Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Whiskey11

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 34
1
AEG's / Re: Question about FPS
« on: August 10, 2010, 02:42:35 PM »
Quote from: "I Slap Fat Kids"
Don't open the gun if you don't need to.  Guns usually seem to begin having issues once they've been fiddled with.

On the note of wanting a lower FPS, the easiest thing you can do is purchase a velocity reducer (I saw one at Gearbox about a week ago).  From what I've heard, it should fit.  I'm not very familiar with outer barrels on MP5's, though.

Why would you ever recommend a velocity reducer to someone?  They DONT work, and never have, they are also not an acceptable way to lower FPS in 99.99% of all airsoft Op's and organizations because they dont work correctly either in full auto or higher FPS in which they can actually fall out or be removed.

And I wasn't raining on your parade, just pointing out the irony of an engineer saying that an airsoft gun (especially a cloned one :P) is impressive lol.  Even 1970's Nuclear tech is better than these airsoft guns :P

2
AEG's / Re: Question about FPS
« on: August 09, 2010, 09:30:16 AM »
Quote from: "BoneMan"
Thanks for the feedback.

The diagnosis is 1 in 4 shots went through the bottom center of the can (.2g)... im guessing im just a hair below 400.  I'll get it chrono'd to be sure.  

For the first time this morning I shot it out in the desert with unlimited range.  Holy smokes... these things are impressive!  As an engineer, I'm pretty impressed what these things can do!  Now I realize why they cost so much.  Far greater range then I imagined.  Granted you can't hit a bullseye at any distance.. but a human sized target.. darn near as far as you want!  This is my favorite new toy by far!   ...wish I could get my wife excited about airsoft... wouldn't that be nice.

You are an engineer, and you are impressed with an airsoft gun?  Wait till you open it, you'll be cursing the ever living shit out of the manufacturers for designing something with such piss poor tolerances.  Even high end guns lack serious tollerances and there isn't much we can do to fix that issue.  I've seen a Classic Army M4 with bushing holes that where so far out of alignment you could visably see the misalignment by putting the two halves next to each other and that was when CA produced worthwhile AEG's...

Don't get me wrong, I'm glad that we have this system, but your adventure with airsoft guns is just beginning.  Wait until you open her up and try and put some upgrades in it and realize that not all of your V2 compatable parts are compatable with your V2 gearbox and then the headaches begin :P

3
Gas Powered Guns / Re: WE SCAR
« on: August 03, 2010, 02:37:30 AM »
Quote from: "XavierMace"
Quote from: "HavHav"
That is the sort of stuff I need to hear. Did the seals just need to be upgraded once with a better ring or what? They only have 30 round magazines, so ROF is irrelevant for the most part to me. Thats really the only downside I've seen so far, unless I'm retarded and there are midcaps out there.

All of WE's GBBR's (and most other GBBR's in general have the same issues).  They shoot far too hot stock (often over 500 on Co2), they use far too much gas which causes cool down), they break far too often (ask Hector about his AGM M4), they are fairly inaccurate.  The KJW M4 with Travis' parts seem to be about the only GBBR around that's achieved any sort of reliability.

However, even then, you are still talking about buying a $400 gun that uses $40 mags and immediately having to upgrade it just so it doesn't blow itself up.

G&P WOC's are about $600, require very little modding for reliability, and shoot about 360 w/ .25's out of the box on Propane/Green Gas.  Mags are the expensive part.

I've since spent far more on my WOC, but she'll be worth it once I get to using her.

Eventually the bolt stop area on the Bolt Carrier will wear out, so will the nozzle tip (and consequently the nozzle too), another 260$ on the RA Tech Steel Bolt + NPAS and aluminum nozzle portion should get you up and running with very little headache.

I also hear that the Viper Tech GBBr's are not horifyingly bad, and should be very reliable (considering there is video of a guy cycling the dang thing for 10 minutes using an HPA rig with only one stoppage which was cured by racking the bolt again) and the price is reasonable too.  

As for the WE Scar?  I've only ever seen three, and all three have the same issues regarding the stock breaking off, which WE supposedly fixed in the newest generations.  They seemed like decent bits of kit, but I never saw one shot at any sort of range so I can't comment on long range performance.

