before we start.  First, I want you to go to this link http://www.cobraairsoft.com/default.php?cPath=79_80  and look at the Systema cylinders labeled “Type-0” thru “Type-4” or the Prometheus cylinders labeled “A” thru “F”.  You will see cylinder with holes in different sections of the cylinder (also known as ported cylinders) and some with no holes at all.  What these cylinders do, when matched properly to the inner barrel that you are using, allows the BB to reach it maximum energy potential just as it’s leaving the barrel.  I will give you an example how this work.

Let’s say you have 3 identical M-4 and all of them have a 363mm inner barrel.  The only difference is the cylinder they are using.  Gun-A is using a Systema Type-0 cylinder, Gun-B Type-2 and Gun-C Type-3.  Now let’s say all guns chrono at 400 fps with a 0.20g BB.  Since they all chrono the same, one could conclude that they would all shoot at approximately the same range.  Wrong!  Gun-B would significantly outgun Gun-A & C.  Why is that?  First let’s explore why Guns-A & C doesn’t shoot as far.

Gun-A:  The reason Gun-A doesn’t shoot as far as Gun-B is because the BB is leaving the barrel before it is reaching its full energy potential.  Because the cylinder is so long, it has way more air than the M-4 inner barrel needs.  On top of that, the piston doesn’t reach full speed until just a split second before the piston impact the cylinder head.  Because of this, the BB is pushed out of the barrel before the piston head impacts the cylinder head.  As a result, the remaining air is wasted energy and the BB does not reach its full speed potential because the transfer of energy was not complete.  The reason full cylinders are used on long barrel guns such as an M-16 is because the long barrel gives the BB more time to reach its maximum speed.

Gun-C:  The reason Gun-C doesn’t shoot as far as Gun-B is because it suffers from a vacuum problem.  Since the ports on the cylinder are too far forward.  It does not provide enough air to push the BB out of the barrel which creates a vacuum.  As a result, the BB begins to decelerate before it has even left the barrel!  This means that your gun will be shooting at shorter range than it should be.  This is what I meant earlier about your gun becoming a vampire.  It sucks the energy away from your BB.

Gun-B:  So why does Gun-B shoot the best?  Since it is a medium length inner barrel, it doesn’t need a full length cylinder.  The volume of air after the piston head passes the ported hole provides enough air to push the BB out.  Also, since there is no resistance to the piston on the first 1/2 inch of its stroke, the piston can pick-up speed more quickly.  When is does pass the ported holes, it is hitting the air faster and providing more energy.  What this does is it shoots the BB out of the barrel just a split before the piston head impacts the cylinder head, thus allowing the BB to receive the maximum amount of energy from the spring.  This translates into longer range and better performance over your opponent.  And that's why I call it the “Golden Secret”.

My description for Gun-A was creating some confusion.  For better clarification I've added this.
However, one example that I do remember the details on was a friends Tokyo Marui AK Spetsnaz that I was working on. I had an M-130 spring and a stock barrel (229 mm). When I put a full Systema Type-0 cylinder in it shot around 370 fps. When I put a Type-3 cylinder in it, it shot nearly 400fps. That was almost a 30 fps gain! (With an Excel 0.20g Bio-BB). Now when I asked my friend who worked at Systema about this. His explanation was that if you looked at the Type-3 cylinder. The forward end of the port is almost in the middle of the cylinder. This mean the first half of the piston stroke had very little resistance since the air was bleeding out through the holes. Because of the low resistance, the piston was able to gain more speed and therefore was able to impact the remaining air after the ports at higher velocity which translated to higher fps. He said when a piston travels through a full cylinder, the speed is not the same through the whole stroke. As the piston move closer to the cylinder head it picks-up speed and reaches it's maximum speed just before it completes it's stroke. So when using a full cylinder on a short barrel like the Spetsnaz. The BB has departed the barrel when the piston is only half way through it's stroke. And since the piston has not yet reached full speed. The BB is not receiving the full amount of energy that the spring is capable of providing.

I will say that if someone is using a cylinder that is providing too much air is not as detrimental to a gun that is using a cylinder that does not provide enough air. The one that does not provide enough air causes a vacuum as nears the end of the barrel which slows down the BB. One having to much air is still gaining speed as it travel down the barrel. It just doesn't receive the maximum speed that the spring can provide.



"Mini-Marine"]OK I think I see what you're getting at.

The impression I got (and I believe DMitri as well) was that given the same FPS, the gun with the proper cylinder would get more range.

What you are saying is that with the proper cylinder is more efficient and will grant higher FPS with a given spring, therefore you can achieve cap FPS with a lower power spring, which will in turn result in less wear and tear on the internals.


So how does one select the best cylinder for his gun?  

