Airsoft Arizona

Airsoft Hardware => AEG's => Topic started by: azsarge on October 23, 2005, 02:11:44 PM

Title: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: azsarge on October 23, 2005, 02:11:44 PM
This thread is for discussion and comments and the like of the content in the Weapon Photos thread.

---

Very nice work, Paul!

What kind of modifictations were required to get that shotty so short?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Paul D Wog on October 23, 2005, 02:20:56 PM
The most obvious is the shortened barrel. The magazine tube had to be shortened and the barrel brace and end cap moved and epoxied into place.
The forgrip had the middle taken out and renforced to strengthen it.At the rear the stock mount points were removed and covered with a plastic plate, that was sanded to shape.
most of my prototype work like this is done on cheap springers like this. These shottys are two for 20 bucks at JT. The cut down price was right for the cut down job. This could be done with a Maruzen CA870, but it would take a little more time and care. I did this last night between 9:00pm and 2:30 am. I was so tired I had to wait to post until this afternoon.
I'll probably do another one and do step by step photos.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Airsofter1 on October 23, 2005, 02:46:59 PM
Paul, you need to get yourself one of these for it to complete the look - http://www.airsoft-war4.com/photos//200510066105.jpg (http://www.airsoft-war4.com/photos//200510066105.jpg)

Of course it does have kinda of a LSS/MASS look with the mag sticking out.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Gantaliano Hoff on October 23, 2005, 06:57:33 PM
I love that M249 Christian! I've wanted one ever since they came out.

 I hope you're on green on the 29th.  :?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: studdermonkey on October 23, 2005, 09:21:54 PM
Paul, that's just downright awesome.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: PHX COBRA on October 24, 2005, 06:34:25 PM
Not to bad, good work guys.  You going to Park it?  or just guncoat maybe?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: azsarge on October 24, 2005, 06:40:01 PM
Quote from: "PHX COBRA"
Not to bad, good work guys.  You going to Park it?  or just guncoat maybe?


Neither.

It's a chunk of metal that holds a grip on.  The pics I've seen of the "real" ones are just bare metal as well.

Like the other G Grips I've made for M4s, it looks like sh*t but works very well.

My RAS should be here any minute (take your time, UPS MAN - I got something waiting for you!) and that would allow me to use other grips, but I like the ergonomics of this better, especially with that giant plastic BOX under my weapon.  This also allows me to use my bipod.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Victor3 on October 25, 2005, 12:35:35 AM
Very nice C-dog.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Airsofter1 on November 04, 2005, 01:50:30 PM
Thats a good looking SPR you got their bro.  You still gonna put a Crane or Vltor stock on it?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: IcePlatinumSky on November 04, 2005, 02:41:15 PM
Very nice Ganef!!! What was it before it was an SPR, and what are the internals like?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Ganef on November 04, 2005, 02:48:40 PM
Since it was all custom, it was my shorty before I turned it into what it is. Well at least the gearbox was. Now I have my Vltor stock on it right now, because I have not worked out the wiring issue for the full stock yet and I must have some Mahhhs so I can plink in the back yard. The internals are as follows: PDI 180% spring, systema gears, sustema hopup, promethius 6.03mm X 509mm m16A1 barrel that I had to drill out the flash hider to make it fit I have a systema motor in it plus the systema bore up cylinder kit. I need to find a chrono so I can fine tune it before a game so it is legit. The metal body is G&P along with the spr front end. That is a harris bipod, and my carry handle off my AR-15 Hbar. I still need to put the charging handle back in, and get some nice glass for it. Oh and it needs paint....
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: busta_cap on November 23, 2005, 08:52:21 PM
Looks Like you need, or should get some higher scope rings or a mount base. Looks Good though. Perfect colors for this time of year in AZ.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: azsarge on December 13, 2005, 01:21:24 AM
Robby, you might want to put a BUIS on that LE blaster.  

Question.  Why the RIS if there's nothing on it?

Very nice, regardless.

D-Bo, that paintjob will work well.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Ranger_Robby on December 14, 2005, 05:19:34 AM
Thanks C,
I'd would actually like to put a flip up BUIS on her. As for the RIS, I have big hands and prefer the beefier feel of the RIS with rail covers on it, that and it looks so cool. To be honest I dont know any rail accessories out there that I would actually use other then a battery box, but I have the large battery ran through the back and hidden in the hallowed out mag in the mag pouch.

Ganef, I dig the multicam paint job!
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Cheeze_IZ_G00d on December 16, 2005, 06:16:02 AM
Dave, you gonna put a can on there?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: gixser13 on December 16, 2005, 08:22:32 AM
Nice M14, Glad I could help
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: delta_echo on December 16, 2005, 10:20:37 AM
Quote from: "Dust2Dust"
Thanks to Gixser, my M14 is done (the scope was the last thing I needed).



Is that a USGI bipod, or just a repro? And very, very nice. I love M14s.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Dust2Dust on December 16, 2005, 11:51:26 AM
Good question Delta.  I'm 99.9% sure it's a repo, but one of those, you never know things.  Said repo in the ad, but came with a bunch of markings on the box, came in a musty smelling wrapper, and the whole surplus feel.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: azsarge on December 16, 2005, 11:55:47 AM
Quote from: "Dust2Dust"
Good question Delta.  I'm 99.9% sure it's a repo, but one of those, you never know things.  Said repo in the ad, but came with a bunch of markings on the box, came in a musty smelling wrapper, and the whole surplus feel.


That says it right there.  Was there a 13-digit number anywhere on the packaging?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Farslayer on December 16, 2005, 12:06:52 PM
Ganef,

Love your paint jobs...always have.  Is that C-dogs old SPR?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Vince on December 16, 2005, 12:48:45 PM
No, it was mine. Mugen's "friend" has C's old SPR.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: RangerBob on December 23, 2005, 04:01:51 PM
Why'd you swap the old front hand grip you had?
It's creepy (Still cool) looking with what you've done to it...no bipod, m4 stock the batt box..Looks like an M4 on roids.
Which...I guess a 249 kind of is.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: -MAD- SARGE on December 23, 2005, 04:04:32 PM
I've been meaning to ask you, what's with the 100mph tape on the grip?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: azsarge on December 23, 2005, 04:23:32 PM
I swapped the handguards for a RAS to mount the PEQ2, and grip, and a light when needed.  VFGs are a must for anything that isn't bolt action or a pistol.

I took off the bipod to save weight.  I'd never use it anyway.

I have a spare 9V battery in the grip compartment.  The tape helps keep the trap door shut.

The M4 stock is the biggest improvement you can make to the M249 platform.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: busta_cap on December 23, 2005, 05:19:00 PM
NIce gat. I like how you wore it down a little? what did you use? The back(rough) side of a kitchen sponge is great for putting wear on a gun.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: IcePlatinumSky on December 23, 2005, 06:27:07 PM
Several questions????

Where are you housing your battery? If its in the PEQ what kind is it, and what battery are you using? How long does it last, and with whatever FPS you are using?

Is that an aftermarket rail or did it come with the gun?

Where did you get the old front hand grip?

Also Nice modstock!!! However, I still like the retrack stock it came with.

We should rename this thread called "Pimp My Gun"!!!
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: azsarge on December 23, 2005, 06:47:29 PM
Quote from: "IcePlatinumSky"
Several questions????

1.  Where are you housing your battery? If its in the PEQ what kind is it, and what battery are you using? How long does it last, and with whatever FPS you are using?

2.  Is that an aftermarket rail or did it come with the gun?

3.  Where did you get the old front hand grip?

4.  Also Nice modstock!!! However, I still like the retrack stock it came with.

We should rename this thread called "Pimp My Gun"!!!


1.  My battery is in the AN/PEQ.  It is a 1700 mAh 9.6v NiCd and it lasts approximately 1.5 box mags, or 3600 BBs.  I also have a 2400 mAh 9.6v NiMH SAW pack that I'm going to reconfigure as an AN/PEQ pack.  I also have the option of running the battery in the box mag.  

2.  It is a G&G rail from AEX.  80-something dollars.  Unfortunately, The real Knights rail will not work on the airsoft SAW, so I had to get a fake.  The G&G rail is nicely made, all rails are in-1913 spec, and it has a nice durable parkerized finish.

3.  If you mean the Knight's VFG, I had it.  If you mean the front-mounted SAW grip, I made it.

4.  Everyone thinks the Para stock looks cool.  I'm here to tell you that it's less-than-ideal when used practically.  Shitty cheekweld, lack of adjustment, and TWICE the weight of the M4 stock arrangement.  It's the reason the Army is issuing a New 249 stock through RFI.  It's like an M4 stock, but fatter.  I'll get some pics of it up soon.

I also have a Aimpoint Comp M2 replica with GI mount that I use on this beast, but it's on loan to a buddy for awhile.

You guys may think my SAW looks radical, but it's the way most dudes rock their 249.  I've seen several regular infantry dudes with M4 stocks and EOTechs.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: azsarge on January 10, 2006, 01:22:12 PM
Robby, I'd add brown as the third color, although the camo you have there will be effective as is.

Come one, paint the whole gun!  Everybody does it!
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Gantaliano Hoff on January 11, 2006, 10:22:09 AM
Looks pretty good. Did you build it from scratch?It looks like it.

You gonna paint it?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Paul D Wog on January 11, 2006, 02:02:17 PM
Yes.
When it is complete and back together I will post a complete Spec sheet.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Paul D Wog on January 11, 2006, 02:12:58 PM
It normally has an Aimpoint replica. I just threw that on because it was handy for the pics.
I bought that red dot primarily for the mount. Someday I hope to get the real PVS-14 (win a #&@#^ lottery)
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: azsarge on January 11, 2006, 02:15:55 PM
Quote from: "Paul D Wog"
It normally has an Aimpoint replica. I just threw that on because it was handy for the pics.
I bought that red dot primarily for the mount. Someday I hope to get the real TVS-14 (win a #&@#^ lottery)


Gotcha.  If it's a real NOD, it's a PVS-14.  TGS just calls their replicas TVS-14s.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Paul D Wog on January 11, 2006, 02:18:13 PM
It's been a long morning/day/last night............. I was up until 2:00 am working on guns.
Not even my own.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: azsarge on January 11, 2006, 02:20:11 PM
Quote from: "Paul D Wog"
It's been a long morning/day/last night............. I was up until 2:00 am working on guns.
Not even my own.


That's why we love, you Paul! 8)
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: seph6885 on January 16, 2006, 01:39:27 PM
did you have to quote every single picture? to get orange paint off, you paint over it, or go at it with some steel wool and paint thinner, followed by some paint retouching.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: -MAD- SARGE on January 21, 2006, 06:43:29 PM
Very Nice!  Drooling as always. Dave is to gear as you are to airsoft guns. Your like the weapon masta!
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Dust2Dust on January 21, 2006, 09:13:02 PM
Vince, Gather as many pictures together of the guns you've done.  I'm going to get that article done lol.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Farslayer on January 21, 2006, 09:22:48 PM
Wow Paul...that looks soooo sweet!
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Gantaliano Hoff on January 21, 2006, 09:28:02 PM
I think Vincent takes the cake this time man! WOW! That is excellent work!
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: RangerBob on January 21, 2006, 10:14:53 PM
Sick work Grenadier.
Aside from how nice it looks, the dedication to create something like that is over whelming.  

Good job man.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Mugen on January 21, 2006, 10:22:29 PM
Finally got it complete eh Vince.  Good jorb.  You roxors and all that.  You know that out of all the people I met in 2005 you have impressed me the most!
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: m-79_Grenadier on January 22, 2006, 12:49:53 AM
Thanks guys!

It always helps to have the support of your friends to overcome difficult obstacles.

Right now im in the process of drawing up the plans for a regulated co2 powered 57mm recoilless rifle. Its going to be breach loading, and have the advantage of using seperate shells, rather than packing the bbs down the barrel like a potato gun. It will have its own bolt assembly that will be able to accept the shells, which will also have to be made in addition to the weapon. Each shell will be made out of 2in. steel tubing, and about 6in. long, with an aluminum rim at the back so it can be extracted by the bolt. There will be no need to gas up the shells, because the gas is stored in the gun, and upon firing, passes through the shell, and propells the bbs inside, down and out the barrel. Each shell (roughly the size of two soda cand stacked end on end) will be able to accept from 500 up to 1000 bbs each. And with a bunch of them, one after the other, thats alot of bbs. Howlers will also be albe to be loaded in the shells for a realistic "artilary" effect.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Hawk on January 22, 2006, 01:11:25 AM
Great work, as usual. Is it gas powered?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Mugen on January 22, 2006, 10:50:30 AM
Quote from: "Hawk"
Great work, as usual. Is it gas powered?


No dude..he actually crafted a gear box to fit in there..its an AEG sir..a really heavy yet Willis mounted AEG!!!   There is nothing Grenadier cant do with machinery  :shock:
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Gantaliano Hoff on January 22, 2006, 01:38:36 PM
Now you just need a tripod for it. :)
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Farslayer on January 22, 2006, 06:52:22 PM
Quote from: "m-79_Grenadier"
Thanks guys!

It always helps to have the support of your friends to overcome difficult obstacles.

Right now im in the process of drawing up the plans for a regulated co2 powered 57mm recoilless rifle. Its going to be breach loading, and have the advantage of using seperate shells, rather than packing the bbs down the barrel like a potato gun. It will have its own bolt assembly that will be able to accept the shells, which will also have to be made in addition to the weapon. Each shell will be made out of 2in. steel tubing, and about 6in. long, with an aluminum rim at the back so it can be extracted by the bolt. There will be no need to gas up the shells, because the gas is stored in the gun, and upon firing, passes through the shell, and propells the bbs inside, down and out the barrel. Each shell (roughly the size of two soda cand stacked end on end) will be able to accept from 500 up to 1000 bbs each. And with a bunch of them, one after the other, thats alot of bbs. Howlers will also be albe to be loaded in the shells for a realistic "artilary" effect.


You definately have skills...
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Vince on January 25, 2006, 11:00:14 PM
See, here's a guy who does it right the first time.

You can like, sand it off, maybe it will come off with paint thinner...get another one, whatever. I have a Phantom style that I could sell ya that I'm pretty sure'll go on there.

(http://www.del-ton.com/images/brakes_img/phantom_flash.jpg)

PM me if you want it.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: azsarge on January 25, 2006, 11:04:58 PM
Aww, I remember when my heater looked like that.

Check the AEG Optics 101 thead for the "after" pic, absent40
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Farslayer on January 25, 2006, 11:05:41 PM
Nice one Absent...all you have to do is paint it.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: absent40 on January 25, 2006, 11:11:59 PM
ha. give me 2 months and it will be painted.  i hope.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: studdermonkey on January 25, 2006, 11:14:31 PM
2 months? Man.. get some Krylon tomorrow from Ace Hardware!
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: absent40 on January 25, 2006, 11:20:31 PM
I haven't even been able to play with it yet. lemme get my jollies from it.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Farslayer on February 01, 2006, 06:22:38 AM
Quote from: "Brando"
my 2 aegs.  

1. upgraded sr-16
(http://i43.photobucket.com/albums/e355/brando18/DSCN10541.jpg)

2. my new stock tm m14
(http://i43.photobucket.com/albums/e355/brando18/DSCN1055.jpg)

photo of all my guns
(http://i43.photobucket.com/albums/e355/brando18/DSCN1056.jpg)
 tm sr-16 400 fps, tm m14, asp2 sv 500 fps, m870, KSC g19 and g17, WA Marine SOC


That's just wrong........
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Gantaliano Hoff on February 01, 2006, 01:05:34 PM
What's wrong about it? I think it's a pretty sexy collection.

What. ohh, Ian. Are you jealous... ;)
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Raith on February 01, 2006, 01:55:12 PM
Quote from: "Gantaliano Hoff"
What. ohh, Ian. Are you jealous... ;)


Ian?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: gixser13 on February 01, 2006, 02:34:58 PM
BeNN with two N's
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Farslayer on February 01, 2006, 04:15:17 PM
There's absolutely nothing wrong with it...it would be nice to come into the sport with a thousand dollars worth of weapons.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Ganef on February 01, 2006, 06:03:31 PM
Yea, but most of us spend the thousand on one instead of 7.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Brando on February 01, 2006, 06:07:12 PM
I have been builidng all them up over time it hasnt been like in the past 3 months.  I have been collecting them for close to two years.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Farslayer on February 01, 2006, 09:28:56 PM
Okay...okay, Ganef is right...I am jealous.  There...I've said it.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Dust2Dust on February 02, 2006, 06:47:55 AM
Nice, Line 6 makes great products.  I'll put my pedal board up next time I snap shots off :P
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Firehead on February 06, 2006, 04:37:38 AM
Ha. You got the sights off a springer MP7. They are cool sights...too bad they aren't metal :(.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Pryde on February 06, 2006, 05:21:58 AM
Quote from: "Firehead"
Ha. You got the sights off a springer MP7. They are cool sights...too bad they aren't metal :(.


Actually those are the ones that come with the TM AUG.....but I do wish they were metal :cry:
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: SilentDragon on February 07, 2006, 12:04:09 AM
wow... that's quite a collection...
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Firehead on February 08, 2006, 05:09:26 AM
It would make a very good sidearm for a sniper, due to their 50 foot no-kill zone.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Ganef on February 08, 2006, 08:28:25 AM
Nothin like having a sidearm that takes the same mags as your primary.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Mooncruiser on February 08, 2006, 11:17:38 AM
Pryde, -did you bump up the cyclic rate, too?

Chip
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: SilentDragon on February 08, 2006, 12:27:44 PM
Yeah, that project gun looks pretty sweet.  I always thought an M4 would be pretty cool if an almost handheld version was made for it... alot like yours!
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Pryde on February 08, 2006, 10:47:39 PM
Quote from: "SilentDragon"
Yeah, that project gun looks pretty sweet.  I always thought an M4 would be pretty cool if an almost handheld version was made for it... alot like yours!


They actually make 'em allready, but they are expensive....or you can get conversion kits, they call 'em Patriot Pistols.  Q-Project released one if I remember correctly, ran about $800.00 but it does look much better than mine.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Pryde on February 08, 2006, 10:50:33 PM
Quote from: "Mooncruiser"
Pryde, -did you bump up the cyclic rate, too?

Chip



Naw just ran it with a standard stock spring and a 9.6 batt, gives it a great rate of fire allready.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: SilentDragon on February 09, 2006, 12:10:26 PM
Quote from: "Pryde"
Quote from: "SilentDragon"
Yeah, that project gun looks pretty sweet.  I always thought an M4 would be pretty cool if an almost handheld version was made for it... alot like yours!

They actually make 'em allready, but they are expensive....or you can get conversion kits, they call 'em Patriot Pistols.  Q-Project released one if I remember correctly, ran about $800.00 but it does look much better than mine.


Niiice....
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Giland on February 09, 2006, 02:13:47 PM
Didn't John Clark carry one in Clear and Present Danger (the movie)?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: azsarge on February 09, 2006, 03:01:11 PM
I forgot to mention that the Rail covers and Vertical Foregrip are genuine Knight's Armament.

Cheers.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: mohawkdude on February 09, 2006, 06:24:15 PM
m4 stocks on M249's and are gay!
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: azsarge on February 09, 2006, 07:06:43 PM
Quote from: "mohawkdude"
m4 stocks on M249's and are gay!


I have no idea what you just said.

If you were implying that my support weapon is not to your liking, (http://www.getoffthex.com/images/custom/graemlins/flipa.gif).

An M4 stock on a SAW is not a new idea on my part, and it works damn well.
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v648/cagdboy/cool249_2.jpg)
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Vince on February 09, 2006, 07:11:44 PM
He's busy commenting on things above his paygrade.

My negativity is only an outward manifestation of my obvious jealousy.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: azsarge on February 09, 2006, 07:14:52 PM
Quote from: "Vince"
He's busy commenting on things above his paygrade.

My negativity is only an outward manifestation of my obvious jealousy.


Yes Vince, but unlike him, you have my respect and are more than welcome to use this beast on the field of play.

 ;)
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Mooncruiser on February 09, 2006, 07:18:30 PM
Now Sarge, you just need to grow your hair long, tie it with a headband, go shirtless with two bandoleers across your chest, wear a BIG fookin' knife, and yell...

"YO! Do we get to WIN THIS TIME???"

BTW, nice gat.  :?

Chip
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Firehead on February 09, 2006, 08:08:51 PM
PFC Hagen has his finger on the trigger. BAD PRIVATE!!!!! :evil:

C...its a nice gat, but I'm not liking the M4 stock. I suppose I'd have to try it out before I can really make judgement on it.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: SilentDragon on February 09, 2006, 08:14:09 PM
Damn dude, hella nice Support weapon.  I love the realism you added to it, too.  I'd hate to get shot by that thing   :shock:

How does it shoot by the way?  I'm sure it's fires nicely....  

About the M4 stock... hmm... not diggin' it too much either, honestly, but if it's what you like and if it suits you, then more power to you!
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: -MAD- SARGE on February 09, 2006, 08:17:54 PM
I like the M4 stock, It is easier to operate.  And that is what counts to me.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Dust2Dust on February 09, 2006, 09:22:25 PM
nice, I gotta get that done on my wall... just too lazy/cheap/broke to do it right now.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: azsarge on February 10, 2006, 01:13:17 PM
I moved some posts.  Ya'll got out-of-hand.

If you have a problem with that, PM me.

This is a thread to look at and discuss others AEG, within reason.

With regards to my 249:

It works very well for me.  If you do not like it because of the way it looks, I can't help you.  I build my guns for functionality, not to look nice.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: ValhallenAngel on February 10, 2006, 10:40:49 PM
Quote from: "Dust2Dust"
nice, I gotta get that done on my wall... just too lazy/cheap/broke to do it right now.


Help me tech my guns some more and I'll help you do it....

What gun would look nice in place of that mp5?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: m-79_Grenadier on February 10, 2006, 11:56:06 PM
Quote from: "Rocketboy"
Just got my new metal body today...

(http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y94/neubine/IMG_8688.jpg)

Is that a marushin m1? I love the M1 with a passion, and I would have bought an airsoft version if I didnt already own a real one. :)

Also, call me crazy, but is that an m79 I spy behind the spetz?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: AddoAduro on February 11, 2006, 12:06:29 AM
Oh.... crap.... that's beautiful...  What ARE all of those?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: ValhallenAngel on February 11, 2006, 12:30:41 AM
Nice collection, I wish I had the money to expand mine a bit.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Rocketboy on February 11, 2006, 01:33:18 AM
Quote from: "m-79_Grenadier"
Is that a marushin m1? I love the M1 with a passion, and I would have bought an airsoft version if I didnt already own a real one. :)

Yup sold it a while ago though.

Quote from: "m-79_Grenadier"
Also, call me crazy, but is that an m79 I spy behind the spetz?

Yup it's a M79 shortie with a metal long barrel. I cal it "el presidente"

Quote from: "AddoAduro"
Oh.... crap.... that's beautiful...  What ARE all of those?


Well let's start....

From a Year ago:

PSG-1 (for sale)
M24 (sold)
P90 (sold)
Aug w/Phantom Kit (sold)
G36
G36c
STAR UMP (sold)
G3SAS
G17 (sold)
MP5k (for sale)

Current wall:

M1 Garand (sold)
M24 (sold)
AK47 Scorpion
M79 "el presidente"
G3SAS
M14
G36
STAR UMP x 2 (sold / for sale)
G36c (now a K)
M4 S-System
M203
MP5k (for sale)
MP5A5
AK47S (sold)

TSW 40 (sold)
G26 (sold)
G17 (sold)
Para 1911 (sold)
Constrictor (sold)
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: mohawkdude on February 12, 2006, 01:46:11 PM
warlock is that mugens old psg-1
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: warlock on February 12, 2006, 01:58:28 PM
Indeed it is.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: 1trooper, manyweapons on February 12, 2006, 02:08:06 PM
time to pwn you all, ahahah

current armory- 2 m60s
3 TM g3sg1's
1 TM 733
1 Tm p90

last years armory-
TM m733
TM Ak47
CA g36c
ICS mp5a4
ICS mp5sd6
TM p90tr
WA infinity SV 5 in.
nbb usps x 2
shotgun


all guns that teams OPFOR/BOS/FE use have been in my hands and armory at one time or another.

new guns to replace old- star m249, 3rd m60. and box mags for g3's

pics will be added.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: seph6885 on February 12, 2006, 02:37:14 PM
Quote from: warlock

(http://www.thelucky13th.com/incoming/wallofarms.gif) (http://www.thelucky13th.com/incoming/wallofarms.jpg)

what brand ak is that, or did you just paint it/get real wood?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: warlock on February 12, 2006, 02:44:20 PM
It's the JT 70-dollar AK. It's a Marui clone with a full-metal body and a full-plastic gearbox. But you can drop in a Version 3 gearbox, it fits perfectly. A full-metal AK for less than 300 bucks....
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: seph6885 on February 12, 2006, 03:20:36 PM
Quote from: "warlock"
It's the JT 70-dollar AK. It's a Marui clone with a full-metal body and a full-plastic gearbox. But you can drop in a Version 3 gearbox, it fits perfectly. A full-metal AK for less than 300 bucks....


those things have metal bodies?? i had no idea.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: warlock on February 12, 2006, 03:29:05 PM
Quote from: "seph6885"
Quote from: "warlock"
It's the JT 70-dollar AK. It's a Marui clone with a full-metal body and a full-plastic gearbox. But you can drop in a Version 3 gearbox, it fits perfectly. A full-metal AK for less than 300 bucks....

those things have metal bodies?? i had no idea.


Yup! Pretty good deal, basically a full-metal body kit for 70 bucks.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Patty o' Brian on February 18, 2006, 06:10:37 PM
where did you get that gear box warlock? and how much did it cost you?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Firehead on February 18, 2006, 06:21:51 PM
Quote from: "Patty o' Brian"
where did you get that gear box warlock? and how much did it cost you?


He never said he had a version 3 gearbox, you made an assumption. I bet all you cheap bastards(oh no he didn't!!!:cry:) will be all over it as soon as he tells you where if he indeed has one :P .
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: MicrowvbleTurtle on February 20, 2006, 09:20:39 PM
Dave, is that STAR's "new" SOPMOD M14?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: azsarge on February 20, 2006, 09:26:31 PM
How'd you put an ELCAN on a non-railed feedtray cover, Dave?

That new Troy M14 replica looks nice!
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: gixser13 on February 20, 2006, 09:28:29 PM
Its not stars NEW sopmod but yes its a Stars M14

Stars first AEG was the M14 Sopmod it came out about 2 years ago but not for sale in the USA
There just now trickling down from the UK
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: SilentDragon on February 20, 2006, 09:31:37 PM
Don't have pics yet, but don't have much of an armory either.  Just my AK47 (same as mentioned above).... mooncruiser may tell you about it, and Spaz, and a few other guys....  
for $70, its not a bad gun... but the fact that it has a plastic gearbox, identical to the version 3.... makes the power and durability matter an issue.  But of course, you can drop one in, if you can find one.  I havn't had any luck finding one (any more money that goes into my airsoft addiction is going into that gearbox :D), but if anyone knows where i can get one, or knows who is selling one, please let me know!

I AM a cheap bastard, i'm mexican (not to say all mexicans are broke, but you know what i mean, right?  That is why i got that AK.... allthough i should have just bought the M9 first and fought with just that until i saved enough for the AK... a Tokyo Marui AK!!!
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: gixser13 on February 20, 2006, 09:52:52 PM
Quote from: "azsarge"
How'd you put an ELCAN on a non-railed feedtray cover, Dave?

That new Troy M14 replica looks nice!