4
AEG's / Re: Battery Question(s)
« on: August 02, 2010, 04:59:22 AM »
Quote from: "SGT. DANGLE"
First of all, no matter what battery you use, wear and tear is always going to take place. Second; 9.6 will increase that wear and tear, but it will only increase it if you're going full automatic (which is what I gathered since you said you wanted increased FPS). It's not the battery that causes the damage, it's the operation of full automatic.

I wouldn't worry about it too much. Internals need to be replaced down the road anyway no matter what and getting a 9.6 is not going to break your gun anytime soon. That of course depends on how frequently you use it. That will ultimately determine the wear on your rifle.
If you want some crazy ROF, then your stock E1 internals will fall apart in no time whatsoever.

I recommend not worrying too much about internals that will eventually need upgrading anyway, get a 9.6 battery and have some fun!

I know this isnt the place to discuss this, but I'm interested in hearing your explanation as to why a system that is cyclic in nature is more harmful on Full Auto than Semi auto when in Semi Auto you have to overcome static friction at startup.  Especially considering current draw of a motor from a battery pack levels off in fully automatic after the first few miliseconds.  The only explanation I could think of was heat build up, but again, you are going to burst more current through a motor at startup from a standstill than maintaining rotation...  If you could please enlighten me via PM, or if the OP approves, in this thread, that'd be great because it's quite the contrary to my actual experience :P

5
AEG's / Re: Battery Question(s)
« on: August 01, 2010, 10:34:04 PM »
Quote from: "XavierMace"
Quote from: "xXmusicimpactXx"
O.O 5000Mah???? Daaayyym haha. Doesn't the 7.2 voltage give you a super slow ROF though?

No because it's a 120a discharge rate on the battery.

Which really means nothing because you could supply it with 10000000 amps and it wouldnt make a damn bit of difference in ROF.  So long as the battery you buy outputs enough current to satisfy the motors need you can't over current a motor.  It's only going to take what it wants, and for 90% of the setups out there, 30-35 amps is more than sufficient, more than that is wasting money on your battery.  

A 7.4v LiPo puts out about as much ROF as an 8.4v Large (at best).  My 7.4v 3000 mAh 15c (thats 45 amps continuous) has a slower ROF than my 8.4v 3500 mAh's, but the trigger response is better because the LiPo actually provides the start up current that the motor wants, where as the 8.4v does not.  However, my 9.6v 4000 mAh battery smokes both the 7.4v and the 8.4v (duhr) in ROF and trigger response.

7.4v LiPo's in the sizes needed for most small applications are slightly dangerous unless you can find one that outputs a decent amount of current you risk continually dropping the voltage below the 3v's per cell ratio which significantly reduces the life of the LiPo.  Even the 11.1v's are dangerous in small applications.  Yeah, sure, you can take that risk if you want because the LiPo's provide so well, but you really need to match the LiPo to the gun in terms of guns needs and lipo output.  At least 30-35 amps but really no more than 45-50 amps.

As to your original question, buying airsoft NiMH and NiCD's is dumb.  The RC Car world is years ahead of airsoft in battery technology, but Airsoft NiMH's are like airsoft LiPo's, a waste of money.  Elite produces some of the best cells for NiMH Chemistries.  Cheap Battery Packs carries a huge selection of suitable NiMH cell sizes made by Elite.  If you are going to buy a new battery pack, check out CBP's and buy a ELITE celled NiMH (if you chose to stay with NiMH), dont even give second glance to airsoft NiMH's they dont cut it.  Especially avoid Intellect, who's QC and cell quality has dropped a TON in recent years, their cells smaller than Sub C suffer from serious voltage droop problems while under load because they have no balls and can't output enough amps to satisfy our motor needs, Elite Cells can and do output enough amps in those same sizes and they are generally cheaper than Intellects and have far better quality control for their cells.