Before you start, it’s important that you know the length of your inner barrel.  If you do not have a metric measuring tape.  Crusader has provided a fairly extensive list of the length on inner barrel at this link http://www.airsoftpacific.com/viewtopic.php?t=19200

Now when you go to buy a cylinder, some brands like Prometheus, make it relatively easy by stating on the package what barrel length it is designed for.  Other brands like Systema simply state what type of gun its best use for.  But for your convenience, I’ve provided inner barrel measurements for each cylinder.

Now if you happen to have a ported cylinder lying about and you don’t know what type it is.  Here is how you can measure it.  (Note: This method does not work in KM tapered cylinders).   First, if it is attached to a cylinder head, take the cylinder head off.  Now put duct tape on the front end of the cylinder (Make sure it is water tight).  Now put a small piece of duct tape on the front end of the barrel.  Next, fill the inner barrel up with water.  Then hold it over the cylinder and open the tape so that the water empties into the cylinder.  The optimal measurement is that the water from the inner barrel should fill-up about 40% to 50% of the cylinder (45% is ideal in most cases).  Note: if you are using a ported cylinder, you measure from the forward end of the hole and not the entire length of the cylinder.  If the water fills more than 50%, then the cylinder will not provide enough air.  If it’s under 40%, then it will provide too much air.

Now someone may ask why should the cylinder have 50% to 60% more air volume than the cylinder?  This is because the air gets compressed as it is shoved into the inner barrel.

Someone may also ask, why do you give a 10% range in the measurement of the water?  There are several things that can change this equation.  As I mentioned, the volume of air in the inner barrel (represented by water in the explanation above) ideally should equal about 45% of the volume of air in the cylinder.  However, there are several variables that can change this.  The first one is the inner barrel.  You have standard barrels that measure as big as 6.10 mm to tight bore barrels that measure as low as 6.01mm.  So if you are using a super tight bore barrel you may want a little less air in the cylinder and may want to be closer to 50%.  However, if you are using a heavier BB such as a 0.25g, you may want a little bit more air.  The reason is that heavier BB moves more slowly than lighter ones and may need a little more air to push it out.  In this case you may want to lean closer to 60% air volume in the cylinder.

This brings up another point.  When you are trying to optimize your cylinder – barrel combination, it’s always best to test the gun with the BB brand and weight that you normally use in the field.

So how does one know when they have selected the best cylinder for their gun?

If one really wants to know for sure, the best thing I can think of is to buy two different cylinders and try them both.  The one that give you the higher chrono reading is the one that is the most efficient.

Well that about covers it.  If anyone has any questions, let me know.


Here's a list. Different manufacturers.  I will provide measurements for the Systema cylinders later.

Guarder Cylinder ( GE-03-01 ) G3 / M16A2 / AK
Guarder Cylinder ( GE-03-02 ) M4A1 / SR16
Guarder Cylinder ( GE-03-03 ) MP5A Series and SD Series
Guarder Cylinder ( GE-03-04 ) MP5K / PDW

Systema N-B Cylinder Type-0 ( ZS-04-16 ) M16A1 / VN / A2 / G3 / SG550 / AUG
Systema N-B Cylinder Type-1 ( ZS-04-17 ) AK47 / XM177 / SG551
Systema N-B Cylinder Type-2 ( ZS-04-18 ) MP5A4 / A5 / SD5 / SD6 / MC51
Systema N-B Cylinder Type-3 ( ZS-04-19 ) PDW
Systema N-B Cylinder Type-4 ( ZS-04-20 ) MP5K

KM TN Coated Inner Taper Cylinder for Long AEGs ( AEGS10 ) 400mm - 590mm
KM TN Coated Inner Taper Cylinder for Middle AEGs ( AEGS09 ) 200mm - 400mm
KM TN Coated Inner Taper Cylinder for Shorty AEGs ( AEGS08 ) <200mm

Prometheus Stainless Hard Cylinder ( A ) 451 - 550mm
Prometheus Stainless Hard Cylinder ( B ) 401 - 450mm
Prometheus Stainless Hard Cylinder ( C ) 301 - 400mm
Prometheus Stainless Hard Cylinder ( D ) 251 - 300mm
Prometheus Stainless Hard Cylinder ( E ) 201 - 250mm
Prometheus Stainless Hard Cylinder ( F ) 110 - 200mm

TM Full - AK47 / AK47S / M16A1 / M16A2 / M16VN / Sig550 / G3A3 / G3A4 / G3-SG1 / Steyr AUG
TM 1/3 - G36C / P90 / P90 TR / M1A1 Thompson / Sig551 / Sig552 / M4A1 / M4A1 RIS / M4 S-System / SR16 / XM133 / CAR15 / M733 Commando
TM 3/5 - MC51 / G3 SAS / AK Beita Spetsnaz / MP5A4 / MP5A5 / MP5 RAS / MP5SD5 / MP5SD6 / MP5-J
TM 1/2 - MP5K / PDW

15
Reviews / Re: Trigger Happy M240 Review - Updated May 25th 2010
« on: May 27, 2010, 01:01:36 PM »
This Review has been updated.

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 7