Lots of super glue,


I used a G3 mount
(http://www.i-gundrosen.com/bilder/softgun/M249/rail1.jpg)
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: -MAD- SARGE on February 20, 2006, 09:58:45 PM
Super Glue is Legit!  8)
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: SilentDragon on February 20, 2006, 10:04:30 PM
Epoxy compound is better though... i would also say more professional.  I fabricated a part of my car using Epoxy, and it is strong as hell!  I HAD to make the part by hand because no parts stores carry it... nor the dealership.  So, i cleaned up the part, got it down to bare metal, and strategically molded a brand new part that works great, and will hold for a long ass time.  Try it out, i'd use the black epoxy for gun use.... pretty cool stuff...

Just mix the same amount of resin and hardener, and with a popsicle stick (or anything similar), gloop that shit where you want it, form it into where you want it, and wipe of the rest.  Lets it sit in the sun, or give it plenty of time to dry off...
if you use it like crazy glue, then one application should be good enough... for those who has worked with epoxy, im sure you know how kick ass it is...
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: gixser13 on February 20, 2006, 10:07:54 PM
I am kidding. I use Fasteners and reinforcement plate on the bottom side
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Wolfan8or on February 21, 2006, 03:43:45 PM
u like nade launchers dont you
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Firehead on February 21, 2006, 03:57:26 PM
Quote from: "Wolfan8or"
u like nade launchers dont you


He doesn't have any "nade" launchers. However, he just happens to have a some "grenade" launchers though.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: azsarge on February 21, 2006, 04:18:17 PM
Quote from: "Firehead"
Quote from: "Wolfan8or"
u like nade launchers dont you

He doesn't have any "nade" launchers. However, he just happens to have a some "grenade" launchers though.

 :)

Looks good, Jeremiah.

Whats the breakdown on the 203s with regards to whats Marui and Gas?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: JoJockAmo on February 21, 2006, 04:32:31 PM
M4 style only gas model. Others are TM 3 round burst (as you know) love those springer with 120' shots
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: SilentDragon on February 21, 2006, 08:00:37 PM
Just wondering, is Jeremiah, or "JoJockAmo," the one from JungleToy?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Ganef on February 21, 2006, 08:47:02 PM
Yes he is.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: gixser13 on February 23, 2006, 08:32:12 AM
Purrty nice Ben
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Firehead on February 23, 2006, 12:22:33 PM
Looks good man, but I still think you should put the front sight post on.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: PHX COBRA on February 23, 2006, 12:27:01 PM
Quote from: "Firehead"
Looks good man, but I still think you should put the front sight post on.


I am going to put on a flip-up front sight, and a rear flip-up BUIS.
Until then I don't feel like putting a front sight tower on.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: azsarge on February 23, 2006, 12:40:07 PM
Quote from: "PHX COBRA"
Quote from: "Firehead"
Looks good man, but I still think you should put the front sight post on.

I am going to put on a flip-up front sight, and a rear flip-up BUIS.
Until then I don't feel like putting a front sight tower on.


Good call.

Looks good, bro!  With a few exceptions, that's how I wanted to build my next AR.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Firehead on February 23, 2006, 01:13:42 PM
Well, there needs to be a gas block on there at least, something similar to mine.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: PHX COBRA on February 23, 2006, 01:21:28 PM
Quote from: "Firehead"
Well, there needs to be a gas block on there at least, something similar to mine.


Thats what ive been thinking, just a low-profile gas block.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Airsofter1 on February 23, 2006, 01:28:54 PM
You could do what I did and cut down the gas block so that it sits inside the rail.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: azsarge on February 23, 2006, 02:34:23 PM
Quote from: "Airsofter1"
You could do what I did and cut down the gas block so that it sits inside the rail.


You don't have a gas block, Mikey.  You cut your front sight post.

Ben, didn't that front-end kit come with a gas block and gas tube?  I also recall seeing a Knight's Brake.  Don't like the looks of it?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: PHX COBRA on February 23, 2006, 02:48:43 PM
Quote from: "azsarge"
Quote from: "Airsofter1"
You could do what I did and cut down the gas block so that it sits inside the rail.

You don't have a gas block, Mikey.  You cut your front sight post.

Ben, didn't that front-end kit come with a gas block and gas tube?  I also recall seeing a Knight's Brake.  Don't like the looks of it?


It did come with a front sight post and and gas tube, i just dont have them on  ATM.  The Knights brake wouldn't allow an inner barrel to stretch through it, so thats why I needed the different brake. (an M4 length inner barrel is just a tad longer then the outer barrel)
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: gixser13 on February 23, 2006, 09:16:21 PM
no those arent mine
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: ValhallenAngel on February 23, 2006, 11:57:13 PM
I was gonna say....
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Dust2Dust on February 24, 2006, 12:11:06 AM
I see classics!!!
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Firehead on February 24, 2006, 12:13:37 AM
Well...I don't think all of those are airsoft guns, I bet most of those are real steel.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: gdaqb on February 24, 2006, 11:24:58 AM
Those belong to a guy named Donny on Arnie's Airsoft, he's in England so I doubt any of those real.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: stoneaglewolf on February 24, 2006, 12:53:10 PM
You know there is probably an entire team out in the field somewhere wondering where their weapons are...

Quote from: "gixser13"
(http://i8.photobucket.com/albums/a16/ladedaa/some_01.jpg)
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: warlock on February 24, 2006, 12:54:18 PM
Quote from: "stoneaglewolf"
You know there is probably an entire country out in the field somewhere wondering where their weapons are...



Fixed that for you :)
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: m-79_Grenadier on February 24, 2006, 10:47:21 PM
Ive always kind of liked short AKs. Except for the funny looking flash hiders.

I while ago, I was going to buy a spetsnaz from someone and turn it into a Bizon. The Bizon would probably have to be my favorite AK varient, but unfortunatley the guy sold it out from under me.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Vince on February 24, 2006, 10:48:12 PM
I have a full metal Spetz you can buy.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: seph6885 on February 25, 2006, 12:49:07 AM
Quote from: "Vince"
I have a full metal Spetz you can buy.


i thought you sold that thing. i might be interested actually.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Caderade on February 25, 2006, 08:36:20 PM
Quote from: "m-79_Grenadier"
Ive always kind of liked short AKs. Except for the funny looking flash hiders.

I while ago, I was going to buy a spetsnaz from someone and turn it into a Bizon. The Bizon would probably have to be my favorite AK varient, but unfortunatley the guy sold it out from under me.


If your interested, here is a picture of a Spetz already converted to a Bizon. http://www.airsoftcommunity.co.uk/galle ... CF2070.JPG (http://www.airsoftcommunity.co.uk/gallery/albums/userpics/10263/normal_DSCF2070.JPG)
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: m-79_Grenadier on February 25, 2006, 10:39:21 PM
Quote from: "Caderade"
Quote from: "m-79_Grenadier"
Ive always kind of liked short AKs. Except for the funny looking flash hiders.

I while ago, I was going to buy a spetsnaz from someone and turn it into a Bizon. The Bizon would probably have to be my favorite AK varient, but unfortunatley the guy sold it out from under me.

If your interested, here is a picture of a Spetz already converted to a Bizon. http://www.airsoftcommunity.co.uk/galle ... CF2070.JPG (http://www.airsoftcommunity.co.uk/gallery/albums/userpics/10263/normal_DSCF2070.JPG)


Really.

If you had actually seen and experienced the complexity and ingenuity of
its groundbreaking magazine design first hand, your oppinion may suggest otherwise.

Personally, I may believe that certain weapons are not to my likings, but I try not to ridicule other peoples' choices among them. For example; I personally dont wish to own any sort of m16 varient weapon airsoft or otherwise, and even that dosent stop me from encouraging other people toward them when they ask what weapon they would like/perfer/have/or otherwise.

Each to his own I guess.

Try to keep an open mind about things. And dont always believe what it seems like on a video game.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Caderade on February 26, 2006, 11:32:09 AM
Quote from: "m-79_Grenadier"
Quote from: "Caderade"
Quote from: "m-79_Grenadier"
Ive always kind of liked short AKs. Except for the funny looking flash hiders.

I while ago, I was going to buy a spetsnaz from someone and turn it into a Bizon. The Bizon would probably have to be my favorite AK varient, but unfortunatley the guy sold it out from under me.

If your interested, here is a picture of a Spetz already converted to a Bizon. http://www.airsoftcommunity.co.uk/galle ... CF2070.JPG (http://www.airsoftcommunity.co.uk/gallery/albums/userpics/10263/normal_DSCF2070.JPG)

Really.

If you had actually seen and experienced the complexity and ingenuity of
its groundbreaking magazine design first hand, your oppinion may suggest otherwise.

Personally, I may believe that certain weapons are not to my likings, but I try not to ridicule other peoples' choices among them. For example; I personally dont wish to own any sort of m16 varient weapon airsoft or otherwise, and even that dosent stop me from encouraging other people toward them when they ask what weapon they would like/perfer/have/or otherwise.

Each to his own I guess.

Try to keep an open mind about things. And dont always believe what it seems like on a video game.


I honestly don't care.
I posted this pic only as a refrence to an already converted AIRSOFT Bizon if you were interested.
Obviously not.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: m-79_Grenadier on February 26, 2006, 12:28:07 PM
Oh! Im sorry.

I do appologize.

It may have been a glitch or somthing. Alot of strange things were happening to the forums last night. For example, whenever I was trying to edit a post, it would for some reason create a whole new post along with the one I had edited. And for some other strarange reason, Im wasnt able to delete my posts anymore. When I first read your post and clicked on the link and for some unknown reason, it linked it to a pic of a bunch of gay cowboys, I may have taken it the wrong way.

Nice pic though now!

Once again, Im sorry for the outburst.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Wolfan8or on February 26, 2006, 12:34:35 PM
Quote from: "Dust2Dust"
My only working classic gun at the moment (SP being shipped to SniperX, and MGC being upgraded by Mousehole Airsoft).
http://media.putfile.com/Kokusai-VS-grapefruit (http://media.putfile.com/Kokusai-VS-grapefruit)

(http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b369/Dust2DustMMA/Guns%20N%20shit/Kokusai/DSC01349.jpg)
(http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b369/Dust2DustMMA/Guns%20N%20shit/Kokusai/DSC01353.jpg)


is it just me or does the magazine look kinda strange, besides the fact that its silver.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Caderade on February 26, 2006, 02:51:14 PM
Quote from: "m-79_Grenadier"
Oh! Im sorry.

I do appologize.

It may have been a glitch or somthing. Alot of strange things were happening to the forums last night. For example, whenever I was trying to edit a post, it would for some reason create a whole new post along with the one I had edited. And for some other strarange reason, Im wasnt able to delete my posts anymore. When I first read your post and clicked on the link and for some unknown reason, it linked it to a pic of a bunch of gay cowboys, I may have taken it the wrong way.

Nice pic though now!

Once again, Im sorry for the outburst.


Snap lol!
Well, this turned out pretty crazy :lol: . No problem man. I'm glad we got this deal cleared up. Thanks for the apology! I am also sorry for that bit of inconsiderate sarcasm.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Ganef on March 05, 2006, 11:35:39 AM
Welcome to the family!
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Firehead on March 05, 2006, 11:39:21 AM
Thanks, Ganef...I feel loved.

I really like this pistol, there are just a few things I need. Gotta get rid of those sights... and I really need to get higher capacity mags.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Raith on March 05, 2006, 11:55:27 AM
ghey springer, dude.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: azsarge on March 08, 2006, 01:22:30 PM
There's a forum for that, Ian.

You damn boys are going to make me buy a Glock when I get to Hood aren't you?!
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Frogman4 on March 08, 2006, 10:15:47 PM
Nice M249, I love those things, say, where so you find those kinds of guns, and do you get them new or used?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Ganef on March 09, 2006, 08:43:26 AM
pretty much any major on line airsoft store has them.

www.wgcshop.com (http://www.wgcshop.com)

www.uncompany.com (http://www.uncompany.com)

www.redwolfairsoft.com (http://www.redwolfairsoft.com)

his was new, and yes it was very expensive. But his is not the same as you would buy it from CA because all his guns are custom bro!! :P
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: azsarge on March 09, 2006, 12:28:32 PM
Quote from: "Ganef"
pretty much any major on line airsoft store has them.

www.wgcshop.com (http://www.wgcshop.com)

www.uncompany.com (http://www.uncompany.com)

www.redwolfairsoft.com (http://www.redwolfairsoft.com)

his was new, and yes it was very expensive. But his is not the same as you would buy it from CA because all his guns are custom bro!! :P


(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v648/cagdboy/resevilapo.jpg)

BTW, I got mine from Airsoft CQB.  It was already upgraded before my hands even touched it.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: SilentDragon on March 09, 2006, 06:42:23 PM
I just had to bring these up.  They caught my attention  8)...

(http://images5.pictiger.com/thumbs/25/f89f90474ff3ce00f7536081f2d51025.th.jpg) (http://server5.pictiger.com/img/175164/sport-and-games/stoner-1.php)

(http://images5.pictiger.com/thumbs/70/10e1083f43b08c9f807b7cabc4cdf470.th.jpg) (http://server5.pictiger.com/img/175165/sport-and-games/maj-pain.php)

Upload Photos With PicTiger (http://www.pictiger.com)

I'm not too sure, but i think it says "Stoner Rifle" on the top one (Azsarge's), and it looks like there's a pot leaf behind the skull on Meanguy's "Maj. Pain."  If I had the money, i would buy one of those guns  8).
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: azsarge on March 09, 2006, 06:57:00 PM
Quote from: "SilentDragon"
I just had to bring these up.  They caught my attention  8)...

(http://images5.pictiger.com/thumbs/25/f89f90474ff3ce00f7536081f2d51025.th.jpg) (http://server5.pictiger.com/img/175164/sport-and-games/stoner-1.php)

(http://images5.pictiger.com/thumbs/70/10e1083f43b08c9f807b7cabc4cdf470.th.jpg) (http://server5.pictiger.com/img/175165/sport-and-games/maj-pain.php)

Upload Photos With PicTiger (http://www.pictiger.com)

I'm not too sure, but i think it says "Stoner Rifle" on the top one (Azsarge's), and it looks like there's a pot leaf behind the skull on Meanguy's "Maj. Pain."  If I had the money, i would buy one of those guns  8).


Stoner, as in Eugene Stoner.  He's the designer of the Ar variant.  I don't smoke, jackass!
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: SilentDragon on March 09, 2006, 07:14:25 PM
I know i'm a jackass, especially since i didn't know who Stoner was... i'm not a history guru.  And didn't mean to say it like that.  I was sure you DIDN'T smoke, that's why it caught my attention.  I was like, "wait a tick..."

I'm such a dumbass... LOL... my bad....

(http://blog.peakdems.org/uploaded_images/Duh%20Bush-784283.jpg)
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Dust2Dust on March 09, 2006, 10:33:55 PM
That is badass & beautiful.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Ganef on March 10, 2006, 09:50:57 AM
It sure as heck aint pink, it is a 2:1 mixture of woodland tan and woodland brown duracoat from www.rmpgunworks.com (http://www.rmpgunworks.com)
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Vince on March 10, 2006, 10:29:52 AM
Maybe you should adjust your monitor's hue and luminance settings. On a correctly calibrated CRT/LCD, it should show up as PMS 135 on the Pantone scale, which is a tan.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Ivan on March 10, 2006, 10:38:16 AM
Was That the same rifle you had at the paintball field a few weeks ago? if so it'd look good if you did a simple 3 color scheme like the bdu's. Not that multicam is bad it's just not used at national ops yet (that I am aware of).
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Ganef on March 10, 2006, 11:34:27 AM
It is the same gun and the only changes that were made to it was the addition of a folding front sight, rail covers, a folding rear sight and the optic. The only thing that is painted differently is the optic and the front sight. I do believe shadow was going to be sporting multicam untill they did away with it for LCV, not that multicam should be any part of the conversation because the gun is not painted multicam, I am the only one with my airsoft guns painted even close. I did a MC paint job on nates real gun and it looks mighty fine, but MC is not for everyone.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Ivan on March 10, 2006, 11:39:10 AM
yah, I brought up multicam, cause it seems to be the hot ticket lately - it looks good, and I know it shoots good lol - i got shot with it - but like i said it'd look real good 3 color instead of just that color.. it's sorta strange looking right now.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: funkylover1010 on March 15, 2006, 10:50:42 PM
Quote from: "SINJIN"
Here is my CA33e

(http://www.ctcmedia.com/airsoft/scope2.jpg)

(http://www.ctcmedia.com/airsoft/scope1.jpg)




ill buy the bricks for 200$$
jk
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Ivan on March 16, 2006, 08:22:29 AM
Im calm, I just don't like people putting me on front street about things that happened on other boards is all.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Vince on April 09, 2006, 11:11:37 PM
woot woot woot
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: HavHav on April 09, 2006, 11:20:33 PM
Looks pretty good.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Raith on April 09, 2006, 11:25:03 PM
Um...?

I see a magazine and a piece of tube?  :lol:
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Airsofter1 on April 09, 2006, 11:47:16 PM
Quote from: "Raith"
Um...?

I see a magazine and a piece of tube?  :lol:


Its camo'd to spec.  Thats Megaforce issue carpet.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: AddoAduro on April 09, 2006, 11:57:10 PM
Looks nice... Does that sight have any magnification?  And it does match the carpet quite well... Did you paint it on the carpet? ;)
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: studdermonkey on April 10, 2006, 06:27:03 AM
Shit, man. Nice gat!
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Gantaliano Hoff on April 10, 2006, 10:13:01 AM
Dang. Nice gear too, there's a "sexy gear" thread that hasn't been bumped in a while. Post some pics of your gear.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: azsarge on April 10, 2006, 01:13:03 PM
You ruined that gun, Matt.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: HavHav on April 10, 2006, 03:39:04 PM
If it was really that bad, why bother telling me?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Vince on April 10, 2006, 04:21:38 PM
Because it had to be said.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: HavHav on April 10, 2006, 04:26:24 PM
How is this any worse than the other painted rifles on this board?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: studdermonkey on April 10, 2006, 04:59:36 PM
Quote from: "azsarge"
You ruined that gun, Matt.


Plus a fuckin' billion.

Just paint over it with some tan there. ;)
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Raith on April 10, 2006, 05:45:05 PM
It looks fine, Hav.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Farslayer on April 10, 2006, 05:54:39 PM
I'd take the time and give it a really good base coat.  Either OD or Khaki.  It will get rid of that spotty look.  After that, you can spray it any other color you want....just my opinion.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: -MAD- SARGE on April 10, 2006, 07:50:22 PM
Dont forget the buffer tube : )   A nice puke color, somehow I feel that the picture doesn't do it justice. Its your gun Hav, paint it how you like it.  Some time I will paint my new gun...........
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: azsarge on April 10, 2006, 08:42:39 PM
It had fucking battle wear from tuning Tan Charlie pussies at LC3, LC4, and numerous AA games.  It was the gun Anthony held when he helped capture Col. McKnight at LC3, and was the gun I used at my first game back from Active Duty.

It's your heater, you do what you want.  It had character, that's all.

Cheers.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Farslayer on April 10, 2006, 08:48:24 PM
Quote from: "azsarge"
It had fucking battle wear from tuning Tan Charlie pussies at LC3, LC4, and numerous AA games.  It was the gun Anthony held when he helped capture Col. McKnight at LC3, and was the gun I used at my first game back from Active Duty.

It's your heater, you do what you want.  It had character, that's all.

Cheers.


Christian's bitterness is just his way of dealing with pain.  He's been through a lot with that gun and it's like losing a brother...
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: azsarge on April 10, 2006, 09:00:37 PM
Quote from: "Farslayer"
Quote from: "azsarge"
It had fucking battle wear from tuning Tan Charlie pussies at LC3, LC4, and numerous AA games.  It was the gun Anthony held when he helped capture Col. McKnight at LC3, and was the gun I used at my first game back from Active Duty.

It's your heater, you do what you want.  It had character, that's all.

Cheers.

Christian's bitterness is just his way of dealing with pain.  He's been through a lot with that gun and it's like losing a brother...

(http://www.getoffthex.com/images/custom/graemlins/flipa.gif)  (http://www.getoffthex.com/images/custom/graemlins/ROFL.gif)

Only you could get away with saying something like that, brother!
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Irish-Sniper on April 14, 2006, 10:49:29 AM
i was thinking of getting a Tm M14. Just wanted to know if its worth the price, or if i should buy something eles.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Farslayer on April 16, 2006, 07:53:56 AM
Dust,

How about a pic of all of your classics?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Firehead on April 16, 2006, 09:09:31 PM
I'd keep the light, it looks really cool with a short barrel. Only ditch it if its really heavy. Supressor has gotta go though.

I'm curious as to why you went with a RAS 2 versus going with a regular RAS. All that RAS2 did was get in your way from having a long solid rail(you could have put a rail sleeve on there, which woulda been way cooler, I think), and limit where you can put optics(you could also argue that it gives you a specific spot for optics, but in my opinion it won't be the best for the invidual shooter).
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: MicrowvbleTurtle on April 16, 2006, 09:26:15 PM
No doubt, the light looks cool.  But I'd rather remove it because it's dead weight during most day skirmishes.  

It's bright as fuck though.  I flashed it in my friend's eyes last night... he couldn't see shit for like five seconds.


As for the RAS II.  I suppose it's just personal opinion.  I think it looks awesome... far better than any rail sleeve.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Vince on April 16, 2006, 09:32:26 PM
Rail sleeves are extra gay, they change the mount height of optics, and they just suck.

Also, I dunno about that little RAS fix unit. There's no wobble to begin with, and it restricts the amount of options you have with which to use your devices. I'm not down with restriction of options with no visible benefit.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: MicrowvbleTurtle on April 16, 2006, 09:44:24 PM
That's the reason I was looking at the EOTech that uses the N batteries instead of the AA.  

I get both of your points.  It certainly does restrict the amount of RAS I have to mount an optic but nevertheless, I like the look of it.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: gixser13 on April 16, 2006, 09:49:36 PM
Quote from: "MicrowvbleTurtle"
, I like the look of it.




 ;) That's all that matters
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Gantaliano Hoff on April 17, 2006, 08:08:54 AM
Nice kit man. [smilie=armata_pdt_34.gif]

Is this gonna be your primary weapon? I remember you said it would be a backup, but a G&P seems kinda pricey for a backup weapon.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Vince on April 17, 2006, 07:55:22 PM
Ha, like half of those guns have something to do with me.


Good stuff, Paul, see you tomorrow.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: SilentDragon on April 17, 2006, 10:28:15 PM
That Sniper G36 is sick!  ANd i remember your P90.... 8)
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Farslayer on April 18, 2006, 07:41:03 AM
Paul,
You have a great selection.  I also like that G36....do you have an up close of that one?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Dust2Dust on April 23, 2006, 12:31:15 PM
Nice gun vince, I like the stock on it now.  It gives it a much better apperance.

Irishsniper, I don't think you've had a gun quite like his before.  And post in the discussion thread.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Raith on April 25, 2006, 01:46:45 PM
Looks good, Ian.  I like the armory number and 20 rd magazine.

(2000th post! Woot!)
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Firehead on April 25, 2006, 01:52:59 PM
I was thinking about changing the "armory number". Not sure what I'll put though. The 20 round magazine...just...looks appropriate with the style of weapon.

Raith, are you planning on painting the CQB? Or are you going to leave it as is?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Raith on April 25, 2006, 01:56:31 PM
Quote from: "Firehead"
Raith, are you planning on painting the CQB? Or are you going to leave it as is?


Yes, I'll paint it.  It won't look like it does now, though.  I have lots of external changes planned.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Gantaliano Hoff on April 25, 2006, 02:32:27 PM
I'm going to paint mine too. I'm starting it today. I plan to take 3-4 days on it, so I should have pics up before the AA game. I don't really have any external plans for it other than a nice flashlight since I have found a group that does a lot of night games.

I like that suppressor Raith. Are you going to stick with the crane stock, or do the ready mag or battery box route?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Firehead on April 25, 2006, 02:36:18 PM
Quote from: "Gantaliano Hoff"
I like that suppressor Raith.


Its not a supressor. Its a KX3 Noveske flash hider.

Kurn, that is a really cool sling mount.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Kurn on April 27, 2006, 02:40:51 AM
Thanks.  So far I'm very pleased with it.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Raith on April 28, 2006, 02:17:14 PM
Whew... Hoff, yeah, paint the whole thing.

It'll look alright if the whole thing is painted, but right now it looks like you decided to throw up on selected parts of the gun. :P
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: sdobbins on April 28, 2006, 03:38:41 PM
I am a fan of using 2 tone on things Gantaliano Hoff, but for that camo pattern I think the whole thing painted would look better.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Kurn on May 01, 2006, 07:36:18 PM
Are you going to paint the rest of your gun Nate?  I like the two tone looks it has.  It's very distinctive, kinda looks like you had to change out the upper at the last moment or something.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: MicrowvbleTurtle on May 01, 2006, 07:38:35 PM
Kurn, that paint job is good to go.  

What colors did you use and what was your technique?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Kurn on May 01, 2006, 07:52:59 PM
Thanks.  It was really simple to do.  I used Krylon brown and khaki (from their camouflage line).  First I painted the entire gun using the khaki.  I then lightly dusted it in random spots with the brown.  The whole process took about 15 minutes.  A lot of the brown has come off already, which has kinda given the whole thing a patchy look.  I’ve seen Krylon paint do this before, I think it’s because the paint dries before it get to the gun, since it dries so quickly.

On a side note the Krylon camouflage paint is at Wal-Mart for $4 a can, which is $2 cheaper then what Ace sells it for.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Farslayer on May 01, 2006, 08:11:28 PM
Good job Jamie...
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Ganef on May 01, 2006, 10:57:50 PM
Nate get some tan rail covers on that thing...

Great job jamie!
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: studdermonkey on May 02, 2006, 12:26:38 AM
Quote from: "Ganef"
Nate get some tan rail covers on that thing...

Great job jamie!


Six covers are on the way.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: studdermonkey on May 04, 2006, 01:02:13 AM
Damn, Ian. I can't see it! Blends in with the wall!

Details. Is that a midlength rail? What company, or did you build it yourself?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Firehead on May 04, 2006, 01:10:39 AM
Base gun was a Classic Army M4. I threw on a midlength RAS by King Arms, and a 14.5 inch barrel, removed the collapsable stock, and threw on a G&P A2 stock. I basically resurrected it from a completely ruined gun. Only thing left on the inside that is CA is my body, gearbox case, and some of the wiring stuff. Everything inside the gearbox, minus the wiring and switches is systema. The spring needs to be replaced, it has been compressed due to battery failure(I just realized it was compressed) since the 29th game.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Gantaliano Hoff on May 04, 2006, 09:28:20 AM
Holy friggin crap John!! You can't hide a nice gun like that! It's not right!

You put some character into it too. I like it. Everyone seems to be getting the CQBR right now, so you have to put a little individual charachter into em. Very nice.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Gantaliano Hoff on May 07, 2006, 11:40:56 AM
You know. I just started noticing. Is everyone getting that new model foregrip now? I got one a long time ago and now they're all popping up. I can't even remember who makes it. Do you guys know?

   ll
   V

(http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y243/j_figueroa2003/100_0293.jpg)
(http://i43.photobucket.com/albums/e355/brando18/DSCN1069.jpg)
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Raith on May 07, 2006, 11:59:14 AM
Quote from: "Gantaliano Hoff"
I can't even remember who makes it. Do you guys know?