In my opinion the only worthwhile LiPo's are 11.1v and output 35-45 amps continuous.  7.4v's are IMO a waste of time where conventional cell technology provides safe for trigger contact voltages and currents as well as performance.  An 11.1v LiPo should be used with some form of MOSFET, although I know many people who dont.  I didnt and the one I had quickly ate through a set of trigger contacts in my G&G M14.  Why don't I use it now with the MOSFET?  Because the setup I was running would cause the Motor to heat up too quickily for my taste due to Active Braking (really passive braking) that the MOSFET was doing.  The 9.6v 4000 mAh offered a great balance of trigger response and kept heat build up to a minimum.  It's interesting technology for it's size, but they are not the end all battery out there, not by a long shot.

6
Accessories & Gear / Re: Walmart Crossman BBs? Good deal or Crap?
« on: August 01, 2010, 06:41:09 PM »
Quote from: "axisofoil"
crap

This...

I've seen polished injection mold cylinders make their way into Crossman BB's.  Pulled one out of the hop up unit of my team leads M60 when he needed BB's NOW because he forgot to order some... worst idea he ever made.  

If you are that tight up that 45$ (shipped) for 3 bags of Airsoft Elite .20's or other comparable brands, then maybe this isnt the hobby or sport for you.  I can almost guarentee something will go wrong eventually and it will cost you far more than a bag of decent BB's will!

You dont put 87 octane into a drag car and expect it to perform well or perform at all.  Spending money on quality batteries, BB's, foot wear and eye pro are the staples of airsoft spending, cheap out on gear and guns all you want, but decent batteries and BB's will help your gun perform at it's max, good foot wear to keep your feet safe and comfortable and good eye pro to protect the only two eyes you will ever get.

7
AEG's / Re: M14 Upgrades
« on: August 01, 2010, 06:17:31 PM »
Quote from: "Pick"
True I agree there he won't need that strong of a motor. But I would since I was pulling a 150 spring.

If he has the money yeah upgrading internerals is a not always a bad thing.  What your suggesting is great for those on a budget. Maybe its just me but when I buy or plan on a gun I always go overboard on the upgrades. But your G&G gears are better quality than most being more on the higher end

But in the end its his choice on what he gonna do. But what your suggesting is good.

As for me I'm looking at a tanaka m700 ACIS sniper

What I'm suggesting has nothing to do with being on a budget, even though it is a good side effect that you save money.  What I'm saying is to not replace more than is absolute necessary to gain the performance you need.  CA Gears are very solid (one of the few things of theirs I actually dont mind) and it's one of the few things that hasn't changed much in the years they've been producing guns.  Mechanically speaking, I'm going to assume that 75% of airsofters who "do their own upgrades" dont know how to correctly but know how to get it to work.  So from a mechanical standpoint, if the shimming is fine and the gears are solid, then spending extra money on aftermarket gears is fruitless and offers nothing in either reliability or durability.  If anything, changing the gears will cause more headaches as you can't just drop them in and go like you can a piston or a spring or a spring guide.

Don't get me wrong, if you wish to spend the money on new gears when they are not necessary, then by all means go for it, but when folks come to me for upgrades and they are already pulling the "I'm on a budget" card or "How can I do this without spending an arm and a leg" you learn that some parts are more than capable of doing the job without any adverse effects.  

Don't get me wrong, G&G makes great guns, but their gears are pretty soft.  I wouldn't throw them in a gearbox with anything more than an M130, maybe an SP130 spring and expect them to last a long time.  In my opinion the CA gears are probably a bit stronger than the G&G's.  I've never tested them to be completely honest.

I don't mean to belittle anyone who does their own work with my comments, but I've seen tons of work done by people who make that claim and it can be depressing to clean up after ;)

8
AEG's / Re: M14 Upgrades
« on: August 01, 2010, 05:06:05 AM »
Quote from: "Pick"
It is a hit and miss with the masamune brand barrells I have have 3 in the past for different games. If your looking for superior accuracy and take care of your weapons I would suggest a 6.01mm I have had a good one from them as well as a bad one.