Guarder makes it.  There may be other manufacturers as well.

http://www.intrudershop.com/show_produc ... roduct=811 (http://www.intrudershop.com/show_product_eng.asp?idproduct=811)
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: IcePlatinumSky on May 12, 2006, 06:45:39 PM
Hey alex nice G3's.  Those are great guns out on the field. Finaly another G3 lover!!!
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: alex on May 12, 2006, 06:59:43 PM
Yeah the G3's kick ass, and that particular one is my pride and joy. Do you have a G3 IcePlatinum Sky? If so, I'd like to see some pics, dont really ever see too many around....
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: IcePlatinumSky on May 12, 2006, 08:52:59 PM
Yes I have a G3 SG1 with the classic army light metal body. I converted the front end over for a silencer. Thats realy the only difference. But, I dont have pics other than camra phone.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: trigguh5432 on May 23, 2006, 02:42:29 PM
liquid sky, what the hell is that thing on the side of your M4?

http://www.airsoftarizona.com/forumbb/viewtopic.php?t=7946&start=75
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: seph6885 on May 23, 2006, 02:47:19 PM
its an an-peq for a battery.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: trigguh5432 on May 23, 2006, 02:57:12 PM
Quote
its an an-peq for a battery.
ah i see
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: studdermonkey on May 29, 2006, 07:22:48 PM
Liquid Sky, do you have a problem with the edit button, or is this how they do shit in Commiefornia? And don't try to just show off, the guns aren't that great. Posting pictures of the same ones over and over isn't that great either.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Gantaliano Hoff on June 06, 2006, 05:17:11 PM
And Vince said it would look assy. Good job Art. That looks pretty sweet.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Cheeze_IZ_G00d on June 07, 2006, 06:25:55 AM
Very nicely done Art. Also, +1 for actually taking the time to do the painting right, what with the priming and all.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: -MAD- SARGE on June 15, 2006, 09:57:23 PM
Quote from: "Ganef"
one of these M4s is not like the other...


Because one of them is a frickin Bone Saw  8)

Man you have enough guns there to supply your average “rude Mediterranean bad guyâ€￾ squad.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: LiquidSky on June 15, 2006, 10:53:49 PM
Quote from: "studdermonkey"
Liquid Sky, do you have a problem with the edit button, or is this how they do s*** in Commiefornia? And don't try to just show off, the guns aren't that great. Posting pictures of the same ones over and over isn't that great either.


Your forums were slow and i was alt+tab'ing between pages because my multitasking is pretty on it.

next time you should either edit the posts yourself or ask me like a responsible adult instead of being a jerk about it. i'm not a kid. i don't treat others like that even on my forums.

you want to talk? PM, email or call me on the phone. John Figueroa has my number.

P.S.

i just realized why i did that. it was during LC5 and there was a whole lot of non-topic ranting going on without moderation. i was trying to bleed that out and get it off the last page status to hopefull kill it off.

P.P.S.

NONE of those are the same weapon.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Farslayer on June 15, 2006, 11:02:10 PM
Damn Vince....
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: gixser13 on June 15, 2006, 11:31:50 PM
Quote from: "LiquidSky"
Quote from: "studdermonkey"
Liquid Sky, do you have a problem with the edit button, or is this how they do s*** in Commiefornia? And don't try to just show off, the guns aren't that great. Posting pictures of the same ones over and over isn't that great either.

.



I hate when peoples mouths write checks there ass cant cash,
Internet bravery at its best
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: War savage on June 16, 2006, 12:13:32 AM
Quote from: "gixser13"
Quote from: "LiquidSky"
Quote from: "studdermonkey"
Liquid Sky, do you have a problem with the edit button, or is this how they do s*** in Commiefornia? And don't try to just show off, the guns aren't that great. Posting pictures of the same ones over and over isn't that great either.

.


I hate when peoples mouths write checks there ass cant cash,
Internet bravery at its best


I'll second that. You may want to think twice about making a balsy comment to Liquidsky if you don't know him. He doesn't have a problem speaking his mind in your face. I witnessed it at its fullest at a game in Cali and heard a few interesting stories. He definitely is the opposite of communist. We'll just say he's well known in that part of the country.

By the way, he's putting on an awesome game the 17th if anyone is in Socal this weekend. It's gonna be big.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: studdermonkey on June 16, 2006, 12:55:28 AM
Quote from: "gixser13"
Quote from: "LiquidSky"
Quote from: "studdermonkey"
Liquid Sky, do you have a problem with the edit button, or is this how they do s*** in Commiefornia? And don't try to just show off, the guns aren't that great. Posting pictures of the same ones over and over isn't that great either.

.


I hate when peoples mouths write checks there ass cant cash,
Internet bravery at its best


I didn't know who he was, I'm hearing now he's a cool guy. I don't take back what I said, but I appologise for saying it in the manner it was said.

And what check did I write, Dave? Did I say I was going to do anything about it? No. It wasn't internet bravery, it was merely talk, and it wouldn't happen in real life, because the situation wouldn't have happen in real life.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: -MAD- SARGE on June 16, 2006, 01:27:42 AM
This isnt real life?  Ah Crap, then there is no spoon. Skyler was right!

Back on topic, Vince now you cant paint that gun due to the trade factor.  Still, it looks very nice.
Was that your CA CQB that you put an HK body on?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Vince on June 16, 2006, 01:29:45 AM
It's a full HK416 conversion kit.

I'm going to refinish the whole rifle and then re-paint the trades.

Ironically, I have every piece necessary in my house, right now, to copy Jeremy Miller's HK416 as well :D

Skylar's always right. McGee's Marauders! OUT.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Malice on June 16, 2006, 03:14:51 AM
Quote
Ironically, I have every piece necessary in my house, right now, to copy Jeremy Miller's HK416 as well  


:D

Better hurry, Vince.  I've got a set of Troy BUIS, and a Larue LT 1.93 on order...and I'm leaning on G&P to send me one of their IR PEQ-2 replicas.  It'll go nicely with my ANVIS-6's when my guy finishes getting them built.  :D

Nice looking 416 though...gotta shed that Krink though...it does nothing on a gas piston system on a real rifle.  ;)

-Jeremy
(Gearwhoring in the NW since 1998)
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Vince on June 16, 2006, 01:05:46 PM
That's what I thought, but POF uppers ship with Krink brakes and I've seen some AR15 pictures of people with LW uppers with Krink brakes, and the LW rifle I handled at SHOT had a Krink brake on it, so, who knows.

The KX3 is good because on real rifles, it directs all flash and noise forward of the shooter. I dunno, until I read otherwise, I'm gonna keep it on there (and it's like, the best airsoft suppressor).

I don't think I'll EVER have any NODs...but I could borrow an IWAL-2 and put it inside my current PEQ and, well, I can order replica Troy BUIS :D

Nah, I like my rifle now it is now.

http://66.102.7.104/search?q=cache:_yet ... clnk&cd=10 (http://66.102.7.104/search?q=cache:_yetCTQZacMJ:www.weaponforums.com/lite/topic.html%3Fb%3D3%26f%3D12%26t%3D240358%26page%3D3+Krink+brake+on+gas+piston&hl=en&gl=us&ct=clnk&cd=10)
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: babybackribs on June 18, 2006, 12:33:57 PM
Hey Vince, how's that PGC gearbox working out?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: AddoAduro on July 07, 2006, 12:37:29 AM
I would've been more than happy to trade that piece of crap for the 552. ;)

Wait, I meant, that's a nice gun, is it a SOPMOD M14? (I'm tired, can't think straight...)
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: azmjs on July 07, 2006, 09:12:58 AM
Yeah, m14 sopmod, got it from gixer13.

I was like, one iota from trading it for the sig, but at the last minute decided to keep it.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: AddoAduro on July 08, 2006, 04:20:21 AM
Is that....  No, it can't be...  Is that a Maruzen MP5-K?  If it is, I'd be your servant for life if you'd give me some or all of those mags. :D

And azmjs, do I detect a hint of sarcasm? ;)
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Kurn on July 08, 2006, 04:29:31 AM
Looks like an AEG to me.  Don't the Maruzens have a hollow pistol grip?

pilz, how did you mount that m4 stock?  It looks like a neat setup.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: pilz on July 08, 2006, 12:30:36 PM
Quote from: "Kurn"
Looks like an AEG to me.  Don't the Maruzens have a hollow pistol grip?

pilz, how did you mount that m4 stock?  It looks like a neat setup.


Its a Tm Mp5k. The m4 stock was put on by a friend but i know how to take it off and how it works, First you have to take the buttplate off and take out the sling mount there should be a little washer thing that holds the sling mount in, its hard to get off but it comes off. The you take a M4 stock with the stock screw and you stick the stock screw into the buttplate
then you put a nut on the end of it and tighten it. then thats how you get a m4 stock on a mp5k.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: GrimUSMC on July 08, 2006, 08:09:52 PM
Nice AK but did you have to use an In 'n' Out burger for reference? Just looking at that juicy burger is making me hungry for a 4x4 with no cheese (yes i know it doesnt make it a 4x4 without the cheese )
*originally posted in wrong section my bad*
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: PolandsLeftTesticle on July 08, 2006, 08:11:18 PM
N/p. Thanks for the comment--appreciate it much. I hope to get it upgraded once I finally get a real job, but it's nice just the way it is.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: pilz on July 12, 2006, 09:00:25 AM
whats with liquidskies pic of his m4 with the bipod, tha background is blury and the gun isn't/ Did he photoshop it?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Farslayer on July 12, 2006, 09:57:38 AM
Quote from: "pilz"
whats with liquidskies pic of his m4 with the bipod, tha background is blury and the gun isn't/ Did he photoshop it?


Probably auto focus on his digital camera.  Macro setting will focus clearly on the foreground and blurr out the area farther away.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: pilz on July 18, 2006, 08:31:33 PM
nice type 89.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: seph6885 on July 18, 2006, 08:36:36 PM
thanks. it really is a very nice gun. only problem is the stick battery. i'll have to get around that somehow.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: pilz on July 18, 2006, 08:53:45 PM
hows the burst working out? and is it metal?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: seph6885 on July 19, 2006, 12:17:27 AM
yes, it has a metal body. anything that is metal on the real steel is metal on this. the burst is great.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Dust2Dust on July 19, 2006, 12:39:20 AM
So... you going to be at the game saturday?  I want to see this thing... then see if an Escort version would be possible ;)
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: seph6885 on July 19, 2006, 01:10:05 AM
cant make it on the 22nd, but i'll bring it out on the 29th. might not be 'combat ready' by then though. im low on funds.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: babybackribs on July 19, 2006, 01:39:35 PM
Where does the battery go?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Vince on July 19, 2006, 01:40:44 PM
It's a stick, so I assume a dust cover of some sort is removed from the received.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: babybackribs on July 19, 2006, 01:47:54 PM
And aren't metal recievers illegal in Japan?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: pilz on July 22, 2006, 08:07:41 PM
i don't think they are, or they wouldn't have made it metal.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: JoJockAmo on July 22, 2006, 10:28:53 PM
Quote from: "babybackribs"
Where does the battery go?


(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v285/jojockamo/89-12.jpg)
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v285/jojockamo/89-08.jpg)
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: babybackribs on July 24, 2006, 03:19:17 PM
Seph, are you gonna rewire it to the stock?  Or just keep it the way it is?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: seph6885 on July 24, 2006, 03:34:46 PM
keeping it the way it is for now. it works fine so why mess with it?

Quote from: "bsadk4life"
my dick is a type 89, sugar.....


and i've said it before, and i'll say it again. bsadk4life needs to go.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: babybackribs on July 24, 2006, 04:27:27 PM
Does battery voltage affect the burst of the gearbox like it did with the SIG 550?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Firehead on July 24, 2006, 05:14:32 PM
Quote from: "babybackribs"
Does battery voltage affect the burst of the gearbox like it did with the SIG 550?


From everything I have read, that hasn't been tested. I'd think not becuase of the fact that its supposedly a mechanical burst.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: babybackribs on July 25, 2006, 06:18:10 PM
That's what I thought.  And BOOM, you forgot gasoline.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: pilz on July 25, 2006, 07:27:54 PM
Quote from: "babybackribs"
That's what I thought.  And BOOM, you forgot gasoline.


yea, thats what he used to get off the paint.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: B00MINATOR on July 25, 2006, 07:43:25 PM
Lol.
Oh yeah.
Thanks guys.

-B00M!
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: pilz on July 28, 2006, 11:57:18 PM
nice m4 Brando, that looks like a kick ass support gun.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: pilz on July 30, 2006, 09:19:55 PM
that shrike is SOLID!!!, i like it better than a 249, once you get that motor it should be great, and that thing hurts..., but its a very good gun.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: babybackribs on July 31, 2006, 10:25:57 PM
You should lose the Delta Force silencer.  It's not made for big guns.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Brando on August 01, 2006, 02:16:14 PM
its hiding a tightbore currently
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Farslayer on August 03, 2006, 09:32:22 PM
Brando, that is a sweet gun.  Very nice.

Pryde, you have a great selection.  I didn't know you had so many.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Pryde on August 03, 2006, 09:40:56 PM
Quote from: "Farslayer"
Pryde, you have a great selection.  I didn't know you had so many.



Yeah, MP5s have become a bit of a hobby of mine since CYMA released theirs for $100
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: pilz on August 03, 2006, 10:24:08 PM
kinda off topic...

pyrde know you already have a sd5, but do you want mine for $210 its a CA.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Pryde on August 03, 2006, 11:48:02 PM
I'd be interested, but I doubt I'd have the funds until after the holiday season passes....thanks for the offer though


.....now back to your regularily scheduled program.....
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: B00MINATOR on August 05, 2006, 11:34:56 PM
Ribs, bravo on your CQB.

I really like it!!

-B00M!
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: pilz on August 06, 2006, 12:19:28 AM
somting wierd, my CQB with the battery and flash hider weighs than than that gun with the ACOG M203 and battery. i think my gun is a little hevy.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Cheeze_IZ_G00d on August 06, 2006, 07:15:34 AM
Looks very similar to my CQB. One day I will post pics.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: babybackribs on August 06, 2006, 09:54:13 AM
Thanks.  I like it.  The funny thing is is that the only thing that is left that is from the original gun is the gearbox internals, besides the spring and cylinder.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Speedy on August 06, 2006, 10:02:39 AM
R u gonna leave it stock????
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Speedy on August 06, 2006, 10:02:55 AM
R u gonna leave it stock????
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: babybackribs on August 06, 2006, 11:10:34 AM
I already have an AK tightbore, KM cylinder, and Guarder SP110 spring.  Plus, it's a G&P based gun, so everything else should be fine.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Cheeze_IZ_G00d on August 06, 2006, 11:36:37 AM
Yea, I have the G&P version myself. Although, I kept the Marine receiver on mine.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: AddoAduro on August 07, 2006, 10:27:35 PM
So, babybackribs... Where do you live again? And what time will you be gone with the gun in the house? ;)

(It looks awesome)
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: PolandsLeftTesticle on August 09, 2006, 01:34:21 PM
Quote from: "Fish"
OKay here is my new spraying partner.

Just kidding, actually its just something I've wanted for looks. I don't like winding mags, and I don't like standards. I now most people do not like drum mags but to each his own.

(http://img528.imageshack.us/img528/1141/picture237if4.th.jpg) (http://img528.imageshack.us/my.php?image=picture237if4.jpg)

(http://img204.imageshack.us/img204/8161/picture240ty6.th.jpg) (http://img204.imageshack.us/my.php?image=picture240ty6.jpg)

(http://img90.imageshack.us/img90/6973/picture241sn7.th.jpg) (http://img90.imageshack.us/my.php?image=picture241sn7.jpg)

(http://img220.imageshack.us/img220/8425/picture242gg5.th.jpg) (http://img220.imageshack.us/my.php?image=picture242gg5.jpg)


Ugh. Man, I know you don't like to aim your gun and stuff, and even though I liked the idea of a super-hi-capacity, auto-winding mag, it looks kinda ugly.

You should give it to me instead.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Fish on August 09, 2006, 01:36:55 PM
Meh I still have my other mags, and it looks allitle different up close.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: PolandsLeftTesticle on August 09, 2006, 01:38:32 PM
I think it'd look fine if it was longer, scopeless, and the rest f your gun wasn't so shiny. Or maybe it's just the lighting.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Vince on August 09, 2006, 01:38:53 PM
Quote from: "Fish"
Meh I still have my other mags, and it looks allitle different up close.


Unless it radically changes how unrealistic and silly the whole endeavor is by moving the point of view a foot forward, my opinion is still the same.

You took a nice gun and made it look retarded.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: PHX COBRA on August 09, 2006, 02:32:56 PM
Quote from: "Vince"
Quote from: "Fish"
Meh I still have my other mags, and it looks allitle different up close.

Unless it radically changes how unrealistic and silly the whole endeavor is by moving the point of view a foot forward, my opinion is still the same.

You took a nice gun and made it look retarded.


I agree, gun looks like a fuckin pile of gay now.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: War savage on August 09, 2006, 03:08:37 PM
Quote from: "Fish"
OKay here is my new spraying partner.

Just kidding, actually its just something I've wanted for looks. I don't like winding mags, and I don't like standards. I now most people do not like drum mags but to each his own.

(http://img528.imageshack.us/img528/1141/picture237if4.th.jpg) (http://img528.imageshack.us/my.php?image=picture237if4.jpg)

(http://img204.imageshack.us/img204/8161/picture240ty6.th.jpg) (http://img204.imageshack.us/my.php?image=picture240ty6.jpg)

(http://img90.imageshack.us/img90/6973/picture241sn7.th.jpg) (http://img90.imageshack.us/my.php?image=picture241sn7.jpg)

(http://img220.imageshack.us/img220/8425/picture242gg5.th.jpg) (http://img220.imageshack.us/my.php?image=picture242gg5.jpg)


Hey buddy looks GAY!! (and don't be proud of spray and pray)
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Fish on August 09, 2006, 03:25:14 PM
That was a joke, I did it one game fo like 10 minutes and everyone is on my ass about it...
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: chainsaw on August 09, 2006, 03:34:05 PM
Quote from: "War savage"
Quote from: "Fish"
OKay here is my new spraying partner.

Just kidding, actually its just something I've wanted for looks. I don't like winding mags, and I don't like standards. I now most people do not like drum mags but to each his own.

(http://img528.imageshack.us/img528/1141/picture237if4.th.jpg) (http://img528.imageshack.us/my.php?image=picture237if4.jpg)

(http://img204.imageshack.us/img204/8161/picture240ty6.th.jpg) (http://img204.imageshack.us/my.php?image=picture240ty6.jpg)

(http://img90.imageshack.us/img90/6973/picture241sn7.th.jpg) (http://img90.imageshack.us/my.php?image=picture241sn7.jpg)

(http://img220.imageshack.us/img220/8425/picture242gg5.th.jpg) (http://img220.imageshack.us/my.php?image=picture242gg5.jpg)

Hey buddy looks GAY!! (and don't be proud of spray and pray)


 :lol:
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: War savage on August 09, 2006, 03:36:26 PM
Ok....so it was a joke. Your gun still looks gay. C'mon a drum mag on a AK!? Not to mention the big o'l scope on it. Try looking at real steele photos of AK's and see if you can make it look like the real deal. Then maybe people wouldn't give you such a hard time.

Look at some of the pictures of the guns posted by vets. Their guns look just like the real steele versions. They get their ideas from real steele. Although some still look gay.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: chainsaw on August 09, 2006, 03:38:59 PM
or you could sell it and buy a CQB
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: PolandsLeftTesticle on August 09, 2006, 04:20:19 PM
Now he doesn't deserve this kinda criticism. It looks bad, you guys say it's unrealistic, but it's his gun.

Holy sh*t, I have an AK-74 and I use AK-47 standards in it. Maybe one day I'll also get a drum mag. It's a personal choice and since it's not your AEG, you oughta shut up and keep your own gun the way you want it, not to everyone else's standards.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Vince on August 09, 2006, 04:35:29 PM
Quote from: "PolandsLeftTesticle"
Now he doesn't deserve this kinda criticism. It looks bad, you guys say it's unrealistic, but it's his gun.

Holy sh*t, I have an AK-74 and I use AK-47 standards in it. Maybe one day I'll also get a drum mag. It's a personal choice and since it's not your AEG, you oughta shut up and keep your own gun the way you want it, not to everyone else's standards.


(http://209.85.12.236/4807/1/emo/gtfo.gif)
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Fish on August 09, 2006, 04:41:07 PM
Meh I'm interested in everyones opinion. I'm the type of person that if I wake up one day and decide my gun looks like shit I'll take everything off and go to a game with it naked. I like the way it look, and I like the feel of the drum mag on my gun. Always wanted one. I just ignore chainsaws dump sh!t posts because their worthless to me and waist my time.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: PolandsLeftTesticle on August 09, 2006, 04:43:11 PM
Why do people seem to atack the Marauders? What's wrong with 'em?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: busta_cap on August 09, 2006, 04:53:36 PM
Sometimes I wish AA had a Facial hair requirement or something.
Damn kids.
+1 to Vince's "GTFO"
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: pilz on August 09, 2006, 07:35:30 PM
honestly i don't see anything wrong with his gun unless you're jelous of it. it looks perfectly fine, and since you don't have to play with him i don't see why all of you are so f****** mad. Keep in mind hes 15 and your all adults. [-X
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: chainsaw on August 09, 2006, 09:32:46 PM
Quote from: "Fish"
I just ignore chainsaws dump sh!t posts because their worthless to me and waist my time.


I'm hurt.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: GrimUSMC on August 09, 2006, 09:42:12 PM
Quote from: "busta_cap"
Sometimes I wish AA had a Facial hair requirement or something.
Damn kids.
+1 to Vince's "GTFO"

I totally ROFL at that one.

But fish if your going for the real deal look you might want to drop all that gear off your weapon and use it on something that actually uses it IRL. Otherwise if you like it and can ignore everyones opinons and laughs go for it.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Fish on August 09, 2006, 09:42:43 PM
Your really starting to piss me off.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: studdermonkey on August 09, 2006, 10:56:20 PM
:-( I enjoyed looking at the pictures of the guns. You guys are making fools of yourselves.

Just post pics.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Farslayer on August 09, 2006, 11:23:20 PM
I guess all some care about it slinging plastic down range....nothing wrong with that.  They'll come around, but they'll be a price to pay on the forum so get some tough skin.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: -MAD- SARGE on August 10, 2006, 07:22:05 AM
Quote from: "Farslayer"
I guess all some care about it slinging plastic down range....nothing wrong with that.  They'll come around, but they'll be a price to pay on the forum so get some tough skin.


Nicely put Benn.  Come on guys, you are on a board with people who do milsim.  You can't expect to post a pulse rifle and a smart gun here without getting laughed at. You kids crack me up  :lol:
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: babybackribs on August 10, 2006, 07:39:43 AM
So I guess the "no hicap" and "no drum mag" rule at SWPB never took effect?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: pilz on August 10, 2006, 11:09:50 AM
yep
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: PolandsLeftTesticle on August 10, 2006, 07:46:18 PM
Quote from: "pilz"
heres another look at my guns, the CQB has changed a little, i got rid of those tan rail covers and got magpul ones and a SPR grip.

(http://i39.photobucket.com/albums/e166/Tmpilz/100_1203.jpg)


Sexy. What else are you planning on getting for those guns 'o yours?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: pilz on August 10, 2006, 08:35:51 PM
not sure, probaly just a red dot for the CQB, and a tightbore. Besides that im not sure.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Fish on August 10, 2006, 09:46:14 PM
I like how you kept your CQB all black, its got that tactical look.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Firehead on August 10, 2006, 10:11:47 PM
Quote from: "Fish"
I like how you kept your CGQ all black, its got that tactical look.


What the fuck is a CGQ?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Vince on August 10, 2006, 10:16:04 PM
Carbine, Gentlemen's Quarterly

It's kind of like the Army classification system : helmet, fixed-wing aviation. I think he's saying it's a gun for metrosexuals (which I don't necessarily echo).
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Fish on August 10, 2006, 10:33:37 PM
Sorry, Sorry, I keep mispelling sh!t, I didn't mean to  :cry: .

EDIT: You see, I'm on these pills here...
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: -MAD- SARGE on August 10, 2006, 10:34:57 PM
With all of these new gun creations popping up, Im just going to stop asking the obvious question, Why......
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Vince on August 10, 2006, 10:35:55 PM
It's a REAL GANGSTER grip.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Bow-tie Assasin on August 10, 2006, 10:42:14 PM
Quote from: "Vince"
It's a REAL GANGSTER grip.


HAHA! yeah if you're talking about the one on my M4, I put it there cause the M203 plus if i have it at my waist the grip works great.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: pilz on August 10, 2006, 10:44:17 PM
bowite you have the same grip as i do, and also your m4 is nice, but that ak is kinda ugly it looks to red.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: B00MINATOR on August 11, 2006, 01:33:52 PM
ROFL!!
"A fucking pile of gay."
That made my day.

I think drum mags look good on the "select few." An AKS74UN does not qualify as the "select few."

You're gun just looks proportionally off-balance.
Please loose the optic as well.

-B00M!
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: babybackribs on August 11, 2006, 09:31:13 PM
Bowtie, sorry, but if you need that much firepower for an airsoft gun to make it worth your while playing, then you should just stop right now.  Personally, I think anybody that needs a box or drum mag for airsofting should really re-examine if they should be playing.  Plus, spraying and praying with a box mag WHILE blind firing at the last Ramadi Tales game was just gay.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: PolandsLeftTesticle on August 11, 2006, 09:39:52 PM
There's always the role of support.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: babybackribs on August 11, 2006, 09:47:04 PM
Support should only be done by support weapons.  I.E. M249, M60
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: pilz on August 11, 2006, 10:32:26 PM
Quote from: "babybackribs"
Bowtie, sorry, but if you need that much firepower for an airsoft gun to make it worth your while playing, then you should just stop right now.  Personally, I think anybody that needs a box or drum mag for airsofting should really re-examine if they should be playing.  Plus, spraying and praying with a box mag WHILE blind firing at the last Ramadi Tales game was just gay.


I remeber that, he hit me when he was blind fireing. ](*,)
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: busta_cap on August 11, 2006, 10:34:28 PM
Quote from: babybackribs
Support should only be done by support weapons.  I.E. SAW, M60
SAW means Squad Automatic Weapon, Therefore, a m249, m60 etc etc are all Saw's.. ;)
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: PolandsLeftTesticle on August 11, 2006, 10:59:43 PM
Quote from: "babybackribs"
Support should only be done by support weapons.  I.E. SAW, M60


This doesn't apply to airsoft unless you're a freak for realism. If you can turn a goddamn AK into a sniper rifle, you can sure as hell turn it into a hi-capacity support weapon as well.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: pilz on August 11, 2006, 11:03:26 PM
Quote from: "PolandsLeftTesticle"
Quote from: "babybackribs"
Support should only be done by support weapons.  I.E. SAW, M60

This doesn't apply to airsoft unless you're a freak for realism. If you can turn a goddamn AK into a sniper rifle, you can sure as hell turn it into a hi-capacity support weapon as well.


Just look at Fish for a good example.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Vince on August 11, 2006, 11:11:59 PM
Quote from: "PolandsLeftTesticle"
This doesn't apply to airsoft unless you're a freak for realism.


This is an unfortunate error in your fundamental psychology as pertaining to airsoft.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: busta_cap on August 11, 2006, 11:21:34 PM
I second Vince's comment. Most of us Airsoft for MilSim, the people who don't are generally heckled privately and shot alot at games...
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: babybackribs on August 11, 2006, 11:42:06 PM
Quote from: "PolandsLeftTesticle"

This doesn't apply to airsoft unless you're a freak for realism.  If you can turn a goddamn AK into a sniper rifle, you can sure as hell turn it into a hi-capacity support weapon as well.


If realism doesn't matter to you, then why don't you go and play paintball?  AK sniper rifle=Dragunov, AK support=RPK, M4 sniper rifle=SPR, M4 support=nothing
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: War savage on August 12, 2006, 12:01:17 AM
Quote from: "Vince"
Quote from: "PolandsLeftTesticle"
This doesn't apply to airsoft unless you're a freak for realism.

This is an unfortunate error in your fundamental psychology as pertaining to airsoft.


If you think Airsoft is not a bunch of freaks for realism or Milsim? Your in the wrong hobby/sport my friend!

It's like Farslayer said, they'll eventually come around. And your comment is correct also Busta. Heckled privately and shot at a lot at games....!
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: babybackribs on August 12, 2006, 12:16:48 AM
And pilz, please, for the love of God, vacuum your carpet.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: djmtott on August 12, 2006, 12:26:52 AM
Quote from: "busta_cap"
I second Vince's comment. Most of us Airsoft for MilSim, the people who don't are generally heckled privately and shot alot at games...
Now that's funny!
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Vince on August 12, 2006, 12:29:51 AM
Quote from: "djmtott"
Quote from: "busta_cap"
I second Vince's comment. Most of us Airsoft for MilSim, the people who don't are generally heckled privately and shot alot at games...
Now that's funny!


And true. Bonusballing ain't just for paintball.

That being said, I fire in semi auto only with lots of delay between shots.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: djmtott on August 12, 2006, 12:30:09 AM
Being the noobish outsider here I'd have to say that realism is very important, but it's not absolute.
If you can alter your weapon in a way that looks real/official then it really wouldn't matter if that's the way it look in real life.

Now when you alter your weapon in a way that draws instant negative attention to your modification then you're probably in trouble, and you should repent profusely. ;)
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: B00MINATOR on August 12, 2006, 03:16:53 AM
Quote from: "PolandsLeftTesticle"
Quote from: "babybackribs"
Support should only be done by support weapons.  I.E. SAW, M60

This doesn't apply to airsoft unless you're a freak for realism. If you can turn a goddamn AK into a sniper rifle, you can sure as hell turn it into a hi-capacity support weapon as well.


Bitch please.

Fish now officially owns you.

-B00M!
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: ValhallenAngel on August 12, 2006, 09:48:03 AM
Well technically you can make a real gun look like his ridiculous AK setup.

I mean I'm not saying his gun is retarded, just that it's not practical.... Hey if someone can build an m4 with an assload of rails and accessories why not an AK?

http://members.shaw.ca/planetairsoft/Pi ... /m4saw.jpg (http://members.shaw.ca/planetairsoft/Pictures/gallery/submitedphotos/Quoc/m4saw.jpg)

http://www.mfiap.com/airsoft/acce/sm_MP ... loseup.jpg (http://www.mfiap.com/airsoft/acce/sm_MP5+m4-h-bar+laser_tacm+slide+ris+ka-closeup.jpg)
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: babybackribs on August 12, 2006, 10:12:41 AM
Cuz AK's aren't supposed to have an "assload" of accessories on them.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: mini-support on August 12, 2006, 11:32:43 AM
Even I have to pipe in on this one. I personally think the gun looks retarded but, I dont have to carry it. I thought it looked retarded before the drum with the big silver scope on it. Again, Im not carrying it.
We all have to take into consideration his age and what we all thought was cool at that age/maturity level. I am sure he will come around someday, realize how damn stupid it looks and strip it.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: ValhallenAngel on August 12, 2006, 12:09:02 PM
Well if you watch many action movies, there is always some asshole running around with a gun full of worthless mods... Like a scope on an MP5k
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: babybackribs on August 12, 2006, 01:35:33 PM
And a drum mag on an M4.  Which brings me back to my original point:  People who need drum and box mags for their guns should quit right now, except for people with M249's, M60's, etc...
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: PolandsLeftTesticle on August 12, 2006, 01:52:02 PM
Quote from: "babybackribs"
Cuz AK's aren't supposed to have an "assload" of accessories on them.


http://securityarms.com/20010315/galler ... 0/3162.htm (http://securityarms.com/20010315/galleryfiles/3100/3162.htm)

Aren't supposed to?

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.

-------

The realism is what I like about airsoft, but I'm not a Communist (anymore) about it. Maybe buying a drum mag is more worth your money than a sh*tload of standards or hi's. It's easier to carry, and just because you can carry 3000 rounds doesn't mean you will. I've always played against Fish because we always just ended up on different teams, and at no point in time did he blindfire (to other post) nor did he ever spray excessively (unless the guy was right in front of him). His gun setup is fine. He said he's going to take off the scope at the next game he's attending, so you guys can breathe easier.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: pilz on August 12, 2006, 06:27:16 PM
Quote from: "PolandsLeftTesticle"
Quote from: "babybackribs"
Cuz AK's aren't supposed to have an "assload" of accessories on them.

http://securityarms.com/20010315/galler ... 0/3162.htm (http://securityarms.com/20010315/galleryfiles/3100/3162.htm)

Aren't supposed to?

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.

-------

The realism is what I like about airsoft, but I'm not a Communist (anymore) about it. Maybe buying a drum mag is more worth your money than a sh*tload of standards or hi's. It's easier to carry, and just because you can carry 3000 rounds doesn't mean you will. I've always played against Fish because we always just ended up on different teams, and at no point in time did he blindfire (to other post) nor did he ever spray excessively (unless the guy was right in front of him). His gun setup is fine. He said he's going to take off the scope at the next game he's attending, so you guys can breathe easier.


OMG that ugly ak blinded me!!!
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: PolandsLeftTesticle on August 12, 2006, 09:17:15 PM
Well, duh, it's got a bunch of accessories on it as an example. The point was to show that and AK can and is, in real life, totally accessorized.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: babybackribs on August 12, 2006, 09:28:08 PM
Quote from: "PolandsLeftTesticle"
Quote from: "babybackribs"
Cuz AK's aren't supposed to have an "assload" of accessories on them.

http://securityarms.com/20010315/galler ... 0/3162.htm (http://securityarms.com/20010315/galleryfiles/3100/3162.htm)

Aren't supposed to?

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.

-------

The realism is what I like about airsoft, but I'm not a Communist (anymore) about it. Maybe buying a drum mag is more worth your money than a sh*tload of standards or hi's. It's easier to carry, and just because you can carry 3000 rounds doesn't mean you will. I've always played against Fish because we always just ended up on different teams, and at no point in time did he blindfire (to other post) nor did he ever spray excessively (unless the guy was right in front of him). His gun setup is fine. He said he's going to take off the scope at the next game he's attending, so you guys can breathe easier.


My point exactly.  AK's with a bunch of accessories look weird.  And I think that people with drum mags have an unfair advantage over people who don't.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Bow-tie Assasin on August 12, 2006, 09:30:18 PM
Quote from: "babybackribs"
And a drum mag on an M4.  Which brings me back to my original point:  People who need drum and box mags for their guns should quit right now, except for people with M249's, M60's, etc...


Some people can't afford to dish out $900 for an M249 or $500 for an M60, so to get somewhat of the same MG effect they get a Box/drum mag for a lot cheaper. You should wait till your'e even old enough for AA games before you tell other people to "quit".
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Bow-tie Assasin on August 12, 2006, 09:36:55 PM
Quote from: "pilz"
Quote from: "babybackribs"
Bowtie, sorry, but if you need that much firepower for an airsoft gun to make it worth your while playing, then you should just stop right now.  Personally, I think anybody that needs a box or drum mag for airsofting should really re-examine if they should be playing.  Plus, spraying and praying with a box mag WHILE blind firing at the last Ramadi Tales game was just gay.

I remeber that, he hit me when he was blind fireing. ](*,)


Actually at the time i wasnt blindfiring. It was a see through tarp So i was looking at you guys while shooting. I do admit it was very cheap to do but i didnt want to pop around the corner because matt was right there with his weapon ready. It was a spur of the moment thing so my apologies
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: babybackribs on August 12, 2006, 09:38:36 PM
Why do you even need a box mag?  Hip shooting, spray and pray, and blind firing aren't exactly welcomed in the world of airsoft.  That's why people use sights to hit people.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Bow-tie Assasin on August 12, 2006, 09:44:59 PM
Quote from: "babybackribs"
Why do you even need a box mag?  Hip shooting, spray and pray, and blind firing aren't exactly welcomed in the world of airsoft.  That's why people use sights to hit people.


First off at the ramadi tales game, did you see me hold it at the hip? NO! In fact has enybody EVER seen me hold that weapon at the hip? NO! I have done it at small backyard games just for fun. And i have blindfired a total of one time at an organized event. I need a box mag to make it somewhat of a support weapon. Like i said im not able to dish out almost a grand on one gun.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: babybackribs on August 12, 2006, 09:45:56 PM
But your M4 looks like it cost that much.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: PolandsLeftTesticle on August 12, 2006, 09:51:41 PM
Wow, stop arguing on the internet, Ribs. It's retarded.

I like your gun collection, Bow-Tie. Kick-f*cking-ass. My bud has the same wood kit. Only downer about it, IMO, is that the pistol grip is a bit fat at the top, and that the wood is finished so nicely it starts to slip easier.

Quote from: "Bow-tie Assasin"
(http://img147.imageshack.us/img147/1934/hpim0173io0.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)
TM M4-
Systema high speed gears
Systema Polycarb Piston
Systema Aluminum Piston Head
Systema Cylinder Head
Systema Spring Guide
Systema Tappet Plate
Systema Oiless Bushings
M90 Spring
AK47 Inner Barrel
G&P Ergo Pistol Grip
G&P AK Flashider
SRC RIS System
NC Red-Dot Scope
Sun Projects M203 Grenade Launcher


(http://img155.imageshack.us/img155/7189/hpim0171nj5.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)

(http://img155.imageshack.us/img155/4549/hpim0038hm5.jpg)
 (http://http)
TM AK47-
G&P Wood Kit
G&P Flashider
M110 Spring
6.04 Precision Barrel


(http://img155.imageshack.us/img155/6816/hpim0040aa4.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)
CA MP5-SD5

(http://img155.imageshack.us/img155/9814/hpim0039qa5.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)
Maruzen MP5K-
Gaurder Enhanced Loading Muzzle
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Bow-tie Assasin on August 12, 2006, 09:52:35 PM
Quote from: "babybackribs"
But your M4 looks like it cost that much.


with the M203 and internals, yes. But it took months and months of putting that gun together , spending $240 on the gun then $80 on the mag I was set for another six months before i got the RIS and some of the internals. Plus im just talking gun and mag when i mentioned that not all people could afford an m249, i dont use both the box and m203 at once, that was just for the pic.

My M4 with interrnals, mag, and ris= $550

CA M249 w/o Drum mag= i belive its $850-$900

Big diff. up to $350
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: babybackribs on August 12, 2006, 09:53:27 PM
I'm just saying that I don't think box mags are practical.  A couple of hicaps could do the trick, even as a support weapon.  But hey, to each his own.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: busta_cap on August 13, 2006, 12:00:56 AM
Bow Tie WTF do you have that foregrip on the side of the gun for? Just end your life.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: pilz on August 13, 2006, 12:02:13 AM
Quote from: "busta_cap"
Bow Tie WTF do you have that foregrip on the side of the gun for? Just end your life.


Maybe he thinks its a Sten type gun, or he just likes the feel, again this is his gun...
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: PolandsLeftTesticle on August 13, 2006, 12:04:23 AM
Quote from: "busta_cap"
Bow Tie WTF do you have that foregrip on the side of the gun for? Just end your life.


I'm planning on doing that to a G&G UMP. *pause* B*TCH.
I like that look.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: B00MINATOR on August 13, 2006, 12:04:32 AM
Quote from: "busta_cap"
Bow Tie WTF do you have that foregrip on the side of the gun for? Just end your life.


We already went over this.

It's ganster, dog :lol:

-B00M!
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: busta_cap on August 13, 2006, 12:10:00 AM
might as well have bought a CA M249..And it would have been 100x. better.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: seph6885 on August 13, 2006, 12:34:32 AM
the only circumstance that should allow you to have a foregrip on the siderail is if you made an m56 smart gun.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: babybackribs on August 13, 2006, 01:42:46 AM
Quote from: "Bow-tie Assasin"
Quote from: "Vince"
It's a REAL GANGSTER grip.

HAHA! yeah if you're talking about the one on my M4, I put it there cause the M203 plus if i have it at my waist the grip works great.


It's for hip support.  The gun probably weighs 20 pounds.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: babybackribs on August 13, 2006, 01:43:38 AM
Edit:  Woops, double post.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: busta_cap on August 13, 2006, 02:20:51 AM
No it doesn't weigh 20lbs ....
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: pilz on August 13, 2006, 09:42:34 AM
I would say 10lbs max, because the gun isn't all steel and the box mag is plastic.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: babybackribs on August 13, 2006, 02:24:45 PM
Still, it's like holding an 18 wheeler.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Fish on August 13, 2006, 04:54:02 PM
WOW, all this because I posted a pic of my new drum mag?? WTF? you guys need to calm down! I can do what I want to do. And I didn't get a drum mag because I dont have enough BBs, but because I like them. Just because my gun isn't something a russian soldier would hold, it deosn't mean I'm don't like milsim.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Bow-tie Assasin on August 13, 2006, 06:34:23 PM
Quote from: "busta_cap"
might as well have bought a CA M249..And it would have been 100x. better.


I dont think so. Id put my M4 against any 249 anyday of the week. Im talking just the gun and box mag not the m203.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Bow-tie Assasin on August 13, 2006, 06:34:53 PM
Quote from: "busta_cap"
might as well have bought a CA M249..And it would have been 100x. better.


I dont think so. Id put my M4 against any 249 anyday of the week. Im talking just the gun and box mag not the m203.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Vince on August 13, 2006, 06:36:02 PM
Quote from: "Bow-tie Assasin"
Quote from: "busta_cap"
might as well have bought a CA M249..And it would have been 100x. better.

I dont think so. Id put my M4 against any 249 anyday of the week. Im talking just the gun and box mag not the m203.


I wouldn't. Can you fire your whole box mag in one continuous burst without getting worried? SAWs don't have V2 gearboxes because V2 gearboxes are the weakest, mechanically.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Bow-tie Assasin on August 13, 2006, 06:36:07 PM
Quote from: "busta_cap"
Bow Tie WTF do you have that foregrip on the side of the gun for? Just end your life.


Id rather end yours.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Firehead on August 13, 2006, 06:38:34 PM
Shut the fuck up.

The grip on the side of the gun is gay, but if he likes it that way, fine.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Popapalooza on August 13, 2006, 06:41:43 PM
Woah now everyones getting flamed for "customizing" their gun the way they want; everyone is being so critical :x  I'm glad I didn't post pics of my gun...it's a G36K with an RAS unit and box mag
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Bow-tie Assasin on August 13, 2006, 06:45:11 PM
Quote from: "Vince"
Quote from: "Bow-tie Assasin"
Quote from: "busta_cap"
might as well have bought a CA M249..And it would have been 100x. better.

I dont think so. Id put my M4 against any 249 anyday of the week. Im talking just the gun and box mag not the m203.

I wouldn't. Can you fire your whole box mag in one continuous burst without getting worried? SAWs don't have V2 gearboxes because V2 gearboxes are the weakest, mechanically.


No, but id feel more than comfortably aginst an m249 with my m4. with its internals its got a great rof and slightly higher than stock fps. plus ibelieve an m249 would run out of ammo before i would. To end the argument about the grip, I put it there for the F***ing picture, it was just for kicks and giggles and i never have it there during games, no biggy.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: busta_cap on August 13, 2006, 06:49:36 PM
Atleast we can debate without getting flamed up or cussing up a storm.

Try ending my life in person I would like to see that very much So :)
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Vince on August 13, 2006, 06:51:30 PM
I dunno, 2,500 rounds is a lot of ammunition.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Bow-tie Assasin on August 13, 2006, 06:53:05 PM
Quote from: "Vince"
I dunno, 2,500 rounds is a lot of ammunition.


and 5000 rounds is double that :lol:

you guys can bash my gun all you want, i could care less, im done posting on this topic.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: busta_cap on August 13, 2006, 06:55:12 PM
This has inspired me to buy an M249 So i can unload on people.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Vince on August 13, 2006, 06:56:49 PM
The point is, that anything past 5,000 is kind of superfluous...besides which, what sort of magazine storage do you have? With the SAW and MAG box mags, you can carry multiple magazines and deploy them quickly. I was the Assistant SAW Gunner at LCV for our squad and the SAW was reloadable in about 25 seconds. In the end, the SAW will be realistic and the M4 with the box mag is for gamers.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: HavHav on August 13, 2006, 06:59:13 PM
Quote from: "busta_cap"
Atleast we can debate without getting flamed up or cussing up a storm.

Try ending my life in person I would like to see that very much So :)


I'd pay to see that 'fight'.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: mini-support on August 13, 2006, 07:23:21 PM
Ill put the mini against that... whatever it suposed to be, any day....
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: taz on August 13, 2006, 08:44:25 PM
Quote from: "Bow-tie Assasin"
Quote from: "busta_cap"
might as well have bought a CA M249..And it would have been 100x. better.

I dont think so. Id put my M4 against any 249 anyday of the week. Im talking just the gun and box mag not the m203.


I happen to have a CA249 and I'd take it over your m4/whatever it is. I would put it against your m4.  :P
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: babybackribs on August 14, 2006, 02:29:04 AM
2,500 rounds is plenty of ammo, even for a support gunner.  5,000 is just over kill.  I don't even use that much in 3 games.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: pilz on August 23, 2006, 06:47:10 AM
Im just curious, why does everyone paint their gun... most of turn out ugly and then you f$3*ed. Except like AK's and m14's which turn out nice 99% of them time.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Vince on August 23, 2006, 09:41:15 AM
Camouflage is important, and black does not occur in nature.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Ganef on August 23, 2006, 10:49:19 AM
(http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a210/coyotetac/P5160003.jpg)

That is dead sexy, painted guns are the heat, black guns and gear are for nOObs.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: ValhallenAngel on August 23, 2006, 03:00:23 PM
Quote from: "Vince"
Camouflage is important, and black does not occur in nature.


What about burnt leaves.... (sarcasm)

I know lots of people put down black gear but I like it. I haven't had an issue with someone seeing me because it either- although I don't wear a big bulky black vest or anything. Now I have painted guns before and they are sexy, but the upkeep is a pain and repainting isn't my idea of fun and it kinda wears on the gun IMO.

Not pushing any views here, but I will concur that camoflauge is important.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Fish on August 23, 2006, 03:05:58 PM
A friend of mine is doing a SWAT impression. And his gear,BDUs, and helmet,  are all black. The only "pro" is that it looks cool. But then all the cons: its hot, can't hide, you can be spotted from a mile. But then again you can be spotted with most BDUs.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: babybackribs on August 23, 2006, 03:58:34 PM
I don't have black gear, but I do have a black gun.  I don't plan on painting it at all because painted guns look like shit.  And I know that black does appear in nature, but painted guns don't.  Painted guns always turn out to be like a blob of color.  But hey, you guys don't care about our opinions anyways.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: chainsaw on August 23, 2006, 04:13:41 PM
Multi cam guns and DIGI guns are the SH*T
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: KOBO on August 23, 2006, 04:13:51 PM
Yeah you’re right, guns don’t appear in nature, but we are not talking about object we are talking about colors. Depends on who does the paint job. A lot of the guys on here do a great job, like Ganef's gun up top, but there are those that just spray crap on their gun as well.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: PolandsLeftTesticle on August 23, 2006, 04:18:11 PM
Quote from: "babybackribs"
And I know that black does appear in nature

NATblackURE

-   He's right.

-------

-   I have a black AK-74, and although it looks pretty great the way it is, I'd love a nice dark red wood kit on it 'cause the metal parts get HOT after only an hour (and I wear gloves and a full-sleeve Urban Camo (yeah, Urban) shirt), and I'd never paint it any other color because of the maintenance and money involved.
-   Camo on guns, I believe, isn't something that is essential. It's more for the look, if anything. Suppose you're in the desert wearing desert camo and you're crouching on the ground trying to avoid contact with the enemy. Do you honestly think that the enemy will spot a tiny splinter of the black of your gun if he glances in your general direction for a moment? Most likely not, if you take into account how your eye likes to blend everything you see together; the textures of the dirt, the colored rocks, and the local vegetation should help. (this obviously wouldn't work if the guy was two feet in front of you, but if you're AVOIDING contact you'd know better than to get into that kinda situation).

Quote from: "KOBO"
A lot of the guys on here do a great job, like Ganef's gun up top ...


-   And, yeah, Ganef's gun is schweet. For some odd reason I don't oppose camo on a sniper whatsoever.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Uchiha Itachi on August 23, 2006, 04:23:09 PM
I like some of the painted guns. If the person put alot of effort and skill into it they look really cool. Adding effects like leaf and twig cut-outs. Ganef's gun would be damn hard to see if he was in a hidden postion.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: AddoAduro on August 23, 2006, 04:28:31 PM
Anyone want to paint my gun for free? :D

Painted guns pwn, when done properly.  And mine needs a new paint job. (The black looks like crap, starting to wear in spots... I think someone tried to use a crayon to touch it up.)
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: War savage on August 23, 2006, 04:33:07 PM
Quote from: "babybackribs"
I don't have black gear, but I do have a black gun.  I don't plan on painting it at all because painted guns look like s***.  And I know that black does appear in nature, but painted guns don't.  Painted guns always turn out to be like a blob of color.  But hey, you guys don't care about our opinions anyways.


Talk that Bulls**t to these SF units in Afghanistan and you might get to taste the back of one of their hands like a little B***h.

(http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y243/j_figueroa2003/Paintedgun.jpg)
(http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y243/j_figueroa2003/paintedgun3.jpg)
(http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y243/j_figueroa2003/paintedgun4.jpg)
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: busta_cap on August 23, 2006, 04:37:08 PM
YOu don't think this is sexyyy? (http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y213/hardcoresfdude/airsoft%20n%20gats/m40a1_3.jpg)
(http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y213/hardcoresfdude/airsoft%20n%20gats/m40a1_2.jpg)
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Ganef on August 23, 2006, 04:38:07 PM
I do have a bit of a grudge against painted MP5s because they just dont seem to look right painted up like you are going to hunt elk with your oversized 9mm pistol. I paint all my guns and not just my airsoft guns, because I like them painted.
Quote
but the upkeep is a pain and repainting isn't my idea of fun and it kinda wears on the gun IMO.

Some of the coolest paintjobs I have seen are ones that have worn away due to use, none of that spray on and wipe off crap I am talking aobut a metal body brought to a polish by the caress of a human hand.

All in all it sounds like you guys need to learn how to spray paint properly, get rid of your pussitis and paint your dang guns!
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: War savage on August 23, 2006, 05:02:15 PM
Quote from: "babybackribs"
I don't have black gear, but I do have a black gun.  I don't plan on painting it at all because painted guns look like s***.  And I know that black does appear in nature, but painted guns don't.  Painted guns always turn out to be like a blob of color.  But hey, you guys don't care about our opinions anyways.


WOW!! More painted guns. Courtesy of Special Forces (SF) in Afghanistan. Dork it Up some more. F**king nOOb!

(http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y243/j_figueroa2003/paintedgun8.jpg)
(http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y243/j_figueroa2003/paintedgun7.jpg)
(http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y243/j_figueroa2003/paintedgun6.jpg)
(http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y243/j_figueroa2003/paintedgun5.jpg)
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: pilz on August 23, 2006, 05:28:52 PM
Quote from: "Ganef"
(http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a210/coyotetac/P5160003.jpg)

That is dead sexy, painted guns are the heat, black guns and gear are for nOObs.


Well im sorry, but i dont want my gun looking as ugly a s**ty as that. Black is better and not for n00bs, painting your gun to look like camno is, only guns i aporve of veing painted are ak's and m14's. because tehy don't look like those ugly things that you call cool. :D
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Airsofter1 on August 23, 2006, 05:41:27 PM
Simmer down ladies.  There is no need for personal attacks.  Keep this up and you will be asking for a ban.  

Send a PM or just dont reply.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: War savage on August 23, 2006, 05:44:35 PM
He started it first!
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Fish on August 23, 2006, 05:45:32 PM
http://aex.fullmetalimage.com/gallery2/ ... temId=2650 (http://aex.fullmetalimage.com/gallery2/main.php?g2_itemId=2650)
http://aex.fullmetalimage.com/gallery2/ ... temId=2653 (http://aex.fullmetalimage.com/gallery2/main.php?g2_itemId=2653)

Pilz I have no idea what you have against painted guns, they look kick ass.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: HavHav on August 23, 2006, 07:06:17 PM
I'm glad all the AK and M14 owners have pilz approval. That totally made my night.

Until you actually goto a real airsoft game, you can't understand how the littlest things can grab your attention to the guy in full multicam walking behind those bushes. A glimmer, maybe a scope is reflecting the sun? But the most noticible thing after Safety Orange, is black.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: B00MINATOR on August 23, 2006, 07:09:56 PM
Quote from: "Fish"
http://aex.fullmetalimage.com/gallery2/main.php?g2_itemId=2650
http://aex.fullmetalimage.com/gallery2/ ... temId=2653 (http://aex.fullmetalimage.com/gallery2/main.php?g2_itemId=2653)

Pilz I have no idea what you have against painted guns, they look kick ass.


Eww.
They look like something I used to play with when I was back in Elementary school.

As for black guns, I would never paint my AK. Have you ever seen a painted AK? It would look gross...

-B00M!
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: pilz on August 23, 2006, 08:41:22 PM
i will cut the zip ties off my gun. As for muticam, im not a fan of it. And you don't have to be sarcastist when you say you have my aproval. Because you won't listen so it doesn't make any sense. Also ak's look kinda good in OD.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Ghostsequel on August 23, 2006, 08:48:22 PM
Quote from: "busta_cap"
YOu don't think this is sexyyy? (http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y213/hardcoresfdude/airsoft%20n%20gats/m40a1_3.jpg)
(http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y213/hardcoresfdude/airsoft%20n%20gats/m40a1_2.jpg)


Actually, that looks really damn sexy.

So is the one Ganef posted.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: B00MINATOR on August 23, 2006, 08:49:26 PM
Quote from: "pilz"
i will cut the zip ties off my gun. As for muticam, im not a fan of it. And you don't have to be sarcastist when you say you have my aproval. Because you won't listen so it doesn't make any sense. Also ak's look kinda good in OD.


Not the full body though.
I would consider painting the furniture again, but definitly not the full rifle.

-B00M!
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: HavHav on August 23, 2006, 08:49:40 PM
Quote from: "pilz"
And you don't have to be sarcastist when you say you have my aproval. Because you won't listen so it doesn't make any sense.


No, seriously. Ask any of my buddies. I told them I wouldn't paint my rifle until I had your approval. No sarcasm.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: pilz on August 23, 2006, 08:54:07 PM
Quote from: "B00MINATOR"
Quote from: "pilz"
i will cut the zip ties off my gun. As for muticam, im not a fan of it. And you don't have to be sarcastist when you say you have my aproval. Because you won't listen so it doesn't make any sense. Also ak's look kinda good in OD.

Not the full body though.
I would consider painting the furniture again, but definitly not the full rifle.

-B00M!


Im sorry i didn't say what i wanted to clearly, i ment to say it looks good with the furniture painted.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: B00MINATOR on August 23, 2006, 10:20:03 PM
Quote from: "War savage"
Quote from: "babybackribs"
I don't have black gear, but I do have a black gun.  I don't plan on painting it at all because painted guns look like s***.  And I know that black does appear in nature, but painted guns don't.  Painted guns always turn out to be like a blob of color.  But hey, you guys don't care about our opinions anyways.

Talk that Bulls**t to these SF units in Afghanistan and you might get to taste the back of one of their hands like a little B***h.

(http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y243/j_figueroa2003/Paintedgun.jpg)
(http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y243/j_figueroa2003/paintedgun3.jpg)
(http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y243/j_figueroa2003/paintedgun4.jpg)


Seriously ribs
You better watch it.
They might just beat the s*** out of you for making fun of their paintjob :lol:
That is rediculous.

Reminds me of myspace and the whole gig about anti-troop groups...