As for the M160 motor I love mine it works extremley well in my DMR if your getting it I would suggest a new set of gears from systema or guarder not the high torque ones but a set of standard ones

Why? Unless he plans on pulling a stupid high FPS spring, stock CA's should be fine for the job.  New Piston, yeah probably, new piston head, definetly, G&G's Upgraded cylinder head + piston head + piston kit is great in conjunction with a #14 O-ring and a good O-ring Airnozzle (Aug).  V3 bearing spring guide, the spring you want and be done with it.  Maybe replace the 7mm bushings with better quality bushings, but really much more is overkill.  Electricals should be sorted out too as CA's wiring SUCKS.

Dont replace more than is necessary and save yourself money, especially if the stock parts are more than adequate for the job.  Which, even with my disdain for CA's in general, the stock gears are more than capable for an M130/SP120 spring, heck my stock G&G Gears are more than enough for that :)

9
AEG's / Re: M14 Upgrades
« on: July 31, 2010, 05:11:03 AM »
Quote from: "Henriksenator"
Ok then thank you for the information. But the website doesn't have a tight bore barrel for an M14 for $30. Airsoftgi.com does.

Uhm, well, considering that the G&G/CA M14's use standard barrels, they DO have the Madbull 6.03's for ~35$ which is going to be far better quality than the AirsoftGI barrels, at least in my opinion they are.  I'm sure someone will come on here and explain how they feel that the AirsoftGI's are supperior, whatever, thats not my experience.  

Your money man, buy what you wish, I'm just making suggestions.  Often times you wont be able to get everything you want from the same retailler without making unfortunate compromises.  Definetly not worth it in my opinion.

10
AEG's / Re: M14 Upgrades
« on: July 30, 2010, 02:57:10 PM »
Quote from: "Henriksenator"
How much better is the M160 because I was going to order the items from airsoftgi.com and the M160 is very expensive there.

Thats because everything is very expensive there...

Ehobby Asia has the G&P M160 for 45$ I think. You'll pay a little more in shipping, but at the same time the rest of their stuff is a lot cheaper, and you get an automatic discount for having an account there.  Yes you could use "tim" at AirsoftGI and get 10% off and over 100$ free shipping, but meh.

How much better? Significantly better.  The G&P M140 uses Ferrous magnets, similiar to the TM Motors, but is wound for torque, the G&P M160 uses Neodynium magnets and is wound more for speed but the Neo magnets allow it to very efficiently pull an M160 on stock ratio gears without much effort.  It's a very good motor.  Much better than the 140.

11
AEG's / Re: M14 Upgrades
« on: July 30, 2010, 05:07:00 AM »
Quote from: "Henriksenator"
I think I'm going to get a tight bore barrel, a G&P M140 short motor, and a madbull hop up bucking. Tell me if I should get something different or something more.

G&P M160 Motor > G&P M140 motor in both torque and RPM.  The 160 isnt terribly more expensive and will yeild better results than the 140 will.  

Not a fan of Madbull's hop up buckings but I "hear" the new ones are good.  I'm not the soul source for upgrade parts, but I've always had great luck with my Guarder Black Hop Up rubbers, and have found that G&G Green Hop UP rubbers work extremely well for 400 FPS and lower.

12
AEG's / Re: M14 Upgrades
« on: July 29, 2010, 03:25:59 PM »
Quote from: "sethb7290"
Quote from: "Henriksenator"
I don't know where to get a better hop up though because they are rare.

here's a TM hop up hope it helps.

http://shop.ehobbyasia.com/marui-hop-up-set-m14.html

That wont work.  G&G and CA use AUG hop up units.  Upgrading the stock hop up unit is a waste of time as it's not exactly a horrible hop up unit to begin with.

Tightbore + Hop UP Rubber and H nub/Concave spacer, then spend some time working on compression components to minimize FPS variation as much as possible, then move to improving trigger response which will definetly require a new motor.  MOSFET is always a good idea.

Rails are unnecessary unless you NEED all that rail space to mount stuff, and even then do you really need a PEQ box, light, laser, bipod, 1000 scopes vert grip another bipod, toilets, and swiss army homes attached to the side of your gun?  I dont think so.  PEQ box maybe, light only if doing CQB, scope, done.  Bipod on a Scout length is a bit silly in my opinion as it's meant to be more of a shortened battle rifle to suit the urban environment better, it's not exactly ideal for long range shooting with the shorter barrel.  (not saying it isnt accurate at long range, because it is more than some guns, but the full length will still out shoot the shorter).