-B00M!
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: War savage on August 23, 2006, 10:27:38 PM
Quote from: "B00MINATOR"
Quote from: "War savage"
Quote from: "babybackribs"
I don't have black gear, but I do have a black gun.  I don't plan on painting it at all because painted guns look like s***.  And I know that black does appear in nature, but painted guns don't.  Painted guns always turn out to be like a blob of color.  But hey, you guys don't care about our opinions anyways.

Talk that Bulls**t to these SF units in Afghanistan and you might get to taste the back of one of their hands like a little B***h.

(http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y243/j_figueroa2003/Paintedgun.jpg)
(http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y243/j_figueroa2003/paintedgun3.jpg)
(http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y243/j_figueroa2003/paintedgun4.jpg)

Seriously ribs
You better watch it.
They might just beat the s*** out of you for making fun of their paintjob :lol:
That is rediculous.

Reminds me of myspace and the whole gig about anti-troop groups...

-B00M!


Not quite sure how you'r interpreting the point I was trying to make. I didn't mean in anyway that some SF guy is gonna kick some ass (shit I'll do that myself). What I was trying to say is look at the pictures of guns in real combat action being used in the military today as we speak. There is a reason they paint their guns. Not to look cool or anything. I'm sure if anyone talked the bull that was said earlier to them after it was done. There would be a few choice words said. Maybe even some action.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: babybackribs on August 23, 2006, 10:28:30 PM
I never said I'm making fun of their paintjobs, it's just that I personally don't like painted guns. (Although I have no opposition to ghillie wraps)  I just like having the option to go back to black if I want to. And as for seeing black after orange, I just shoot them before they see me.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: B00MINATOR on August 23, 2006, 10:33:32 PM
Quote from: "War savage"
Quote from: "B00MINATOR"
Quote from: "War savage"
Quote from: "babybackribs"
I don't have black gear, but I do have a black gun.  I don't plan on painting it at all because painted guns look like s***.  And I know that black does appear in nature, but painted guns don't.  Painted guns always turn out to be like a blob of color.  But hey, you guys don't care about our opinions anyways.

Talk that Bulls**t to these SF units in Afghanistan and you might get to taste the back of one of their hands like a little B***h.

(http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y243/j_figueroa2003/Paintedgun.jpg)
(http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y243/j_figueroa2003/paintedgun3.jpg)
(http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y243/j_figueroa2003/paintedgun4.jpg)

Seriously ribs
You better watch it.
They might just beat the s*** out of you for making fun of their paintjob :lol:
That is rediculous.

Reminds me of myspace and the whole gig about anti-troop groups...

-B00M!

Not quite sure how you'r interpreting the point I was trying to make. I didn't mean in anyway that some SF guy is gonna kick some ass (s*** I'll do that myself). What I was trying to say is look at the pictures of guns in real combat action being used in the military today as we speak. There is a reason they paint their guns. Not to look cool or anything. I'm sure if anyone talked the bull that was said earlier to them after it was done. There would be a few choice words said. Maybe even some action.


I interpretation fell along the lines of "say that to a SF and get knocked off your feet."

Sorry if I miss-interpreted, but that's how I saw it spell out.

-B00M!
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: War savage on August 23, 2006, 10:39:29 PM
Yeah...just remember. I'm not 15 years old. I wouldn't state anything I can't take care of myself or own up to. If I talk sH)t I'll back it up.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Cheeze_IZ_G00d on August 23, 2006, 10:47:32 PM
I personally don't care for painted guns myself. If that gives me away, so be it. After all, we are just playing a game out there anyway. If you like a painted gun, cool for you. I think that there are good paintjobs, and bad paintjobs, and only if someone has taken the care and time to make it look good should he/she get props for it. Hell, if the last thing to give me away is my gun, then I would say I am in pretty good shape. :P
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: B00MINATOR on August 23, 2006, 10:52:04 PM
Quote from: "War savage"
Yeah...just remember. I'm not 15 years old. I wouldn't state anything I can't take care of myself or own up to. If I talk sH)t I'll back it up.


I don't know if I should take this as an insult :?

-B00M!
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: War savage on August 23, 2006, 10:59:16 PM
Quote from: "B00MINATOR"
Quote from: "War savage"
Yeah...just remember. I'm not 15 years old. I wouldn't state anything I can't take care of myself or own up to. If I talk sH)t I'll back it up.

I don't know if I should take this as an insult :?

-B00M!


Lets just get past this before we say somthing we'll regret.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: B00MINATOR on August 23, 2006, 11:01:29 PM
I agree.
It's in the past.

-B00M!
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: m4J on August 24, 2006, 11:52:49 PM
Nice gun daytr8tr, really like the barret pieces, really personalizes it. Plus I here it's shooting really good. ;)
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Fish on August 25, 2006, 02:46:39 PM
Very nice collection mikey. That knife is really nice.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: babybackribs on August 25, 2006, 03:49:09 PM
It might just be me, but when I saw the System with everything on it, I thought it was an M14 EBR.  But it's not.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: pilz on August 25, 2006, 06:22:03 PM
Quote from: "babybackribs"
It might just be me, but when I saw the System with everything on it, I thought it was an M14 EBR.  But it's not.


We can't be to sure now can we.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: ValhallenAngel on August 26, 2006, 11:58:28 AM
Quote from: "Fish"
Very nice collection mikey. That knife is really nice.


Yeah that's a nice knife. Just bought mine... US Army Fighting knife part serrated with the classic leather handle and sheath... KA-BAR all the way..
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Fish on August 26, 2006, 01:09:08 PM
I'm crazy for knifes, I have like 10. I'll post a pic :).

EDIT: I can only find 2, the others are somewhere else  [smilie=armata_pdt_09.gif]

(http://img241.imageshack.us/img241/5817/picture243cl3.th.jpg) (http://img241.imageshack.us/my.php?image=picture243cl3.jpg)
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: pilz on August 27, 2006, 09:02:01 PM
Quote from: "Fish"
I'm crazy for knifes, I have like 10. I'll post a pic :).

EDIT: I can only find 2, the others are somewhere else  [smilie=armata_pdt_09.gif]

(http://img241.imageshack.us/img241/5817/picture243cl3.th.jpg) (http://img241.imageshack.us/my.php?image=picture243cl3.jpg)


ooo 2 knives... i think most everyone has atleast that many.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: B00MINATOR on August 27, 2006, 09:13:29 PM
Quote from: "pilz"
Quote from: "Fish"
I'm crazy for knifes, I have like 10. I'll post a pic :).

EDIT: I can only find 2, the others are somewhere else  [smilie=armata_pdt_09.gif]

(http://img241.imageshack.us/img241/5817/picture243cl3.th.jpg) (http://img241.imageshack.us/my.php?image=picture243cl3.jpg)

ooo 2 knives... i think most everyone has atleast that many.


And they are chinese-metal-ish.

I bet they wouldn't hold an edge very long.

I own a Gerber. Very nice blade, but I'm ready to upgrade.
Sog makes EXCELLENT knives as well.

-B00M!
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: pilz on August 27, 2006, 09:15:47 PM
mine aren't, but im thining about a H&K or a blackhawk. Mayber a butterfly. I would loose it, so im not sure yet.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: busta_cap on August 27, 2006, 09:21:21 PM
Get a Columbia RIVER!!!! They ARE the shit!! To demonstrate how well they hold a sharpening, Christian Chopped a small log(ish). Then some Rock then shaved some hair off his arm.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: GrimUSMC on August 28, 2006, 01:46:02 AM
i used to sell knives if you want a decent folding knife go columbia river but if you want something to last and backed up by a great company made in america go with benchmade. i have a benchmade 3200 mel pardue limited switchblade(black on black aircraft aluminum with g-10 inlay), kershaw saphire(titanium handle), and a columbia river m18(discontinued black on black aircraft aluminum with g-10 inlay). not including my ka-bar tanto that currently with my brother for when he re-deploys to iraq. Sog sucks and so does coldsteel dont go with them i had nothing but complaints about them from angry customers and dont get me started on their customer support. Go benchmade and youll be sure they will bend over backwards for you they always did for me.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Firehead on August 28, 2006, 11:22:48 AM
Benchmade, Ka-bar, Glock. Those are the 3 best knife companies from my experience. CRKT is good too.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: babybackribs on August 28, 2006, 04:20:31 PM
The DOCTORsight looks way to small on the m4gery.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: pilz on August 28, 2006, 04:22:13 PM
hey vince, why don't you have your crane stock on it? I thought you liked them.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: PolandsLeftTesticle on August 29, 2006, 10:45:04 PM
Yeah, back on topic:

Quote from: "Vince"
<Vince's Pictures>


I kinda liked the look of your gun, the way it was set up before this update (no, not 'cause of the Playboys). It looks like it can use some accessories, and maybe more tan, that's all. SOMETHING. But, yeah, overall:

8/10
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Vince on August 29, 2006, 10:54:12 PM
Please, don't quote the pictures.

I dunno, I like the way it is now, I have an Aimpoint CompML3 and a LaRue Tactical M68 CCO mount to mount it on coming in the mail, and that will be about the extent of my customization. I wanna keep it light and functional. The Troy sights are the finest sights money can buy, the Aimpoint is the among the finest optics you can buy, and the Tango Down is the finest vertical foregrip you can buy. All in all, I think I will be happy. Weight is important too...having to haul this for long periods of time will be easy.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: PolandsLeftTesticle on August 29, 2006, 11:09:10 PM
I guess I felt it looked a bit too lightweight and functional, but what it's got and what it doesn't have makes perfect sense. Do you use a sling for it, as well?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Vince on August 29, 2006, 11:11:23 PM
Yeah, but that's in transition, it will be a two point sling in the next three weeks.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Cheeze_IZ_G00d on August 30, 2006, 06:21:10 AM
I like it myself. HK 416 is a pretty rare gun to be finding out there.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: babybackribs on August 30, 2006, 03:32:17 PM
So Vince, are the sights real steel, and a real Tango Down grip, not the KA one?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: pilz on August 30, 2006, 03:54:23 PM
Quote from: "babybackribs"
So Vince, are the sights real steel, and a real Tango Down grip, not the KA one?


I looked up the sights, there around $300 from their site, if anyone wanted to know.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Vince on August 30, 2006, 04:09:21 PM
They are real, and they are made of steel, so, yes, they are "real steel."

If by that you mean, are they made by Troy Industries, then, yes, they are. And yes, that is a real Tango Down grip, you can see their website on the bottom.

Sorry, pilz, I didn't see your question earlier; I took the Crane stock off because the batteries are too finicky. I don't like dicking with it. I like the solid feel of the full stock anyway. The OAL is only 1.5" longer than it was with the Crane stock at the position I ran it at anyway.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: B00MINATOR on September 06, 2006, 08:13:02 PM
Pilz, I would recommend a black paint job on those 1911 grips.
I think it would match your CQB a bit better.

Just my opinion though. Nice set-up!

-B00M!
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: babybackribs on September 06, 2006, 08:28:15 PM
pilz, did you take the G3 barrel out of the G36?  And the M14 silencer looks bent down a little.  Also, take a picture of the G36 with the SL9 mag in.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: pilz on September 06, 2006, 09:18:20 PM
Quote from: "babybackribs"
pilz, did you take the G3 barrel out of the G36?  And the M14 silencer looks bent down a little.  Also, take a picture of the G36 with the SL9 mag in.


i realized i put it on wrong for the pic, i'll take a pic of the g36 once i get it back form softair. And yea i put the g3 barrel in it.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: babybackribs on September 08, 2006, 11:22:59 PM
Nice Vince.  Now all you need is a floater.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: pilz on September 08, 2006, 11:34:25 PM
Quote from: "babybackribs"
Nice Vince.  Now all you need is a floater.

No, he needs a Trijicon and a vltor crane stock.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Vince on September 08, 2006, 11:46:06 PM
Quote from: "babybackribs"
Nice Vince.  Now all you need is a floater.

What's a floater?

Quote from: "pilz"
trijicon and a vltor crane stock


Trijicon what? They make a LOOOOOT of products.

SOPMOD (Crane) stocks are made by NSWC Crane, or more likely, Lewis Machine & Tool. VLTOR makes carbine modstocks, which can be equipped with one of two attachments, one of which, yes, create a cheekweld similar to, yet different in execution and appearance than the SOPMOD stock. I have an VLTOR Clubfoot Modstock already, no need for another. That being said, I am probably putting my CA Crane stock back on until I can figure out a way to fit a Defensive Edge Sully Stock onto my AEG.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: pilz on September 08, 2006, 11:52:09 PM
4x32 Trijicon. I think he means free float RAS.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Vince on September 08, 2006, 11:56:05 PM
You mean an ACOG? I dunno, magnification doesn't seem necessary in airsoft, although I would like one for my AR sometime down the road.

I already have a free floating handguard/railed forend.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: pilz on September 09, 2006, 12:14:16 AM
Quote from: "Vince"
You mean an ACOG? I dunno, magnification doesn't seem necessary in airsoft, although I would like one for my AR sometime down the road.

I already have a free floating handguard/railed forend.


Yea a ACOG, they just look cool.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Raith on September 09, 2006, 01:52:35 AM
Quote from: "pilz"
4x32 Trijicon. I think he means free float RAS.


I think he meant a turd.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: babybackribs on September 10, 2006, 09:22:28 AM
Quote from: "Raith"

I think he meant a turd.

Exactly.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: babybackribs on September 21, 2006, 12:56:28 AM
seph6885, I like the AK, except for the mag.  Other than that, it looks great.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: seph6885 on September 21, 2006, 01:25:17 AM
thats the mag the guy gave me. do you not like the brown? i like the color complement. i plan on getting normal 47 mags anyway.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: pilz on September 21, 2006, 06:54:50 AM
thats a cool ak, you should get a m4 stock for it.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: seph6885 on September 21, 2006, 11:24:21 AM
why would i do that? it would look ridiculous. not to mention losing the ability to store large batteries.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: babybackribs on September 21, 2006, 03:10:31 PM
Not if you put a crane stock on it.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Cheeze_IZ_G00d on September 21, 2006, 03:11:49 PM
Quote from: "pilz"
thats a cool ak, you should get a m4 stock for it.


Why?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: PolandsLeftTesticle on September 21, 2006, 03:13:58 PM
- The M4 stock would better match what you've got on the gun, but I agree with ya, Seph, it wouldn't feel right. I bet'cha know that G&G AK-74 stocks are extra-long for 9.6v battery storage, if you're looking for a bigger upgrade.

\PLT
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: seph6885 on September 21, 2006, 05:03:14 PM
Quote from: "PolandsLeftTesticle"
- The M4 stock would better match what you've got on the gun\PLT


if you're referring to this useless rail thing i have, thats what came with the gun, i didnt put it on there willingly. i think its pretty stupid.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: babybackribs on September 21, 2006, 10:45:37 PM
Did you get it used?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: alex on September 25, 2006, 02:39:09 PM
Rocketboy, is there an advantage to having the rear sight on your HK416 on backwards?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: pilz on September 25, 2006, 03:20:52 PM
Quote from: "alex"
Rocketboy, is there an advantage to having the rear sight on your HK416 on backwards?

I think there is in some way, or why would he have it that way, unless he put it on wrong.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: babybackribs on September 25, 2006, 05:10:32 PM
Elbows, what kind of L85 is that?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Elbows on September 25, 2006, 10:10:52 PM
Dunno where my post went...but its the GG model.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: babybackribs on October 05, 2006, 10:12:24 PM
Hey Bow-Tie, what's with the white tape?  And how's the STAR working out?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Bow-tie Assasin on October 05, 2006, 10:15:20 PM
Quote from: "babybackribs"
Hey Bow-Tie, what's with the white tape?  And how's the STAR working out?


The tape is to prevent the lid of the box mag from popping off and bb's spilling all over. The tape on the grip is to keep it secure because it's a VERY cheap plasticy grip. The gun itself feels nice for plastic though and it works great.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Ares on October 09, 2006, 12:55:56 PM
just put some up. you all know what the weapon on the bottom is, but the top one is weird. CA gearbox, SRC outter barrel, TM body and stock, Delta gears. its a mess.

on the CQ, i put a G&P red dot in the riser i got. put what used to be in that riser on the mutt. textured rail covers and the UTG fore grip. all i need nor the CQ is a sling, mags, and battery, and tight bore.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Vince on October 09, 2006, 01:02:30 PM
Grayson, did you for some reason flip that picture in Photoshop?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Ares on October 09, 2006, 01:08:49 PM
oh.. no, thats the cameras fault. its built into my computer and for some reason it leaves the pic mirrored

((all fixed))
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Fish on November 01, 2006, 06:17:04 PM
(http://airsoftlouisville.org/customak.JPG)


Jesus! You need to go to the red-alliance...
http://www.red-alliance.net/phpBB2/view ... light=ugly (http://www.red-alliance.net/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=4636&highlight=ugly)

EDIT: Hey, I don't want to sound like a d!ck. It's just that a wood kit would have been a much better choice. AKs weren't made to look like that. It's not realistic. That looks like a cross between an M4 and an AK. To me, it looks wrong, a "tactical" AK  :?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: TheStenGun on November 01, 2006, 07:24:44 PM
Hmmm, that is certainly the first time you have ever voiced a concern for realism...

Extra points for the guy with the silliest looking scope in airsoft trashing another man's AK!
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Vince on November 01, 2006, 07:27:59 PM
Quote from: "TheStenGun"
Hmmm, that is certainly the first time you have ever voiced a concern for realism...

Extra points for the guy with the silliest looking scope in airsoft trashing another man's AK!


Now, now, he's being brought around, I have had good success forcing my milsim on him.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: TheStenGun on November 01, 2006, 07:39:09 PM
You're right Vince; teach people with reward, not punishment.

To Fish: Good job, Fish! Keep up the good work! I am sorry for what I said earlier, you ARE getting better!
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Fish on November 01, 2006, 08:43:49 PM
[smilie=armata_pdt_34.gif] thanks... definetly working on it. As for my scope, I take it off now and then.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: B00MINATOR on November 01, 2006, 10:52:37 PM
Quote from: "Fish"
[smilie=armata_pdt_34.gif] I take it off now and then.


Heh.


Seriosuly though, the Tactical Spetz looks great.
If any of the AK series could pull it off, the spetz is the one.

Just laying my opinion out on the table for y'all.

-B00M!
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Ares on November 03, 2006, 07:28:41 AM
hooray redwolf!! what an awesome M14, it looks sick vince. but the piss in the toilet could have been left out... imo  :lol:
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: babybackribs on November 03, 2006, 05:00:16 PM
Quote from: "bassick1"
hooray redwolf!! what an awesome M14, it looks sick vince. but the piss in the toilet could have been left out... imo  :lol:

I dunno, it's kinda erotic.  :lol:
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Ares on November 03, 2006, 05:52:35 PM
hahah good lord, do i laugh? or do i vomit?  :lol:
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Farslayer on November 03, 2006, 07:32:17 PM
Quote from: "bassick1"
hahah good lord, do i laugh? or do i vomit?  :lol:
Don't laugh....he's got a "condition".... :cry:
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: babybackribs on November 04, 2006, 03:20:04 PM
Quote from: "Farslayer"
Quote from: "bassick1"
hahah good lord, do i laugh? or do i vomit?  :lol:
Don't laugh....he's got a "condition".... :cry:

So?!  It's a "fun" condition!   :lol:  I get to hang out with Mickey and Minnie and any other person I want to in my mind.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Gantaliano Hoff on November 07, 2006, 08:59:50 PM
Is it just me or is that the same weapon you've had for a while with A LOT of miles on it...

Dude Matt, I love that sling retention system. Is that homemade?

Also what vertical grip is that?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: pilz on November 07, 2006, 09:09:59 PM
Quote from: "Gantaliano Hoff"
Is it just me or is that the same weapon you've had for a while with A LOT of miles on it...

Dude Matt, I love that sling retention system. Is that homemade?

Also what vertical grip is that?

The vertical grip looks like a tango down.
http://www.sgcusa.com/cgi-bin/sgcusa.cg ... 00303.html (http://www.sgcusa.com/cgi-bin/sgcusa.cgi/855727000303.html)
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Raith on November 07, 2006, 09:29:31 PM
Quote from: "Gantaliano Hoff"
Is it just me or is that the same weapon you've had for a while with A LOT of miles on it...
I got it 198 days ago.  I've used it in maybe 6-7 games since.
Quote
Dude Matt, I love that sling retention system. Is that homemade?
The sling was made by David.  The front sling mount is a G&P copy of a Knight's QD sling swivel and the rear sling mount is a Tangodown PR-4 (http://tangodown.com/shop/product_info.php?cPath=22&products_id=40).
Quote
Also what vertical grip is that?

Its a Tangodown BGV-MK46 Vertical Foregrip (http://tangodown.com/shop/product_info.php?cPath=26&products_id=49).
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Ganef on November 07, 2006, 11:19:09 PM
Man... nobody noticed the painted mag...

Looks great Raith. I await further testing to decide if I want to do that to mine.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Ganef on November 14, 2006, 11:05:20 AM
pilz,
can you even see through your optic with that BUIS in the way?

Do these things now!!:

1) get rid of the orange.

2) paint the rest of your gun to match your foregrip.

Why show your sure fire lights with no way of attaching them to your gat?

that is an awfully big case for your cell phone.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: PolandsLeftTesticle on November 14, 2006, 12:31:21 PM
- Pilz likes to buy and sell and trade and whatnot. If he plans to stick to this gun, though, I'd imagine he might consider painting it.
Right?

\PLT
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Raith on November 14, 2006, 12:56:24 PM
That optic does look kinda odd that far back, but if you like it, its cool.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: babybackribs on November 14, 2006, 03:30:56 PM
Quote from: "Raith"
That optic does look kinda odd that far back, but if you like it, its cool.

That's what I keep telling him!  He says that since Doc does it, it must be the right way to have it on your gun.  And Poland, he won't paint it.  he's just getting tan accessories for it like a tan crane stock, rail covers, and ergo grip.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Gantaliano Hoff on November 14, 2006, 04:15:32 PM
...nice phone...tactical.


Paint it dude. All the cool kids are doing it. :P
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: pilz on November 14, 2006, 05:35:52 PM
Quote from: "babybackribs"
Quote from: "Raith"
That optic does look kinda odd that far back, but if you like it, its cool.
That's what I keep telling him!  He says that since Doc does it, it must be the right way to have it on your gun.  And Poland, he won't paint it.  he's just getting tan accessories for it like a tan crane stock, rail covers, and ergo grip.

Actualy, i like it there becasue i can aim without shutting an eye, if its farther foward the dot gets bigger because its farther back, and it works for me so its good. I may eventualy change it once i get my gun Tan and looking good. Im getting the Tan stock magpul tan railcovers, tan aimpoint cover, a noveske, and a gonzo battery. I will have those soon.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: babybackribs on December 01, 2006, 10:49:37 PM
Quote from: "Brando"
i added an acog what you think

I think you need to stop buying guns.  You're turning into pilz, except you keep yours.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Fish on December 01, 2006, 11:03:47 PM
Brando, can you post a pic of all your guns?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Brando on December 01, 2006, 11:32:39 PM
um sure. i will put one up tomorrow.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Fish on December 01, 2006, 11:50:57 PM
Cool, thank you. All the pics of your guns that you posted in the past were pretty sick. I lost track of how many you had, lol.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Fish on December 04, 2006, 06:18:17 PM
Those are nice! My favorite are the shrike, and the M14.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: PolandsLeftTesticle on December 07, 2006, 03:34:42 AM
- gdaqb, I envy your collection. That AK-47 is a little too modernized for my tastes, but if that's how you'd like it, that's how you got it. At Red-Alliance.net you can get a lot of sources on AK customization if you feel like looking into the process. I'll always consider the M14 to be a beautiful gun.

\PLT
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Fish on December 16, 2006, 07:37:14 PM
Pilz, loose the orange tip already. But yeah good choice, looks nice. Keep it the way it is, don't add optics to it.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: babybackribs on December 16, 2006, 09:10:37 PM
I think it would look better with a darker finish on the wood.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Vince on December 16, 2006, 09:20:02 PM
The blonde wood is kind of cool. Has a very like, new, American AK type look.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: pilz on December 16, 2006, 10:47:59 PM
Quote from: "Fish"
Pilz, loose the orange tip already. But yeah good choice, looks nice. Keep it the way it is, don't add optics to it.

Since I just got it ealier today, and after that i whent to work. I haven't had any time to remove it. give me a few days, and it will be gone.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: babybackribs on December 20, 2006, 04:37:58 PM
schmuckduck- very nice paint job.  How did you keep the trades visible?  And I think you need more tan in it.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: B00MINATOR on December 20, 2006, 07:11:09 PM
Quote from: "babybackribs"
schmuckduck- very nice paint job.  How did you keep the trades visible?  And I think you need more tan in it.


You can use a white crayon.
By scribbling the white crayon onto the trades and wiping it clean with a  hot cloth, it will give you that "white trades effect."

You can also use White Out, however, this method is VERY hard to get right.

-B00M!
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Vince on December 20, 2006, 07:20:35 PM
Or just white acrylic paint and then saliva fingers or a wet eraser.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: babybackribs on December 20, 2006, 11:26:23 PM
I used white craft paint, and I just wiped it off.  It left no residue, except where I wanted it.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: schmuckduck on December 27, 2006, 04:37:18 AM
Thanks, I kept the trades visable by painting in layers. First, I taped the areas I wanted to stay black which also contained the trades. Then, I painted green. Added more tape to get the design I wanted and finished off with brown. Gun was to brown after first coat of paint went on, so I had to mist the whole gun with a final layer of green. It could use a bit more tan I agree.  Still a work in progress. Im sure I will be touching it up from time to time.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: B00MINATOR on January 16, 2007, 03:47:19 PM
Quote from: "pilz"
Nice Sig.. don't want to get hit by those hollow points.


I rather not get hit by any ballestic projectile...personally.

-B00M!
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: pilz on January 21, 2007, 12:53:02 AM
Quote from: "Vince"
(http://www.endyourself.com/DSC013651.jpg)

This picture came out like, artsier than I intended.

Still the same old lowbrow toilet, though.

Nice now you have a sophmod toilet. I mean m14.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: nosmo on January 21, 2007, 01:13:28 AM
Very nice Vince.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: babybackribs on January 21, 2007, 08:44:45 AM
What kit is that?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: nosmo on January 21, 2007, 05:08:42 PM
it's an EBR kit, i have no idea which brand though.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: babybackribs on January 21, 2007, 07:27:23 PM
Quote from: "nosmo"
it's an EBR kit

I know that.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Vince on January 21, 2007, 07:31:49 PM
G&P.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Farslayer on January 21, 2007, 08:02:49 PM
Beautiful Vince.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: nosmo on January 21, 2007, 08:41:27 PM
Quote from: "babybackribs"
Quote from: "nosmo"
it's an EBR kit
I know that.


It's not like your question specified that you knew it was an EBR  ;)
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: -MAD- SARGE on January 21, 2007, 10:09:18 PM
Quote from: "Vince"
This picture came out like, artsier than I intended.


Artsy Fartsy  :shock:

Nice kit, but now I can add two more things to my list to never touch again.  Plus good luck trying to sell it, that is if you ever wanted to.  :lol:

Ah, but you got to love the pad, all 10x5 ft of it  8)
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: chainsaw on January 21, 2007, 10:26:06 PM
Id buy the kit  8)
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: B00MINATOR on February 05, 2007, 04:34:05 PM
Bassick, I'm loving the CQB.

Who make is that reflex site?

-Brian
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Ares on February 05, 2007, 04:38:06 PM
thanx man :) i think its AVP or AMP the emblem on the box makes it hard to distinguish, but it has 4 reticle options. I got it at APD for 60. i like it much more than an aimpoint, because its all open, theres no tunnel vision, making it really easy to acquire a target
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Airsofter1 on February 07, 2007, 08:08:37 PM
Quote
Thats my REAL M249 issued by the government. Its got a short barrel, collapsing stock, rail system, an M145 ELCAN, and an AN/PEQ2A on it.


M4 stocks on SAWs are gay.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Vince on February 07, 2007, 08:09:38 PM
Quote from: "Airsofter1"
Quote
Thats my REAL M249 issued by the government. Its got a short barrel, collapsing stock, rail system, an M145 ELCAN, and an AN/PEQ2A on it.

M4 stocks on SAWs are gay.


THAT WELL WITIN UR PAYGRADE
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: babybackribs on February 07, 2007, 08:13:43 PM
Quote from: "Firehead"
Thats my REAL M249 issued by the government. Its got a short barrel, collapsing stock, rail system, an M145 ELCAN, and an AN/PEQ2A on it.

They let you take it home?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Firehead on February 07, 2007, 08:24:36 PM
No, they don't let me take it home.

Its not an M4 stock. Its an M249 stock. Therefore, not gay.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: babybackribs on February 07, 2007, 08:55:38 PM
Quote from: "Firehead"
No, they don't let me take it home.

Its not an M4 stock. Its an M249 stock. Therefore, not gay.

Those poopy heads.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: m4J on February 07, 2007, 09:36:05 PM
Firehead, whats the string around the peq for?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Vince on February 07, 2007, 09:38:28 PM
Keep $2,000 of gov't money on the gun.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: m4J on February 07, 2007, 10:32:49 PM
gotcha, low tech solution for a high tech piece of equip.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: babybackribs on February 07, 2007, 11:07:59 PM
Quote from: "Vince"
Keep $2,000 of gov't money on the gun.

Does it fall off easily?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: pilz on February 07, 2007, 11:35:41 PM
claim it got lost or somthing... Its only the goverment.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Firehead on February 08, 2007, 09:37:25 AM
Its 550 cord to keep the AN/PEQ attached to my weapon IF the rail grabber fails or loosens up, causing it to fall off.

Pilz, its called a statement of charges. If I loose it or damage it, the government takes it out of my paycheck. Then my squad leader takes it out of my ass. I think i'd rather throw some cord around it to keep it on my weapon.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Wolfan8or on February 08, 2007, 05:16:19 PM
is that charger charging anything on the gun or is it just there? jw
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: RangerBob on February 08, 2007, 07:32:26 PM
That's a power cord for a laptop I'm pretty certain, I know it's nothing for the gun.  It also disappears behind the cabinet there in the corner presumably to a wall outlet.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: -MAD- SARGE on February 08, 2007, 10:59:16 PM
Na, he's just charging his 480volt 100,000 mah battery that is required to run that thing.  Surprisingly, such a small cord can provide enough juice to charge that up in a timely manner.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: babybackribs on February 08, 2007, 11:19:50 PM
Quote from: "-MAD- SARGE"
Na, he's just charging his 480volt 100,000 mah battery that is required to run that thing.  Surprisingly, such a small cord can provide enough juice to charge that up in a timely manner.

For some reason, I was under the assumption that those things ran on bullets.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Ares on February 09, 2007, 12:27:22 AM
Quote from: "babybackribs"
Quote from: "-MAD- SARGE"
Na, he's just charging his 480volt 100,000 mah battery that is required to run that thing.  Surprisingly, such a small cord can provide enough juice to charge that up in a timely manner.
For some reason, I was under the assumption that those things ran on bullets.


psh lame.... he should have at least 520V 250,000MAH
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Wolfan8or on February 09, 2007, 07:57:37 PM
i didnt know if the anpeq had to be charged or w/e, i agree, stupid question, how n00bish of me
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Greenmarine on February 20, 2007, 01:08:13 PM
how long have you guys been messing with you guns to get them like that :?:
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: skate n shoot on February 20, 2007, 02:39:22 PM
Quote from: "Greenmarine"
how long have you guys been messing with you guns to get them like that :?:


not that long, for me its been a couple months cause i have to work crap jobs to get the money but others it may be longer or shorter
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: pilz on February 20, 2007, 03:49:42 PM
Quote from: "Greenmarine"
how long have you guys been messing with you guns to get them like that :?:

A month or 2, depeding on if the items I need are instock, and depending on if somthing breaks.... Its all good none of the acessories are needed, but they make it look "tacticool" [tac-ty-cool].
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: babybackribs on February 22, 2007, 10:02:48 PM
Pilz, you need to get rid of the rear BUIS.  It has no purpose.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: pilz on February 22, 2007, 10:12:07 PM
Quote from: "babybackribs"
Pilz, you need to get rid of the rear BUIS.  It has no purpose.

But I like it.. It looks awkward with just an aimpoint in my opinion.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: -MAD- SARGE on February 23, 2007, 08:47:32 AM
Ah kids rationalizations, you got to love it!
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: AddoAduro on February 23, 2007, 10:29:17 AM
Hey, you've gotta consider the looks too...  I don't want to be running around with an ugly gun... Like a Famas. lol
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: XavierMace on February 23, 2007, 12:58:03 PM
If you want to see an ugly FAMAS, go to ASR.  You got the classics, like a home made RIS, carry handle scope mount, and a FAMAS with a G36c handle.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: -MAD- SARGE on February 23, 2007, 04:22:52 PM
I want functionality first. If it looks cool, that is a distant second. For the most part, things that are very useful and have real use are usually "cool" anyways.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: B00MINATOR on February 28, 2007, 09:58:06 PM
Wow.
Tokyo Marui Car-15!
Those are nearly impossible to find now-a-days.

Nice little rarity you have there.

I wonder if he was able to find the Sig 550 or 551 over there.

-Brian
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Farslayer on February 28, 2007, 10:03:12 PM
Quote from: "B00MINATOR"
Wow.
Tokyo Marui Car-15!
Those are nearly impossible to find now-a-days.

Nice little rarity you have there.

I wonder if he was able to find the Sig 550 or 551 over there.

-Brian
I'm afraid to even paint the thing...going to make a "gun ghille"... :roll:
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Vince on February 28, 2007, 10:07:45 PM
You got an AEG!

Now come to some games!
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Farslayer on February 28, 2007, 10:08:43 PM
Quote from: "Vince"
You got an AEG!

Now come to some games!
:oops:

Thanks for not rubbing it in.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: pilz on February 28, 2007, 10:17:29 PM
Now all it needs is a metal body.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Farslayer on February 28, 2007, 10:20:51 PM
Quote from: "pilz"
Now all it needs is a metal body.
Ummm...the whole thing is metal dude.  except for the tube and the stock.  Pretty solid.

On another note...it came with this 8.4, 600 mAh battery and very simple wall charger.  How long will it take, assuming it is dead, to get a full charge?  I don't know this battey's history.  

I know that this charger won't charge my new 1400 Nimh pack.

Thanks.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Vince on February 28, 2007, 10:26:24 PM
What's the output of the charger?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: pilz on February 28, 2007, 10:28:11 PM
Quote from: "Farslayer"
Quote from: "pilz"
Now all it needs is a metal body.
Ummm...the whole thing is metal dude.  except for the tube and the stock.  Pretty solid.

On another note...it came with this 8.4, 600 mAh battery and very simple wall charger.  How long will it take, assuming it is dead, to get a full charge?  I don't know this battey's history.  

I know that this charger won't charge my new 1400 Nimh pack.

Thanks.

Sorry im just a little slow.... jk, anyway looks cool and it's a collectors item. I have seen a few on ebay, but never thought to get one.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Farslayer on February 28, 2007, 10:29:09 PM
Quote from: "Vince"
What's the output of the charger?
all the text is in japanese (Mikey?  little help?).

It does have this :  6~7 on the top and AC 100 V on the side, but the rest is japanese.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Vince on February 28, 2007, 10:34:27 PM
Put it on the charger until it gets warm then.

Without knowing the output of the charger, it's impossible to know how long it would take to charge the battery.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Farslayer on February 28, 2007, 10:36:20 PM
Quote from: "Vince"
Put it on the charger until it gets warm then.

Without knowing the output of the charger, it's impossible to know how long it would take to charge the battery.
Thanks.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: B00MINATOR on February 28, 2007, 11:07:45 PM
Quote from: "Farslayer"
Quote from: "B00MINATOR"
Wow.
Tokyo Marui Car-15!
Those are nearly impossible to find now-a-days.

Nice little rarity you have there.

I wonder if he was able to find the Sig 550 or 551 over there.

-Brian
I'm afraid to even paint the thing...going to make a "gun ghille"... :roll:


Definitly don't paint paint it.
The Car is far too beutiful :)

Man, some people get all the luck.

-Brian
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: XavierMace on February 28, 2007, 11:32:00 PM
Just thought I would mention I have a Sig 550 and a friend has a 551.  Both burst chips still work fine.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: babybackribs on March 01, 2007, 10:54:58 PM
Vince-
Who makes that SCAR?  And how do you like the feel of the design?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Ares on March 01, 2007, 10:57:10 PM
Quote from: "babybackribs"
Vince-
Who makes that SCAR?  And how do you like the feel of the design?


and WHY is it not on the toilet??
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Farslayer on March 01, 2007, 11:10:38 PM
Quote from: "pilz"
Quote from: "Farslayer"
Quote from: "pilz"
Now all it needs is a metal body.
Ummm...the whole thing is metal dude.  except for the tube and the stock.  Pretty solid.

On another note...it came with this 8.4, 600 mAh battery and very simple wall charger.  How long will it take, assuming it is dead, to get a full charge?  I don't know this battey's history.  

I know that this charger won't charge my new 1400 Nimh pack.

Thanks.
Sorry im just a little slow.... jk, anyway looks cool and it's a collectors item. I have seen a few on ebay, but never thought to get one.


I'm sorry Pilz, you are correct, it is plastic.  It is so heavy and solidly put together, it felt like metal.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: babybackribs on March 01, 2007, 11:11:23 PM
Quote from: "Ares"
and WHY is it not on the toilet??

Maybe the toilet had a butt baby in it that wouldn't go down.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Ares on March 01, 2007, 11:16:12 PM
..like that would stop him...
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Cheeze_IZ_G00d on March 02, 2007, 03:17:23 PM
It's because that is Paul's gun, and the photo was taken at JT Tempe.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Ares on March 02, 2007, 04:19:42 PM
oh, rgr that
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: driver5 on March 03, 2007, 12:18:22 AM
(http://img85.imageshack.us/img85/4029/1445303964736759420xg5.th.jpg) (http://img85.imageshack.us/my.php?image=1445303964736759420xg5.jpg)

my Well m4.... slightly modified :)
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: PygmyXile on March 15, 2007, 05:58:05 PM
just to explain my guns in detail... the type 96 has a 500 fps cylinder kit in it, along with a bushnell 6-18x50 scope on it. the famas has an m100, metal bushings, deepfire titanium piston, and systema helical gears.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Ghostsequel on March 16, 2007, 01:01:01 AM
That FAMAS actually looks pretty cool.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: PygmyXile on March 17, 2007, 10:27:08 AM
i removed the iron sites leaving just the picanny rail, but i need to either re-tap one of teh wholes in the gearbox shell or get a new shell. i also took off the extended outer barrel, considering the fact that it just becomes a nuisance in matches.

EDIT: which famas?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: bopper9052 on March 17, 2007, 12:47:52 PM
Just wondering if that mg36 has a large foregrip or the stock length?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Nautic on March 22, 2007, 10:41:02 PM
Sorry just saw this, that's a STAR handguard, it's as long as the stock one you get, it's just larger width wise.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Dust2Dust on March 24, 2007, 04:45:04 PM
I was just looking through the picture thread...

Jesus Christ, Vince.  Whatever you do for work, any openings for the summer? lol.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: XavierMace on March 30, 2007, 09:19:11 AM
SilentDragon:

Nice job on the RPK, it's nice to see a little variation from the normal AK's.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Speedy on April 01, 2007, 12:58:40 PM
Pilz
Bro.......  :?
Please tell me that thing sin't yours...........
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: pilz on April 01, 2007, 01:05:42 PM
Quote from: "Speedy"
Pilz
Bro.......  :?
Please tell me that thing sin't yours...........

Haha.. I wouldn't make somthing this ugly..... Its a guy on another forum. He put all of those on for a top called ugly weapon photo's. I mean I have had ugly weapons but nothing like that.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Speedy on April 02, 2007, 01:28:44 PM
I agree. I hade ugly guns but D*** this is just not pretty to look at.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: -MAD- SARGE on April 02, 2007, 05:02:50 PM
Why put an external tank on a bolt action rifle? Can't possibly tell me that your going to shoot that much.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Vince on April 02, 2007, 05:05:23 PM
You want the flow to be as consistent as possible.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: -MAD- SARGE on April 02, 2007, 06:38:02 PM
That was the only answer I would accept and you answered it for him : )
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Farslayer on April 02, 2007, 10:28:50 PM
Quote from: "-MAD- SARGE"
Why put an external tank on a bolt action rifle? Can't possibly tell me that your going to shoot that much.
Can you regulate the FPS with that also...like for a longer shot (withing AA FPS limits of course)?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: alex on April 02, 2007, 11:09:13 PM
Yes you can. The first regulator goes from 0-300PSI, and the sub reg goes from 0-100PSI (and is finger adjustable).
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Raven1 on April 02, 2007, 11:19:44 PM
Quote from: "alex"
Yes you can. The first regulator goes from 0-300PSI, and the sub reg goes from 0-100PSI (and is finger adjustable).


He Heh,

He said "Finger Adjustable,,,"
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: tacticalairsoftmagazine on April 03, 2007, 05:05:39 PM
Those are some nice pics you guys have.  If anyone is interested, I am having a new airsoft magazine come out with a readers pics section.  If you submit your picture, it might make it in.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: B00MINATOR on April 04, 2007, 11:07:40 PM
You know you're a Scottsdale kid when:


Quote from: "babybackribs"
(http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b374/babybackribs/CIMG0219.jpg)

List of upgrades is waaayyy too long for this post.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: m4J on April 04, 2007, 11:23:34 PM
"You know you're a Scottsdale kid when:"

LMAO :lol:
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: babybackribs on April 05, 2007, 03:17:24 PM
Quote from: "B00MINATOR"
You know you're a Scottsdale kid when:


Quote from: "babybackribs"
(http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b374/babybackribs/CIMG0219.jpg)

List of upgrades is waaayyy too long for this post.

What of it?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Ghostsequel on April 05, 2007, 05:02:17 PM
I think he's getting at the fact that you're a rich kid whose parents have given him thousands of dollars to spend on airsoft, because a 16 year old probably couldn't afford all that on their own.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: babybackribs on April 05, 2007, 05:33:29 PM
Quote from: "Ghostsequel"
I think he's getting at the fact that you're a rich kid whose parents have given him thousands of dollars to spend on airsoft, because a 16 year old probably couldn't afford all that on their own.

Actually, I HAVE bought all of that on my own.  But you guys don't care, because I am just another kid under 18 that is taking up space on these boards.  Oh, and by the way, I live in Phoenix.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Kilo11 on April 05, 2007, 05:33:33 PM
Sweet Guns though BTW
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Ghostsequel on April 05, 2007, 06:52:33 PM
Quote from: "babybackribs"
Quote from: "Ghostsequel"
I think he's getting at the fact that you're a rich kid whose parents have given him thousands of dollars to spend on airsoft, because a 16 year old probably couldn't afford all that on their own.
Actually, I HAVE bought all of that on my own.  But you guys don't care, because I am just another kid under 18 that is taking up space on these boards.  Oh, and by the way, I live in Phoenix.


Not going to get into an argument.  Nice guns, I will say.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Speedy on April 06, 2007, 02:43:31 PM
Guys.......
Who gives a flying fuck where your from, how you bought your guns or what guns you own and the price and all that shit. Lets just play this sport aight guys.
And yes you have very nice modest set up going there i will give you that, but quit doggin on people and play the damn sport.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: studdermonkey on April 06, 2007, 02:48:57 PM
Quote from: "Speedy"
Guys.......
Who gives a flying **** where your from, how you bought your guns or what guns you own and the price and all that s***. Lets just play this sport aight guys.
And yes you have very nice modest set up going there i will give you that, but quit doggin on people and play the damn sport.


Are you saying this because you live in Tucson?


All this makes me miss my CQBR.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Farslayer on April 06, 2007, 02:53:30 PM
Quote from: "-MAD- SARGE"
Why put an external tank on a bolt action rifle? Can't possibly tell me that your going to shoot that much.
to be honest, that thing looks sick....I hope it works as good as it looks.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Speedy on April 06, 2007, 10:11:24 PM
Like i said.......Doesn't matter where your from.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Trashcan on April 07, 2007, 06:56:12 AM
Quote from: "nosmo"
Got myself a Marui Socom 16
 :)

(http://i89.photobucket.com/albums/k220/ShatteredSpear/Airsoft0701002.jpg)[/img]


What are your thoughts on this gun? All I've read so far has been good... any immediate negatives I should know about?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Cheeze_IZ_G00d on April 07, 2007, 08:13:44 AM
Quote from: "Trashcan"
Quote from: "nosmo"
Got myself a Marui Socom 16
 :)

(http://i89.photobucket.com/albums/k220/ShatteredSpear/Airsoft0701002.jpg)[/img]

What are your thoughts on this gun? All I've read so far has been good... any immediate negatives I should know about?


How about that couch? :P

From what I understand, the Soc 16 is some of the finest that Marui has produced, which says a lot since Marui was great to begin with.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: nosmo on April 07, 2007, 10:07:23 AM
It was the best stock gun that I've ever owned.  I've got an M100 in it now with a Prometheus tight bore and I'm more than impressed.

I would recommend the couch too Shane  :lol:


There aren't really any immediate negatives other than there aren't that many basic internal components available as of now, but that will probably change.  Just be REALLY careful when you take it apart because this thing called the selector arm is relatively fragile.

And if you have issues ordering overseas, some people do, you won't be able to buy upgrade parts for it.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: pilz on April 07, 2007, 05:02:30 PM
Quote from: "nosmo"
It was the best stock gun that I've ever owned.  I've got an M100 in it now with a Prometheus tight bore and I'm more than impressed.

I would recommend the couch too Shane  :lol:


There aren't really any immediate negatives other than there aren't that many basic internal components available as of now, but that will probably change.  Just be REALLY careful when you take it apart because this thing called the selector arm is relatively fragile.

And if you have issues ordering overseas, some people do, you won't be able to buy upgrade parts for it.

I can't wait until I get mine in the nest week or so. I will replace the selector arm since they make the metal one but its $38. So if it breaks there is not choice really.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Trashcan on April 07, 2007, 05:16:15 PM
It wont be in the next week, but I can definitely see one of those in my future.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: m4J on April 14, 2007, 01:15:59 AM
I heard the finish isn't to good on the soc 16, is there any truth to this?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Vince on April 14, 2007, 01:20:11 AM
Well, that's a pretty broad stroke, there.

The finish on the receiver is top notch, until it gets wet. Then you're fairly fucked.

The finish on the stock is decent, but it achieves it's color on both the green and black stocks by way of a clear coat over a base coat, and the clear coat can get scratched off after awhile, creating a non-uniform appearance.

Easy solution -- paint that bitch.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: nosmo on April 14, 2007, 12:06:55 PM
The finish on it before i painted it wasn't too bad.  It's called "sand stone" finish or something like that.  Anywho, I painted mine in khaki with krylon paint and it's much better like Vince said.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: -MAD- SARGE on April 15, 2007, 09:25:20 PM
Ah, well I see Vince has christened it already  :)

How does this one, with a second regulator, compare to the other setup/gun you had?  And Im gona have to shoot it a bit : )
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: pilz on April 15, 2007, 10:19:41 PM
Hey Vince is that a Escort mp5?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Vince on April 15, 2007, 10:20:42 PM
Yes. Escort MP5A4.

I built it the week before last.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: pilz on April 15, 2007, 10:26:15 PM
Didn't you also have a Escort mp5 last year for LCV?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Vince on April 15, 2007, 10:27:15 PM
Quote from: "pilz"
Didn't you also have a Escort mp5 last year for LCV?


That was an MP5SD5. I didn't use it.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: pilz on April 15, 2007, 10:28:18 PM
Quote from: "Vince"
Quote from: "pilz"
Didn't you also have a Escort mp5 last year for LCV?

That was an MP5SD5. I didn't use it.

Oh ok are you using this one at LC or your m14?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Vince on April 15, 2007, 10:29:16 PM
Whatever I can kill Tribals best with.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: usafcajun on April 15, 2007, 11:14:22 PM
Quote from: "Vince"
Whatever I can kill Tribals best with.


Bring it Shirley!  Got me a new 'Easy Button' in addition to an AK. :)   This was a pic right out of the box....took a bit to get the orange tip broken free from the super glue that was used.  

(http://i83.photobucket.com/albums/j300/AMSOG/AMSOG%20General%20Photos/Cajun/DSC01973.jpg)

Durka durka jihad!  Long live Elder Longgrear!
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Vince on April 15, 2007, 11:21:07 PM
Quote from: "usafcajun"
Bring it Shirley!


What do you say we lay some odds on the outcome of LC6?

...if the Allies win, well, you come to a game...

Nevermind, nothing quite so severe, this is a game after all.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: usafcajun on April 16, 2007, 01:04:23 PM
Quote from: "Vince"
Quote from: "usafcajun"
Bring it Shirley!

What do you say we lay some odds on the outcome of LC6?

...if the Allies win, well, you come to a game...

Nevermind, nothing quite so severe, this is a game after all.


Sounds almost interesting except this year they're not keeping score.  The Allies will have to accomplish their objectives while getting trying to win support of the various tribes.  Not so much force on force 24x7 this time where you shoot everyone not dressed like you.  :)  

Good luck trying to 'win' with your ROE.   :P
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Vince on April 16, 2007, 01:46:04 PM
Quote from: "usafcajun"
Good luck trying to 'win' with your ROE.   :P


Just because there's no point system doesn't mean that the outcome of the OP won't be decided. It's going to be decided based on mission success and failures.

Unfortunately, I think you put too much stock in the ROE. As the old saying goes...it's only illegal if you get caught. I'm not putting any sort of stock in the outcome, and without any sort of hubris, I hope you guys can put up a good fight. I've thought since the roster was announced that BoUSA put too much stock in people wanting to be the bad guy; 4:1 is way too high a ratio when you guys don't have noncoms to blend in with. Any time I see somebody in something other than ACU or MARPAT, all I have to do is wait until a) you do something hostile so I can kill you or b) nobody's around so I can kill you.

It worked well at Bulldog because the teams were even; here, I'm not so sure.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: usafcajun on April 16, 2007, 02:31:02 PM
Yeah, it'll definitely be interesting with the team ratios but I still suspect there are some elements that we aren't aware of yet.  You're right about the ROE, it's only effective if followed.  I'll reserve further comments until I get my player pack in a week or so.  :)
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Ganef on April 16, 2007, 04:52:28 PM
This tribesman had a saw.. and remember what happened to him?

(http://www.heise.de/tp/r4/artikel/22/22620/22620_1.jpg)
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: usafcajun on April 16, 2007, 05:53:26 PM
Yeah but he was a perfect example of the 10% rule. :lol:
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Ghostsequel on April 19, 2007, 10:43:52 AM
Nice paint Nosmo.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Kileyhaz on April 19, 2007, 11:59:19 AM
Quote from: "Ghostsequel"
Nice paint Nosmo.

I agree, did you prep the stock in any way or just use a krylon camo over the stock TM stock?  Let me know how it holds on for you, I'd love to make my M14 a tan color but am afriad the paint will smear right off after a game or two.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: nosmo on April 19, 2007, 04:33:06 PM
Thanks Ghostsequel, I was surprised how well it turned out considering it was my first paint job.

Kileyhaz, I didn't prep the stock at all, I just used Khaki krylon paint.  I first started with two layers and then added an additional two a couple weeks later.  Even so, the contact points are obviously going to wear off as you can tell in the picture.  Just make sure you follow the directions EXACTLY on the krylon can.  They're something to the effect of, "paint dries in 15 minutes, able to be handled after 24 hours, apply all additional coats with in 24 hrs or seven days later" If you apply additional coats after 24 hours, but before 7 days the paint will clump or something to that effect.

The paint doesn't spear right off after a game or two though, so I would definitely paint an M14 if you were to get one, it really improves the finish of it in my opinion, and just looks better than the black that Socom 16 comes with.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: babybackribs on May 01, 2007, 10:09:37 PM
pilz, did Ron use a flat clearcoat?  If not, you should put a couple coats on to protect the paint.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: pilz on May 01, 2007, 10:25:56 PM
No I will wait for the paint to cure which won't be for a few weeks but ok. clear is too glossy.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: babybackribs on May 01, 2007, 10:26:49 PM
Quote from: "pilz"
No I will wait for the paint to cure which won't be for a few weeks but ok. clear is too glossy.

Not if you get a flat clearcoat.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Nil8r on May 01, 2007, 11:16:40 PM
There is no reason to use a clearcoat with krylon camo paint. If the paint starts to show wear, which it will in often-handled areas, you just retouch it. It's easy enough to apply, and Pilz knows how to do it. Besides, a pristene paintjob means your gun is more for show than field use.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: babybackribs on May 01, 2007, 11:53:38 PM
Quote from: "Nil8r"
It's easy enough to apply, and Pilz knows how to do it.

Yeah, but he'll screw it up.   ;)
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Nil8r on May 02, 2007, 12:41:32 AM
If he does mess it up, I'll help him fix it, or just make fun of him so much he'll feel obligated to sell me the gun cheap. (then I'll fix it. lol)
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: pilz on May 02, 2007, 06:27:02 AM
Quote from: "Nil8r"
If he does mess it up, I'll help him fix it, or just make fun of him so much he'll feel obligated to sell me the gun cheap. (then I'll fix it. lol)

I don't really think that I can screw it up bad enough to were I want to sell it becuase then I could just paint over it. But I do stupid things alot and that would probaly be one of them, Thank you Ron for painting it though.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Nil8r on May 02, 2007, 11:44:08 AM
That's the point Jon, it's nearly impossible to mess this up. Have fun with it, experiment with new stencils, etc. You're welcome, it was fun.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: babybackribs on May 03, 2007, 11:29:38 PM
Vince, you didn't get the one with FN trademarks?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Vince on May 03, 2007, 11:33:39 PM
Quote from: "babybackribs"
Vince, you didn't get the one with FN trademarks?


No, that wasn't out when I got mine, and I got mine at cost, so, it wasn't worth probably another $200 for something that might get painted over some day.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: pilz on May 17, 2007, 01:00:14 PM
Hey bowtie nice RPK does it have a Drum mag or any internal upgrades? Is that the new Inokatsu RPK kit? That gun is awsome maybe you should give it to me.. :D
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Bow-tie Assasin on May 17, 2007, 02:26:11 PM
Quote from: "pilz"
Hey bowtie nice RPK does it have a Drum mag or any internal upgrades? Is that the new Inokatsu RPK kit? That gun is awsome maybe you should give it to me.. :D


Not yet, No, sort of, Thank you, and no way in hell.

I'll be getting the MAG drum mag for it after LC and it doesn't really need any internal upgrades but I might do something with it down the road. It's not the kit from redwolf but the actuall complete aeg.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: pilz on May 22, 2007, 10:14:09 PM
Nice Shrike hows it working for you?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: babybackribs on May 22, 2007, 10:17:55 PM
Quote from: "pilz"
Nice Shrike hows it working for you?

I dunno.  I haven't shot it yet.  I just finished putting it together.  I did get the box mag working, though.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: pilz on May 22, 2007, 10:18:39 PM
Damn but are both of your guns working now?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: babybackribs on May 22, 2007, 10:28:31 PM
Quote from: "pilz"
Damn but are both of your guns working now?