13
Troubleshooting / Re: What Could have Caused This?
« on: July 23, 2010, 06:07:29 PM »
Quote from: "TheStenGun"
Quote from: "MLA PRO"
So yesterday i was skirmishing with my gun. Its a KWA M4 with CA wiring. I was using the gun for a few hours, and the last game of the night, this happens. It wasnt acting strange at all before it happened. It was just sudden. My gears made an awful noise then the gun stopped firing. (I was using a King Arms lipo). I go home and open up the gearbox and the anit-reversal latch was broken in half. The anti-reversal latch spring was also de-sprung I guess you could say. (I dont know what to call it.) So what may have caused this?

If nothing else was damaged I would suggest simply replacing the anti-reversal latch with a new one and reassembling the gearbox. I have pulled a heavily bent one out of a gearbox before, so I would think that had I continued to used the gearbox without service it would have snapped like yours.  The latch is a part that is under stress and failure would not indicate that anything else is necessarily wrong; it may just be a defective individual part.

This


I've ran stock ARL's in various guns at varrying power levels above and beyond what guys here have run (Like SP130's and SP150's, etc) and never seen one break.  I've seen one break the spur gear because the tech before me put the ARL in wrong  :roll:   The two ARL's I've seen broken where just piss poor quality (one was a JG, no surprise there) the other was a VFC (Still no surprise there).  If nothing else is broken, replace the ARL, and go to town.  I suggest cleaning out your gearbox grease wise while you are in there to double and tripple check that no metal dust got into the greases!

14
AEG's / Re: ICS Two Piece gearbox
« on: July 23, 2010, 06:03:07 PM »
Quote from: "oldgamefreak"
Quote from: "Whiskey11"
Quote from: "XavierMace"
Won't work.

2.)  Buy a PTW/CTW - Very illogical, not very good platform without some serious tweaking.

Whiskey,

Other than the COST invloved (1000.00 to 1500.00) and a better hopup unit. ($30.00) What SERIOUS tweaking do the PTW's need?

Waterproofing (and dust proofing) internals
Shoddy Motors
Metal Bodies that break
Expensive Magazines that dont always feed correctly (Although I hear the MAG brand ones are much nicer than the PTW ones)
Proprietary and stupid expensive tightbores
Pistons that still strip
Electrostatic Shock discharges can fry the computer system
Hop Up mods

For a gun that is 1000-1500$ I should not have to pay someone else to tweak the hop up, rewind a motor, and pay out my arse for mags, tightbores, and still have a gun that needs it's electronics water and dust proofed to prevent cross connections.

Thats unacceptable, especially considering for 1000-1500$ I could build an AEG that performs better, and has similiar functions sans the bolt stop thing, which, if I want a working bolt stop GBB > PTW/CTW any day of the week.

15
AEG's / Re: ICS Two Piece gearbox
« on: July 23, 2010, 05:24:02 AM »
Quote from: "XavierMace"
Won't work.

At least not without some serious modification and alot of headache.  The lower gearbox fits fine, it's the upper, and securing the stock that become issues.  A little machining would get you a 2 peice gearbox, but you are now left with the issue of attaching the stock to the gun, as in a normal AR it is attached through the rear of the gearbox, then the issue of clearance with the rear buffer retainning portion of the lower receiver when splitting it like a real AR and you'll see why ICS did it the way they did it.

Then the upper rail would need modifying.  What have you accomplished? Nothing that can't already be done using the ICS M4 as a base.  Outer barrels, G&P Delta rings, stocks, you name it, are all compatable, just not the receiver and gearbox halves.

If you want a split gearbox, you are left with few options:
1.)  Buy an ICS - most logical
2.)  Buy a PTW/CTW - Very illogical, not very good platform without some serious tweaking
3.)  Buy a Pro-win - Fat chance, most folks who have them, keep them, and for good reason.

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 34