My Airsoft Surgeon's in pieces.  I took it apart to get the piston out.  Turns out the piston didn't strip, the back just got ripped off.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: pilz on May 22, 2007, 10:35:14 PM
Thats what happened to my deepfire.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Brando on May 22, 2007, 10:57:01 PM
the shrike lives on
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: babybackribs on May 23, 2007, 07:12:34 AM
Quote from: "Brando"
the shrike lives on

Well, did you think I'd throw it away?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: PygmyXile on May 23, 2007, 07:22:13 AM
it is definitley shmexy.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Brando on May 23, 2007, 11:21:37 AM
no its just that since kyle caught it on fire it really hasnt even seen daylight till it found your hands
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Brando on May 23, 2007, 07:50:27 PM
pillz vince just owned ur ass. Vince is that 3 m249s i count? You got issues man
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Ares on May 23, 2007, 08:36:17 PM
vince, i love how the plate on the car has EBR. too funny
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: babybackribs on May 25, 2007, 12:30:02 AM
Brandon-

For some reason, the short front and the big stock just don't seem to work well together.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: extremist on May 25, 2007, 08:36:08 AM
Man alive vince how do u choose which gun to use next!!
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: corporalred on May 28, 2007, 12:25:46 PM
hey brando i love that black SCAR....
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Ares on June 23, 2007, 10:43:00 PM
that revolver in the opus-x box was quite disappointing. i would have liked a box full of opus's more haha
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: pilz on June 24, 2007, 02:28:22 AM
Hey Vince is that a Inokatsu by any chance? If it is did you buy the kit or the complete AEG?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Raith on June 26, 2007, 05:09:49 PM
Pilz, are those replica Troy folding sights?  If so, are they the King Arms ones?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Vince on June 26, 2007, 05:14:00 PM
Yes, and no, I bet you anything they're the Boomer ones from APD.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: XavierMace on June 26, 2007, 05:20:00 PM
I picked up the King Arms set off Redwolf last week.  They are quote nice if that is why you were asking about them.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: pilz on June 26, 2007, 06:51:05 PM
Quote from: "Raith"
Pilz, are those replica Troy folding sights?  If so, are they the King Arms ones?

Yes they are the King Arms ones. They are better than I thought they would be, no wobble at in in them.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Raith on July 01, 2007, 01:22:28 AM
Quote from: "babybackribs"
pilz, get that grease off that body.


Or at least smear it over to around the trigger pins. :P
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: pilz on July 01, 2007, 03:20:34 PM
Quote from: "Raith"
Quote from: "babybackribs"
pilz, get that grease off that body.

Or at least smear it over to around the trigger pins. :P

I couldn't find my rubbing alcohol so I just took the pictures but I put a new pic up with the gun cleaned no grease.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Raith on July 01, 2007, 09:49:54 PM
Quote from: "pilz"
Quote from: "Raith"
Quote from: "babybackribs"
pilz, get that grease off that body.

Or at least smear it over to around the trigger pins. :P
I couldn't find my rubbing alcohol so I just took the pictures but I put a new pic up with the gun cleaned no grease.


I'm just giving you a hard time. :P
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: LaserRacer on July 17, 2007, 04:09:03 PM
I am so happy, I finally finished my M12 AK47!!!

Seriously...The gun started life as a CA XM177 A2.
I added the A2 flash-hider off of my M15A4, a 300MM 6.04 Guarder Tightbore and a G&P Aimpoint replica.

Of course it had to rain today so the indoor pics will have to suffice for today.

The gun is for my girlfriend to use (she wanted something smaller than my full rifle and I wanted to share a common magazine) but I will probably be fielding it occasionally.

One question I had was where on the rail would the aimpoint normally be placed? I think it's about right but I'm not sure.

(The other) One question I have is where I can get a normal sling (I think that is a two point) for the full rifle. I don't want a three point sling, and I don't want one that is stretchy or anything like that. I just want a plain, no padding, no frills shoulder sling.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Ares on July 17, 2007, 04:55:05 PM
clearly.. it's an M12 AK47.

good lookin guns. i like the M733. Whats with the body color though? its a CA right?

the aimpoint is fine. Whatever feels best for you.  i always like mine as far forward as possible.

as for the sling question... i suggest a 3pt. or theres always the option of using a 1pt woven into your rig. Whichever you like best really. It's all about personal preference and comfort.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: sdobbins on July 17, 2007, 05:01:18 PM
Quote from: "Ares"
Whats with the body color though? its a CA right?


CA is right on the body color for their XM177E2 and M16A1 rifles as the early Vietnam rifles had a grayish body with black hand guards.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Ares on July 17, 2007, 05:02:43 PM
oh right. it's got the whole old school thing goin for it. for a second i thought it was a plastic receiver, but then i saw the armalite stamp, i had to ask
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: LaserRacer on July 17, 2007, 05:05:13 PM
Yeah, Its the CA XM 177 E2... As far as the body color, I think CA changed the body color of all of the Vietnam era ArmaLites.

There are all sorts of oddities with the 177... For instance, the inner barrel goes halfway down the flash-hider (Necessitating the new inner barrel for my build) also, Dobbins confirmed that the foregrip is indeed a little bit smaller inside (hence the troubles with the battery) finally, MAG magazines don't feed worth a damn in the thing without taping the back of the magwell to push it forward.

I think I am going to write a review on the gun in a little while seeing as there are none to be found on the internet.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: LaserRacer on July 18, 2007, 03:07:22 PM
airsofting4god...

My two cents on your primary...take off the camo tape, I am guessing you are going for a kind of tactical look, but H&K already did that work for you by designing the gun. Also, that pattern is something that belongs on somebody holding a deer rifle (a Winchester model 94 in .30-30 comes to mind.)

Anyway, just my suggestion.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Ares on July 18, 2007, 03:23:20 PM
i agree. we're not hunting wabbits.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: XavierMace on July 18, 2007, 03:44:37 PM
Gah! My eyes!

If you are going to tape it, at least tape it completely or with something a little more professional look.  It just looks tacky as it is.  I'm with Laser and Ares, take the tape off.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: airsofting4god on July 18, 2007, 04:41:31 PM
Thanks for your advice i think you all are right . thanks again
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: LaserRacer on July 18, 2007, 05:01:53 PM
I have been wanting to paint that rifle for a while now... finally got around to doing it. This is the first time I have painted a gun. Feel free to give me any tips/suggestions.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: airsofting4god on July 18, 2007, 05:06:45 PM
How did you do it, spray paint?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: LaserRacer on July 18, 2007, 05:12:15 PM
Krylon Fusion...Its specifically designed to bond to plastics without primer.

Get the camouflage shades...they are extremely flat.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Native_Airsoft on July 18, 2007, 05:36:28 PM
Quote from: "LaserRacer"
Krylon Fusion...Its specifically designed to bond to plastics without primer.

Get the camouflage shades...they are extremely flat.


Where'd you buy that paint at? Thanks in advance.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: LaserRacer on July 18, 2007, 05:44:17 PM
Wal-Mart... But only one of the two in Prescott carries it.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Kurn on July 18, 2007, 06:39:38 PM
Ace Hardware has it too.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Native_Airsoft on July 18, 2007, 07:23:12 PM
That's what I heard/thought. Thanks.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: XavierMace on July 18, 2007, 07:43:46 PM
Get some of the Rustoleum textured flat enamel as well and use it on the high contact areas.  It feels really nice and doesn't wear as fast.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: LaserRacer on July 18, 2007, 08:27:09 PM
Any specific flat clearcoat you can recommend? I can tell this is going to wear REALLY quick if I don't clearcoat it.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Vince on July 18, 2007, 08:29:23 PM
Quote from: "LaserRacer"
Any specific flat clearcoat you can recommend? I can tell this is going to wear REALLY quick if I don't clearcoat it.


At which point, you do it again.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: LaserRacer on July 18, 2007, 08:34:18 PM
Works for me...it was actually kind of fun. I don't think I did half bad for a first try.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: pilz on July 28, 2007, 08:26:45 PM
Nice m4, why is one m910 darker than the other one?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: LaserRacer on August 03, 2007, 12:28:48 PM
I dunno...I think the HK MP series are guns that look best plain black (seeing as they are mainly an indoor/cqb weapon platform)
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: airsofting4god on August 03, 2007, 06:29:14 PM
Thanks for putting my link in to my picture could not figuer how 2 put the picture into a pic
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: zmoto on August 03, 2007, 08:41:00 PM
nice scar
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: pilz on August 03, 2007, 09:09:05 PM
Farslayer I like the HKp2000, nice paintjob on the mp5 also.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: airsofting4god on August 04, 2007, 08:21:31 AM
i painted the mp5 and the hk is a my gun also
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: pilz on August 08, 2007, 09:23:51 AM
The paintjob on that m700 looks good, but it could use some lighter colored khaki, and then some tan. The digital you have there is a little too dark, and adding some other shades may help.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Kileyhaz on August 08, 2007, 10:01:20 AM
Quote from: "pilz"
The paintjob on that m700 looks good, but it could use some lighter colored khaki, and then some tan. The digital you have there is a little too dark, and adding some other shades may help.


Thanks Pilz, my girlfriend had the brainstorm to try it like that so we gave it a go with the tan and brown.  She also said that it needed to be at least 3 tones after we saw the finished product.  I'll probably leave this one as is for now and if the paint and clear coat hold up on the field, if they do I'll try a MK2 version of it on a surplus M14 stock.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Farslayer on August 10, 2007, 04:21:17 PM
Ribs,

where did you pick that up?  looks like someplace where there are basements....
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: babybackribs on August 10, 2007, 08:03:46 PM
Got it on Arnie's.  The guy lives in Boston.  Also got my spare mag from Redwolf today since they are having a blowout sale.  I didn't know the mags were THAT big.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: pilz on August 10, 2007, 10:50:23 PM
Quote from: "babybackribs"
Got it on Arnie's.  The guy lives in Boston.  Also got my spare mag from Redwolf today since they are having a blowout sale.  I didn't know the mags were THAT big.

Well, it's a .50BMG for a reason isn't it?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: babybackribs on August 10, 2007, 11:43:12 PM
Quote from: "pilz"
Quote from: "babybackribs"
Got it on Arnie's.  The guy lives in Boston.  Also got my spare mag from Redwolf today since they are having a blowout sale.  I didn't know the mags were THAT big.
Well, it's a .50BMG for a reason isn't it?

Yea, but the mag's a two-hander.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Vince on August 10, 2007, 11:45:49 PM
Quote from: "babybackribs"
Quote from: "pilz"
Quote from: "babybackribs"
Got it on Arnie's.  The guy lives in Boston.  Also got my spare mag from Redwolf today since they are having a blowout sale.  I didn't know the mags were THAT big.
Well, it's a .50BMG for a reason isn't it?
Yea, but the mag's a two-hander.


Still not seeing any guns that cost more than my car. Or my house.

That is a nice looking gun, though.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: babybackribs on August 11, 2007, 12:12:35 AM
Still cost more than your girlfriend.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Ghostsequel on August 11, 2007, 12:24:33 AM
Quote from: "babybackribs"
Still cost more than your girlfriend.


 :roll:

Probably the dumbest comeback I've heard in a while.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Vince on August 11, 2007, 01:26:49 AM
Quote from: "babybackribs"
Still cost more than your girlfriend.


A stock CA M4 costs more than my car payments. :d

None of your guns cost more than my house payment. :d
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Vince on August 11, 2007, 01:28:00 AM
Quote from: "babybackribs"
Still cost more than your girlfriend.


Your schtick in your signature's just not very true...you got nice guns, so what? There's people on this board with more expensive/nicer/better guns than you.

The whole 'hehe, I'm gonna put 'I'm an asshole' in my sig and then act like one' is pretty played out too.

Whatever, drive on.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: airsofting4god on August 11, 2007, 11:57:09 AM
babybackribs  nice rifle how many fps
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: pilz on August 11, 2007, 07:30:17 PM
The VFC m82a1 mid-term usualy shoots around 460-500fps with 8mm .34g bb's.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Brando on August 12, 2007, 12:14:02 AM
so where is he going to use it?  that is higher then any field fps rules.  including best of usa correct?  plus i heard the hop up doesnt even work on yours.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: babybackribs on August 12, 2007, 12:37:39 AM
Quote from: "pilz"
The VFC m82a1 mid-term usualy shoots around 460-500fps with 8mm .34g bb's.
It shoots ~370 fps w/ .48g with HFC134 gas.  Plus, I'm getting a custom Escort blowback system and adjustable FPS regulator put in.

Quote from: "Brando"
so where is he going to use it?  that is higher then any field fps rules.  including best of usa correct?  plus i heard the hop up doesnt even work on yours.


Let me guess, pilz told you that?  Guess what, what you hear isn't always true!  And I have yet to hear an fps limit for a sniper rifle using 8mm bb's anywhere in AZ.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Ghostsequel on August 12, 2007, 01:07:27 AM
Good luck finding somewhere to play with it.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Cheeze_IZ_G00d on August 12, 2007, 11:02:19 AM
Quote from: "babybackribs"
Quote from: "pilz"
The VFC m82a1 mid-term usualy shoots around 460-500fps with 8mm .34g bb's.
It shoots ~370 fps w/ .48g with HFC134 gas.  Plus, I'm getting a custom Escort blowback system and adjustable FPS regulator put in.

Quote from: "babybackribs"
Quote from: "Brando"
so where is he going to use it?  that is higher then any field fps rules.  including best of usa correct?  plus i heard the hop up doesnt even work on yours.
Let me guess, pilz told you that?  Guess what, what you hear isn't always true!  And I have yet to hear an fps limit for a sniper rifle using 8mm bb's anywhere in AZ.


So, you think that that entitles you to make it shoot as fast as you want? I can assure you, the 8mm BB will shoot no faster than a 6mm at 500 FPS. (At least at AZ games)
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: babybackribs on August 12, 2007, 11:44:28 AM
No.  Brandon said that it shoots higher than any field FPS limit, and I have never heard any for AZ fields.  And it's WAY under Best of USA events limits.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Nil8r on August 12, 2007, 12:08:56 PM
Here is a quick and dirty FPS conversion:

8mm .48g BB = 370fps = 3.04 joules

Converted to a .20g BB weight, the new readings will be 571.89fps, which far excedes current local (and national BofUSA event) limits.

Regardless of what FPS it's shooting at, I doubt it'll be much of an issue because I don't think we'll see you humping around a 20lb. rifle in the field all day.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: pilz on August 12, 2007, 02:00:19 PM
Quote from: "Nil8r"
Here is a quick and dirty FPS conversion:

8mm .48g BB = 370fps = 3.04 joules

Converted to a .20g BB weight, the new readings will be 571.89fps, which far excedes current local (and national BofUSA event) limits.

Regardless of what FPS it's shooting at, I doubt it'll be much of an issue because I don't think we'll see you humping around a 20lb. rifle in the field all day.

Thats just a little too fast, I don't see any reason to have a airsoft rifle shooting that hot unless you have no feild limit, or you use it for target practice in your backyard. I would carry around a 20lb rifle all day if its all I had, but then again thats me and not everyone would do that.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: babybackribs on August 12, 2007, 03:18:26 PM
Quote from: "Nil8r"
Here is a quick and dirty FPS conversion:

8mm .48g BB = 370fps = 3.04 joules

Converted to a .20g BB weight, the new readings will be 571.89fps, which far excedes current local (and national BofUSA event) limits.

Regardless of what FPS it's shooting at, I doubt it'll be much of an issue because I don't think we'll see you humping around a 20lb. rifle in the field all day.

Quote from: "Best of USA Field Rules"
Using .34g (8mm) BBs: OK < 448 fps Caution 448 - 460 fps NO GO > 460 fps

Quote from: "Redwolf Airsoft"
Power comes in the form of HFC134a gas (good for 290-310fps using 0.34g 8mm BBs


And 2 things:  Of course I won't be slumping it around all day.  It's meant to be in one position, not carried around like an assault rifle.  And you will never see me use it, because I don't play with you guys.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Vince on August 12, 2007, 03:44:40 PM
yawn
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: pilz on August 15, 2007, 10:25:14 PM
Nice PTW Brandon, I like that VLTOR CAS-V it gives it a more solid feel even though that thing is already a rock.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: pilz on August 27, 2007, 05:22:58 PM
Nice Barret, it needs a good scope now. Whens WGC going to ship it?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: babybackribs on August 27, 2007, 06:05:07 PM
I ordered it from UN.  It's a Tasco 6-24x50AOE.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: pilz on August 27, 2007, 08:06:33 PM
Quote from: "babybackribs"
I ordered it from UN.  It's a Tasco 6-24x50AOE.

Not bad, a little power isn't it? You got one of the last one's made its number 965 of 1000 if I am correct.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: babybackribs on August 27, 2007, 09:33:19 PM
Quote from: "pilz"
Quote from: "babybackribs"
I ordered it from UN.  It's a Tasco 6-24x50AOE.
Not bad, a little power isn't it? You got one of the last one's made its number 965 of 1000 if I am correct.

No.  VFC only made 100.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: pilz on August 28, 2007, 03:47:00 AM
Quote from: "babybackribs"
Quote from: "pilz"
Quote from: "babybackribs"
I ordered it from UN.  It's a Tasco 6-24x50AOE.
Not bad, a little power isn't it? You got one of the last one's made its number 965 of 1000 if I am correct.
No.  VFC only made 100.

Thats to bad they don't have unique serial numbers that show what number they were in production.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Speedy on August 29, 2007, 12:41:28 PM
Pilz....
Is that L96 sniper a UTG???
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: pilz on August 29, 2007, 12:43:48 PM
Quote from: "Speedy"
Pilz....
Is that L96 sniper a UTG???

No, It's a Tanaka m700 AICS preban with PCS bolt.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Vince on August 29, 2007, 12:45:45 PM
that's a UTG, stop lying
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: pilz on August 29, 2007, 01:35:39 PM
Quote from: "Vince"
that's a UTG, stop lying

Ok, sorry guys its a UTG Vince wins.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Speedy on August 31, 2007, 12:51:53 PM
Pilz how does it shoot???
Good gun???
I shot one the other day and i liked it so much i thought it was time for me to order one. Think i would be waisting money or no?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: XavierMace on August 31, 2007, 01:00:06 PM
A new one isn't going to shoot near as well as that one.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Speedy on September 01, 2007, 06:32:42 PM
Hmmmm???
What do you mean?
Upgrades?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: XavierMace on September 01, 2007, 06:40:48 PM
It's a pre-ban with a G&G Power Kit and rubbers plus a custom nozzle.  All it really needs is a Dee's to be good to go.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: pilz on September 02, 2007, 08:22:01 AM
Quote from: "Speedy"
Pilz how does it shoot???
Good gun???
I shot one the other day and i liked it so much i thought it was time for me to order one. Think i would be waisting money or no?

It shoots nicely with KSC .30's, .43's don't go as far as the .30's so that is why I don't use them. It gets about the range of a highly upgraded AEG or so which is good. It's quiet and works well. It could use a few upgrades but its getting cold here so I can't use it. Its around 65 or so, and I don't want to mod it for HPA since I don't know how.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Speedy on September 02, 2007, 11:09:51 AM
What did you put in it? How far away can you hit a regular size paper plate.
FPS???
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: pilz on September 04, 2007, 11:12:08 AM
You forgot the m203 on that .50, also that Eo-tech adds the little bit of uniqueness to it if thats even a word.

Wow that thing is bigger than Chloe
(http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b374/babybackribs/M82A1/100_1945.jpg)
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Kilo11 on September 04, 2007, 03:04:25 PM
Quote from: "pilz"
You forgot the m203 on that .50



Pilz your right, i mean whats a .50 without a M203?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: babybackribs on September 04, 2007, 03:16:38 PM
Quote from: "pilz"
You forgot the m203 on that .50, also that Eo-tech adds the little bit of uniqueness to it if thats even a word.
I tried to put it on, but I ran out of tape.

Quote
Wow that thing is bigger than Chloe

That'll never happen.  ;)
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: RockShoxTora on September 12, 2007, 11:33:59 PM
Ribs,
Buying a large gun really doesn't compensate for a small penis.

-Brian
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: seanm028 on September 12, 2007, 11:59:51 PM
Quote from: "RockShoxTora"
Ribs,
Buying a large gun really doesn't compensate for a small penis.

-Brian


... welcome to the forums?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: RockShoxTora on September 13, 2007, 12:46:51 AM
Quote from: "seanm028"
Quote from: "RockShoxTora"
Ribs,
Buying a large gun really doesn't compensate for a small penis.

-Brian

... welcome to the forums?


Thankyou Sean.
I've known of Ribs from being on these forums previously.
I've posted an intro already.

-Brian
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: seanm028 on September 13, 2007, 12:49:40 AM
Quote from: "RockShoxTora"
I've known of Ribs from being on these forums previously.
Okay, got ya

Quote from: "RockShoxTora"
I've posted an intro already.

I read it.  Seriously, welcome.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: babybackribs on September 13, 2007, 09:21:21 PM
Quote from: "RockShoxTora"
Ribs,
Buying a large gun really doesn't compensate for a small penis.

-Brian

I don't give a shit what you think because I don't know you nor will I ever care to meet you.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: XavierMace on September 14, 2007, 11:19:36 AM
Out of curiosity since you tell everybody you will never meet them or care to meet them, why are you on these forums even?  You seem to serve no purpose on here other than demonstrate how spoiled you are.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Vince on September 14, 2007, 12:11:18 PM
No, dude.

He pays for this stuff with his own money.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Kilo11 on September 14, 2007, 12:37:58 PM
Quote from: "Vince"
No, dude.

He pays for this stuff with his own money.


Selling crack, can help you with that.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Cheeze_IZ_G00d on September 15, 2007, 06:51:09 AM
Quote from: "Kilo11"
Quote from: "Vince"
No, dude.

He pays for this stuff with his own money.

Selling crack, can help you with that.


Actually, according to Steven Levitt in Freakonomics, the average, street-level crack dealer makes about $3.50/hour, and has a 7x more likely chance of dying on the job than the average worker. Owning a brothel, there is a money maker.

Back on topic, Tora, why you hatin? Do you even know the kid? Next time you have something like that to say, keep it to PM.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: deathbydanish on September 15, 2007, 01:22:51 PM
Quote from: "Vince"
No, dude.

He pays for this stuff with his own money.


That just cracks me up everytime he says that, lets see him produce a W2 first.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: RockShoxTora on September 16, 2007, 04:22:25 PM
Quote from: "Cheeze_IZ_G00d"
Back on topic, Tora, why you hatin? Do you even know the kid? Next time you have something like that to say, keep it to PM.


I'm not hatin' for no good reason.
I just find it pretty crazy that a kid his age is making that much money.
I'm not saying I'm much older nor better in any way.
I just find it pretty mind boggling and rather braggart.

Mabye I should stop being a pessimist.
Mabye he is paying with his own money.
But either way you look at it, once his parents give him the money, technically, it is his own money.

I don't mean to come off as an asshole.
I really just felt like throwing in my two cents :)

-Brian
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: noVtecHERE on September 17, 2007, 02:36:19 PM
Quote from: "babybackribs"
Quote from: "RockShoxTora"
Ribs,
Buying a large gun really doesn't compensate for a small penis.

-Brian
I don't give a s*** what you think because I don't know you nor will I ever care to meet you.



man ur the coolest person i have ever seen... you know how to talk smack on the web and sit behind ur keyboard and smash on people.... ur soo cool ur gun cost more than anything i have ever owned, man ur the coolest er cool person i have ever seen on the interwebz... your so cool... if i was you i would sit on a butcher knife, rip out my eyes, shove them down my peehole, rip my nose off and sniff my own ass b4 setting fire to my bed which i have already covered in gasoline since now i cannot see and cry while pinching my nipples off and shoving them into my mouth while i slowly bake to a crisp dark color before taking my last breath... and fucking die.... or just jump off of a cliff.... people like you should fuck off :)





I found this on another forum but i thought it appropriately went here...^^^
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Ares on September 17, 2007, 02:49:27 PM
:shock: yyyyeah... how forums go astray, 101
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: noVtecHERE on September 17, 2007, 05:15:28 PM
i saw that on a gaming forum that came up when i was looking for 44 minutes: north hollywood shootout for download...
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: chris on September 17, 2007, 05:58:58 PM
Did you find it BTW, i saw that show and it was really interesting.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: mini-support on September 17, 2007, 06:06:41 PM
Um, I think I have the single most expensive airsoft weapon on this forum. :roll:
It doesnt matter how much you spent on any airsoft gun anyways. In the end, no matter what, its still just a damn toy. Find something else more intelligent to argue about children.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: deathbydanish on September 18, 2007, 07:30:58 PM
Quote from: "mini-support"
Um, I think I have the single most expensive airsoft weapon on this forum. :roll:
It doesnt matter how much you spent on any airsoft gun anyways. In the end, no matter what, its still just a damn toy. Find something else more intelligent to argue about children.


IIRC it involved getting a second mortgage (original weapon + associated external parts). Even richie rich here can't compete with that
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: TheStenGun on September 19, 2007, 06:15:51 PM
The wood looks wonderful on the G3, very classy. Is it just converted real steel parts?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Brando on September 19, 2007, 08:09:27 PM
Creeping Death its good to see another systema user on here. What rifles do you have?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Morgann0 on September 19, 2007, 10:00:11 PM
I'm with Sten on that one.  The wood looks incredible.  Very freedom fighter.  See? I said freedom fighter instead of terrorist, because as soon as you pick up a rifle like that, your cause is instantly noble.  Unless you are an Islamic Extremist or advocate illegal immigration.  Seriously though, great stuff.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Pryde on September 20, 2007, 06:14:19 AM
Quote from: "TheStenGun"
The wood looks wonderful on the G3, very classy. Is it just converted real steel parts?


Yup, it's a real steel wood set...the work was actually really easy to do...did it all in under a day (filling a spot with JB Weld and waiting for it to cure took the most time)
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Creeping Death on September 20, 2007, 09:00:27 AM
Quote from: "Brando"
Creeping Death its good to see another systema user on here. What rifles do you have?


the only PTW I have is a bone stock M4-A1 MAX with a M130 cylinder and 9.6v battery.
I also got the new mil-spec buttstock plate in yesterday with is a lot better than the standard one. they even made it matte colored to match the stock (original one is kinda shiny).
My only plans for it in the future are figuring out a cool sling to get for it... its got that lower front sling mount which rules out a lot of sweet 3-points (unless you get a Vickers foregrip mount) so I'm not sure what to do.
with my red M150 cyclinder it shoots so damn far I might get some kind of scope too (not that anyone will ever let me use that cylinder in a game).
I just saw the photo thread and your PTW is pretty sick.
is it a MAX or Gen III? lemme know too if you have any extra parts you wouldn't mind parting with.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: RockShoxTora on September 22, 2007, 02:43:39 PM
AirsoftBen, I absolutly love the lower reciever!
By any chance, is that custom work or did you purchase it?

-Brian
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Vince on September 22, 2007, 02:51:17 PM
It's the G&P Zombie Killer body.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: AirsoftBen on September 22, 2007, 05:41:49 PM
What Vince said. I was going to just replace the old metal body, but the G&P one wouldn't thread with the RIS I had, so I had to get a G&P free floating RIS, and that forced me to get a new Front site. Funny how $135 turns into $255 really quick.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Cheeze_IZ_G00d on September 22, 2007, 08:48:34 PM
Quote from: "Creeping Death"
Quote from: "Brando"
Creeping Death its good to see another systema user on here. What rifles do you have?

the only PTW I have is a bone stock M4-A1 MAX with a M130 cylinder and 9.6v battery.
I also got the new mil-spec buttstock plate in yesterday with is a lot better than the standard one. they even made it matte colored to match the stock (original one is kinda shiny).
My only plans for it in the future are figuring out a cool sling to get for it... its got that lower front sling mount which rules out a lot of sweet 3-points (unless you get a Vickers foregrip mount) so I'm not sure what to do.
with my red M150 cyclinder it shoots so damn far I might get some kind of scope too (not that anyone will ever let me use that cylinder in a game).
I just saw the photo thread and your PTW is pretty sick.
is it a MAX or Gen III? lemme know too if you have any extra parts you wouldn't mind parting with.


Are the PTW's all they are cracked up to be? I have long considered liquidating my current arsenal to get one. However, the lack of local support, and difficulty and expense of parts and accessories have always deterred me. I know they shoot well, and perform well, but where would you have them serviced if they were to break down?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Creeping Death on September 23, 2007, 02:55:40 PM
Quote from: "Cheeze_IZ_G00d"
Quote from: "Creeping Death"
Quote from: "Brando"
Creeping Death its good to see another systema user on here. What rifles do you have?

the only PTW I have is a bone stock M4-A1 MAX with a M130 cylinder and 9.6v battery.
I also got the new mil-spec buttstock plate in yesterday with is a lot better than the standard one. they even made it matte colored to match the stock (original one is kinda shiny).
My only plans for it in the future are figuring out a cool sling to get for it... its got that lower front sling mount which rules out a lot of sweet 3-points (unless you get a Vickers foregrip mount) so I'm not sure what to do.
with my red M150 cyclinder it shoots so damn far I might get some kind of scope too (not that anyone will ever let me use that cylinder in a game).
I just saw the photo thread and your PTW is pretty sick.
is it a MAX or Gen III? lemme know too if you have any extra parts you wouldn't mind parting with.

Are the PTW's all they are cracked up to be? I have long considered liquidating my current arsenal to get one. However, the lack of local support, and difficulty and expense of parts and accessories have always deterred me. I know they shoot well, and perform well, but where would you have them serviced if they were to break down?


they are all they're cracked up to be. the barrel, sights, switches, pins are all steel and the foregrip, pistol grip and stock is a fiber/plastic mix and is a lot harder than the plastic they use on AEG's. you can also switch from shooting 350fps to 550fps in 15 seconds by changing out the cylinders. mags are real M16 mag shells just gutted out and replaced with airsoft internals. they don't dry fire either and a switch inside them turns the motor off when the mag is empty, just like a real gun.
they're also extremely reliable and are basically "milspec" because they're designed to be training weapons for military and law enforcement. there really isn't much you need to buy for them except real steel accessories if you want them. get an extra cylinder and battery and change the o-rings in the cylinders every once in awhile and thats it.
not like a Marui or a CA that you're constantly tinkering with and wanting to get better internals, batteries, tightbore, motors, metal body kit etc.
repairs are handled through distributors and usually just get sent back to Systema Japan for serious repairs. small parts can be ordered through the same distributors. www.z-shot.com (http://www.z-shot.com) is a good source for parts.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: nosmo on September 23, 2007, 03:17:54 PM
Cool gun Airsoft Ben, which squad are you in for BD2?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: AirsoftBen on September 23, 2007, 03:50:31 PM
1st Squad Marines, was in 2nd but since there are other guys from Arizona in 1st Squad they let me move.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: nosmo on September 23, 2007, 03:51:57 PM
Oh cool, nevermind, I'm in 1st rangers.

see ya there!
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Brando on September 23, 2007, 04:14:56 PM
I am very happy with my ptw.  I have owned lots of aegs and none have compared to the performance of the PTW. I like the changing of cylinders so I can change from shooting 350 with .20s to 375 with .25s in about 10 seconds. With an m4 length barrel and .20s it reaches out to people at 200 feet with ease.  There design of the batteries for the stock is similar to that of g&p. The battery is only in 2 parts with a thick metal rod holding it in place so all you do is drop it in and connect it. No wires to mess with.  Plus a distributor in Europe ran a ptw with an m150 and a 12v for over 200,000 bbs without a problem.  I don’t know of a normal aeg that has done that.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Kilo11 on September 23, 2007, 04:19:13 PM
The only think that i dont like about the PTW is that it costs like 250.00 bucks for 5 mags for it, saying that just hurts let alone buying them.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Creeping Death on September 23, 2007, 05:01:50 PM
Quote from: "Kilo11"
The only think that i dont like about the PTW is that it costs like 250.00 bucks for 5 mags for it, saying that just hurts let alone buying them.


its a box of 6 mags for $250.
or you can buy them seperately for $50 each.
besides actually buying the gun, mags are really the only other you'll ever have to buy for it unless you want different cylinders and batteries.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: chris on October 08, 2007, 10:59:50 PM
...why pilz, why...

HEHE its always kool to see what you have new, nice gun. whats it weigh in at?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Kilo11 on October 09, 2007, 04:56:17 PM
Pilz, Sweet SAW, whats the FPS Like with all of those goodies in it?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: pilz on October 09, 2007, 07:16:38 PM
Quote from: "Kilo11"
Pilz, Sweet SAW, whats the FPS Like with all of those goodies in it?

It's around 370 with .20's, but I plan to get it right on the limit of 400 with .20's or 375 with .25's. Its a really nice gun and works flawlessly.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: XavierMace on October 27, 2007, 08:35:58 PM
Quote from: "Pheonix 797"
Very nice look, custom-made can?


No, it's a KM 250mm from Poweredge.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: IcePlatinumSky on November 12, 2007, 08:44:50 PM
Dude the G&P stuby killer looks realy cool. But, dont you think you put way to much money into it for such a short range gun? Then again to each his own, and if in the right CQB environment I guess it would kick ass. With all the high speed parts in it how does it perform? Is it a bb hose or what?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: TheStenGun on November 12, 2007, 09:36:30 PM
The Lipo in the stock tube is a nice touch.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: deathbydanish on November 12, 2007, 11:01:39 PM
Raith, could you humor us and show us a pic from your EOCOG?  :lol:
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: babybackribs on November 12, 2007, 11:20:42 PM
Quote from: "IcePlatinumSky"
Dude the G&P stuby killer looks realy cool. But, dont you think you put way to much money into it for such a short range gun? Then again to each his own, and if in the right CQB environment I guess it would kick ass. With all the high speed parts in it how does it perform? Is it a bb hose or what?

It actually has pretty good range since I tweeked the hopup, but nowhere near my Shrike.  It is also pretty reliable since I already knew how to work on an MTHaynes gearbox so I don't expect any of the parts to break anytime soon.  Once I put a MOSFET and a weaker spring in it, it will be somewhere around 36 rps, since it's at about 34 rps now.  My goal was to make a BB pisser, no matter how impractical, and I think I've achieved my goal.  :D
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Raith on November 13, 2007, 12:28:54 AM
Quote from: "deathbydanish"
Raith, could you humor us and show us a pic from your EOCOG?  :lol:


I have neither EOTech nor ACOG with which to do so.  I think I still have nearly nothing in the photos that I've put up in the past.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: pilz on November 15, 2007, 08:08:24 PM
So, have you put the bb pisser to the test yet? I think somthing like that would be good for a mount envirement, or a backup for indoors.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: deathbydanish on November 15, 2007, 08:49:09 PM
Quote from: "Raith"
Quote from: "deathbydanish"
Raith, could you humor us and show us a pic from your EOCOG?  :lol:

I have neither EOTech nor ACOG with which to do so.  I think I still have nearly nothing in the photos that I've put up in the past.


Aw shucks  :(

Was it at all practical to use or was that really just for fun  :P
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Raith on November 15, 2007, 10:56:20 PM
Quote from: "deathbydanish"
Quote from: "Raith"
Quote from: "deathbydanish"
Raith, could you humor us and show us a pic from your EOCOG?  :lol:

I have neither EOTech nor ACOG with which to do so.  I think I still have nearly nothing in the photos that I've put up in the past.

Aw shucks  :(

Was it at all practical to use or was that really just for fun  :P


It was put that way to take that photo. :P
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Native_Airsoft on November 28, 2007, 07:49:00 PM
Nice to see Echo1 branching out, even to the older players.

So SACR, the G36C takes good to those upgrades? I heard that was one of Echo1's worst guns to upgrade, but from you, it sounds amazing. 350FPS, really?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: SARC on November 28, 2007, 08:25:53 PM
Quote
Nice to see Echo1 branching out, even to the older players.

So SACR, the G36C takes good to those upgrades? I heard that was one of Echo1's worst guns to upgrade, but from you, it sounds amazing. 350FPS, really?


It took the upgrades well.  I will say that you should have an experienced person work on it.  I would not do it on my own. I had Ron down at Gearbox airsoft in Tempe, AZ do the work for me, (no I don't work there I am a customer) he's really good but still got frustrated a couple of times getting everything to fit.  Its really tight.  As for function once we got everything together it was awesome.  It cronographed consistently and when I got it home I was consistently hitting a CD from across my yard ( about 120feet) in semi it did not miss and in full hit mostly..

All in all I am very happy with it..
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Farslayer on November 28, 2007, 10:05:21 PM
Native,

I have a friend that wants to buy an echo dmr.  how is it over all?

oh, turn your flag around.  stars always in the upper left.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Native_Airsoft on November 29, 2007, 07:00:10 AM
Quote from: "Farslayer"
Native,

I have a friend that wants to buy an echo dmr.  how is it over all?

I take it your friend wants to use it as a DMR? Well, there's some trouble. The gun shoot very well with FPS, and range. about 360-370 FPS out of the box, and 150-175ft range. But, the accuracy can't save it's life. If he just puts in a TB, and uses .23s or .25s it's amazing. The RIS on is very well built and study, way worth the extra $30. I use mine with .23s and a box mag, and I have my self a support gun. Over all, I love it, and it great.


Quote from: "Farslayer"
oh, turn your flag around.  stars always in the upper left.


Yea, I know.. I saw that after I took the pic.  :roll:
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Farslayer on November 29, 2007, 07:41:03 AM
Thanks.  I'll give him a head's up.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Uchiha Itachi on November 29, 2007, 08:46:34 PM
Quote from: "Farslayer"
Thanks.  I'll give him a head's up.


If it will be his only AEG I suggest not unless you plan on giving it a MB. The problem with this gun is that the entire front end is metal while the entire back end is plastic. I got the JG version and noticed a 1cm gap between the receivers being caused by the weight of the front end. I had to take one of the rail covers that come with it and put it half/half on the RIS and Body which helps take the weight off the tabs. The RIS unit is kinda shoddy and sometimes grips won't fit since the rails are made iffy. My RIS grip fit one way but when I tried to move the cover it was jammed and the grip had to be hammered on. In addition I had to dismantle most of the gun and reassemble it due to shoddy construction, JG version that is.

FPS is what Native said. Also the RIS unit is a 2 piece with a tri on top and a single on bottom. They are held in place by the Delta which is spring loaded and pins it to the front sight. Bad thing is it will move even with everything tightened down and the barrel will wobble slightly(not enough to be a concern) due to the weight at the front. My above fix removes nearly all of this though.

So its a good gun but for an only AEG I suggest against it. Out of all my clones it concerns me the most.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Native_Airsoft on December 10, 2007, 06:42:21 AM
Hey usafcajun, what brand is that M14?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: usafcajun on December 10, 2007, 02:07:16 PM
It's the Echo-1 M14.  All metal and weighs almost 14lbs.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Native_Airsoft on December 10, 2007, 04:13:50 PM
Quote from: "usafcajun"
It's the Echo-1 M14.  All metal and weighs almost 14lbs.


Echo 1? Can I get another amen?  ;)

Is it really that heavy? I always hear it is.

EDIT: I'd like to add a question. What's the FPS, RoF, and over all way it shoots? Any good?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Farslayer on December 10, 2007, 07:46:15 PM
Quote from: "usafcajun"
It's the Echo-1 M14.  All metal and weighs almost 14lbs.
I was able to handle it at the game.  heavier than I thought.  I was amazed how accurate it was stock.  It also looks really cool.  just paint it.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Vince on December 10, 2007, 09:05:22 PM
RAITH

THAT IS THE WRONG MAGAZINE
[/color][/b]
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Raith on December 10, 2007, 09:52:09 PM
Quote from: "Vince"
RAITH

THAT IS THE WRONG MAGAZINE
[/color][/b]


ETADIK. :P
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: usafcajun on December 10, 2007, 10:55:43 PM
Quote from: "Native_Airsoft"
Quote from: "usafcajun"
It's the Echo-1 M14.  All metal and weighs almost 14lbs.

Echo 1? Can I get another amen?  ;)

Is it really that heavy? I always hear it is.

EDIT: I'd like to add a question. What's the FPS, RoF, and over all way it shoots? Any good?


It's about 13.5lbs in weight.  Chrono'd at 355fps with .25g Killer Beez bbs stock.  Very accurate and nice long range.  I fired it mostly on semi though.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: JeepDropOff on December 11, 2007, 01:28:17 AM
i have a machine gun
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: XavierMace on December 11, 2007, 09:35:53 AM
^^

Congratulations...  :roll:

Cajun, any chance of a side by side comparison with the existing EBR's out there?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: AirsoftBen on December 11, 2007, 09:44:34 PM
Are those Ak74's both Boyi/Kalash? and if so do you have them in at Gearbox?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Raith on December 11, 2007, 09:54:53 PM
Quote from: "AirsoftBen"
Are those Ak74's both Boyi/Kalash?

Yep.

Quote
and if so do you have them in at Gearbox?


Not yet, but soon.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: AirsoftBen on December 11, 2007, 10:44:03 PM
They look pretty good. I am looking for a good backup to my Type 56 and can also be used with a Russian impression. What is the quality of the wood like?

Also how is the Mag Catch on it? I have heard that it doesn't fit other mags well and you have to file it down.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Raith on December 11, 2007, 11:37:28 PM
Quote from: "AirsoftBen"
What is the quality of the wood like?

I really don't have any frame of reference to compare.  These are the first wood AKs I've ever owned.  I have no problems with it.

Quote
Also how is the Mag Catch on it? I have heard that it doesn't fit other mags well and you have to file it down.


The 74U fits everything I've put into it except a CA 74 hicap.  The longer 74 can fit the same, but I will probably file the catch down some as it occasionally hangs up.

The TM clone 7.62 mags that I have go in both guns great, but I'm not sure I can bring myself to use them in these. :P
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: JoJockAmo on December 12, 2007, 08:20:11 AM
Quote from: "Raith"

The TM clone 7.62 mags that I have go in both guns great, but I'm not sure I can bring myself to use them in these. :P


Just call it an AKS-74S,and use the 7.62 mags.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Raith on December 12, 2007, 10:44:15 AM
Quote from: "JoJockAmo"
Just call it an AKS-74S,and use the 7.62 mags.


Thats true.  I have to stop looking at just Soviet stuff.

I'm trying to find an AKS-74 7.62 variant.  Looks like an AK-103 is kinda that way.

The 7.62 mags look cooler, work better, are cheaper, and more importantly, I already have a lot of them.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: bopper9052 on December 16, 2007, 09:04:39 PM
usafcajun, that paint job is sick. Just wondering, how is that M14 treating you? Im looking into buying one from APD. Would you recomend it?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: usafcajun on December 16, 2007, 10:05:11 PM
Quote from: "bopper9052"
usafcajun, that paint job is sick. Just wondering, how is that M14 treating you? Im looking into buying one from APD. Would you recomend it?


I've only used it in one skirmish so far.....but.....it worked flawlessly and managed some decently long shots.  355 fps with .25g bbs right out the box.  Heavier than your average AEG also.  So far I'd recommend it with no reservations.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: devildog16 on December 16, 2007, 10:47:49 PM
usmcpog, I'm liking the launcher....and the stair effect, nice.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Raith on December 16, 2007, 11:15:35 PM
Nice paint job.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Sergeant First Class Keenan on December 16, 2007, 11:29:47 PM
nice stuff.....
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: XavierMace on January 01, 2008, 02:11:37 AM
Beanns2,

Nice, where did you pick it up?  Personally I have been holding out for the -H, but not sure how much longer I can do so.  Any chance of a review once you skirm with it?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: beanns2 on January 01, 2008, 10:49:15 AM
I got it through UNcompany. With the 8% discount from the holidays. As for the review ya I will come up with a lil quick and dirty review on the gun.

I can say already there hop-up is AWESOME. I did crono it yesterday and was at 320 +/- about 5 with .25g Killer Bees.

I was stupid and partially broke the bolt catch on it but it still works. The only problem I ran into at first is the battery packs I own have plastic caps on the end and they make it to thick to fit into the stock.

Besides the battery and my stupidity its a very solid gun. Pretty good sound, and only about 12.5 lbs fully loaded up.

As a side note I think that Star might make it so one can buy the lower receiver, barrel for the Scar-H seperately and than just convert over to that, but dont take my word for it.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: PeyotZET on January 02, 2008, 02:27:45 PM
@Raith:
If an AK is not worn and battle-scarred then its owner should be ashamed!

@usafcajun:
Great paint job. Awesome detailing with the AMSOG logo--it really stands out and overall your gun looks very impressive.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Raith on January 02, 2008, 03:20:58 PM
Quote from: "PeyotZET"
@Raith:
If an AK is not worn and battle-scarred then its owner should be ashamed!


I just got em!
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: -MAD- SARGE on January 02, 2008, 05:52:48 PM
Quote from: "Raith"
Quote from: "PeyotZET"
@Raith:
If an AK is not worn and battle-scarred then its owner should be ashamed!

I just got em!


And he just joined yesterday.....
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: AirsoftBen on January 02, 2008, 06:22:08 PM
Quote
Raith wrote:

I just got em!


Everyone knows that the first thing you do when you get a new AK is to take it outside and roll around in the dirt with it.  [-X

end sarcasm
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Pheonix 797 on January 02, 2008, 11:17:43 PM
What Ryan said
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Raith on January 05, 2008, 12:25:39 AM
Quote from: "AirsoftBen"
Quote
Raith wrote:

I just got em!

Everyone knows that the first thing you do when you get a new AK is to take it outside and roll around in the dirt with it.  [-X

end sarcasm


They'll get broken in, I'm sure.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: morugatu on January 07, 2008, 03:50:13 PM
Dang Uchiha Itachi, nice work on that CA36!  I don't even recognize it anymore. :shock:
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Uchiha Itachi on January 07, 2008, 07:25:56 PM
Bondo does wonders. The grip nub is slightly to big since I just took a used a mold with the mesh on my bros G36c. So it sits on/in the grip. You can't even see the rear crack due to bondo and super glue nor most of the scratches.

The stock color just doesn't look like as good as Ultra Flat.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: morugatu on January 08, 2008, 04:50:54 PM
Yes, that ultra flat certainly looks much more appealing to the eye. ;)

EDIT: That's a beautiful SCAR Altered_Soul!  :shock:   Does it include trademarks or is that writting just VFC's information?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: PeyotZET on January 10, 2008, 05:28:12 PM
@Altered Soul:

Your "G36c" is very sexy, as is your baby hi-capa. However I find SCAR-Ls to be as appealing as Jabba the Hutt.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Altered_Soul on January 11, 2008, 08:59:34 AM
Quote from: "morugatu"
Yes, that ultra flat certainly looks much more appealing to the eye. ;)

EDIT: That's a beautiful SCAR Altered_Soul!  :shock:   Does it include trademarks or is that writting just VFC's information?


The trades are the US VFC import version unforunately, its missing the top line of FN maker mark, but thats it.  Everything else is there.  I didn't feel like paying +$50 and overseas shipping for a 20 character line of whiteout when these trades look good enough.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Altered_Soul on January 14, 2008, 09:51:18 AM
@ JoJockAmo

Holy crap thats an assload of airsoft.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: usafcajun on January 22, 2008, 08:21:57 AM
Vince,

That the Echo-1 EBR?  Have you chrono'd it yet?  Nice paintjob.  I'd like to see if they chrono consistent between guns.  Mine was 393fps/.20g, 353fps/.25g Killerbeez.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: morugatu on January 22, 2008, 04:35:09 PM
Hey Vince, I love the pattern you created with that paintjob!  Mind sharing how you made it? :D
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Vince on January 22, 2008, 04:41:59 PM
Quote from: "usafcajun"
Vince,

That the Echo-1 EBR?  Have you chrono'd it yet?  Nice paintjob.  I'd like to see if they chrono consistent between guns.  Mine was 393fps/.20g, 353fps/.25g Killerbeez.


No, it's a G&P Mk14 built on a TM M14 -- I have had it for like a year +.

morugatu -- a very thin brush and a very patient hand.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Airsofter1 on January 23, 2008, 01:27:47 AM
Quote from: "Vince"
Quote from: "usafcajun"

morugatu -- a very thin brush and a very patient hand.


He hired an asian to do it.  Because they are shorter they can get closer to the work more easily and therefore do such a meticulous and daunting job so well.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: morugatu on January 23, 2008, 05:27:33 PM
Under-paying my asian friends to do my piantjobs for me....sounds like the 'American' thing to do.  Now where did I put that lead paint...
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: usafcajun on January 23, 2008, 06:07:17 PM
Quote from: "morugatu"
Under-paying my asian friends to do my piantjobs for me....sounds like the 'American' thing to do.  Now where did I put that lead paint...


The lead-based paint was last seen in the asbestos lined sweat shop.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: babybackribs on January 25, 2008, 12:30:44 AM
Quote from: "Airsofter1"
Quote from: "Vince"
Quote from: "usafcajun"

morugatu -- a very thin brush and a very patient hand.

He hired an asian to do it.  Because they are shorter they can get closer to the work more easily and therefore do such a meticulous and daunting job so well.

You could also just wrap the gun in netting and paint it.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Altered_Soul on February 26, 2008, 08:43:08 AM
DAMN thats a nice AG36 you got going there Rob.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Uchiha Itachi on February 26, 2008, 10:49:47 AM
The STAR optics are awesome. The only con is with the 3.5x since you must  be really close to use it and it was at a 30degree angle off center. I fixed it but couldn't put the spring back in since it seemed to be too big.

I replicated a Bundeswehr grenadier G36. The only con is that I don't have a shell yet....
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: azsarge on March 13, 2008, 11:28:32 PM
Matt, those are indeed incorrect links for that gun.

Let me see what I can do.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: brandon01 on March 18, 2008, 04:19:51 PM
my favorites are
Paul D Wog'sm4!!!!!!!!!
and Ganef Ak47!!!!!!!!!
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: deathbydanish on March 19, 2008, 07:53:24 AM
Nice 240 Raith!

How's the weight distribution? Is it fairly balanced or will it be front or back heavy?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Ranger_Robby on March 20, 2008, 11:38:24 PM
haha Vince, it's nice to see you still take pics of your guns in the bathroom!
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Raith on March 21, 2008, 02:14:39 AM
Quote from: "deathbydanish"
Nice 240 Raith!

How's the weight distribution? Is it fairly balanced or will it be front or back heavy?


Front to back its okay.  Loaded, its a bit left heavy.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Corporal209 on March 25, 2008, 10:12:10 PM
Dang Vince! TALK ABOUT SEXY! God that gun was beautiful!
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Farslayer on March 25, 2008, 11:18:09 PM
Vince,

how did you mod that echo into a gasser?

you do the work?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: BATMAN on March 26, 2008, 12:00:36 AM
Very funny Vince.  I laughed pretty hard. :)
-BATMAN
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: KOBO on March 26, 2008, 09:26:51 AM
I never wanted an "Echo1" so much in my life...

Vince you need to bring that to the game, I gots to see!
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Corporal209 on April 16, 2008, 06:23:42 PM
Nuclear Rain, i love the Deagle : D
Very nice guns
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: NuclearRain2012 on April 16, 2008, 08:57:22 PM
Quote from: "Corporal209"
Nuclear Rain, i love the Deagle : D
Very nice guns
That DEagle is over 5 years old and is still kicking hard I was skeet shooting with it but used cds and it spilt one in two
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Corporal209 on April 16, 2008, 09:16:25 PM
Nice! FPS?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Altered_Soul on April 17, 2008, 09:09:32 AM
God I hate when people call the DEagles.

Either way, I like the MP5, looks almost brand new.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: deathbydanish on April 17, 2008, 01:53:32 PM
Raith: Are you kidding me? That's the most beautiful picture I've seen.

You're making me want one now more than ever.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: azsarge on April 17, 2008, 06:12:42 PM
Matt, that looks great!

Much nicer with the heat shield and rail.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Raith on April 17, 2008, 09:20:48 PM
I wasn't going to get them initially, but I too think it does look better with the heat shield and rail.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Airsofter1 on April 17, 2008, 09:21:19 PM
Quote from: "deathbydanish"
Raith: Are you kidding me? That's the most beautiful picture I've seen.

You're making me want one now more than ever.


If you get one you better be prepared to haul it around dismounted all day.  No free rides for you little drummer boy.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: babybackribs on April 19, 2008, 11:49:51 PM
Raith, love the gun.  I personally think it would look better with an Elcan and a D-LAP.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: deathbydanish on April 20, 2008, 11:01:55 AM
Quote from: "Airsofter1"
Quote from: "deathbydanish"
Raith: Are you kidding me? That's the most beautiful picture I've seen.

You're making me want one now more than ever.

If you get one you better be prepared to haul it around dismounted all day.  No free rides for you little drummer boy.


What doesn't kill me only makes me stronger!

Seriously though I just need to get in shape then stay in shape.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Pheonix 797 on April 20, 2008, 04:00:18 PM
Want a good start? Start cooking for yourself and walk/run/bike to work. Saves gas and you get to look retarded!

Actually I like the Eotech better it being an airsoft gun and all. Elcan for something that doesn't shoot over 400 ft?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: deathbydanish on April 20, 2008, 04:21:56 PM
Quote from: "Pheonix 797"
Want a good start? Start cooking for yourself and walk/run/bike to work. Saves gas and you get to look retarded!

Actually I like the Eotech better it being an airsoft gun and all. Elcan for something that doesn't shoot over 400 ft?


I used to bike everywhere until someone stole my bike. It seems that I live in the center of bike thief territory. I was definitely in better shape when I was biking everywhere I needed to go to.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Airsofter1 on April 20, 2008, 07:59:48 PM
Hey riath!!!!  I got the same flashlight!!!!!!!1
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Pheonix 797 on April 20, 2008, 09:59:25 PM
Recoil you've got nice taste dude. Now dissasemble the major parts and roll them in the dirt of your back yard ;-p

Mikey is obviously compensating. Such a big light on such a little gun? Tisk tisk!
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: RecoilEF on April 20, 2008, 11:01:57 PM
Quote
Recoil you've got nice taste dude. Now dissasemble the major parts and roll them in the dirt of your back yard ;-p


Hah! Thanks, much appreciated  :D  ! About rolling my rifle in dirt though, i dont think i could bring myself to do that, they are my babies  :oops:
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: babybackribs on April 30, 2008, 12:21:22 AM
Quote from: "Farslayer"
Vince,

how did you mod that echo into a gasser?

you do the work?

It's an Escort 416.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Altered_Soul on May 05, 2008, 10:35:06 AM
Quote from: "Uchiha Itachi"
The last modification before I start my JG G36 projects. I guess its a bastardized G36.

Madbull 6.03 650mm
Madbull Blue 60 degree bucking
M110
Around 380fps +-5

It has crazy range and accuracy. I got sent the wrong silencer but the K front and hinder will be replaced, they just cover the IB right now. For some reason it looks bent, I checked it with a level and its perfectly straight.

(http://i8.photobucket.com/albums/a12/Soujiro_/P1010007-1.jpg)


Looks great man.  What happened with the AG36?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Uchiha Itachi on May 05, 2008, 11:12:20 AM
I took it off. Its been K modded so the barrel moves around to much. It has to have a K length barrel since the gap is to big. I didn't notice and bent my last TB. I'm just going to buy a few JGs and turn them into the various G36 models(its cheaper by about $100 each gun) fully upgraded.

I saw yours and these are the issues you need to know.

1) Both selectors will fall off. I super glued mine down since I had no choice. The hex screws will eventually dig too far in and wobble off.

2) You have to use an external battery pack or sticks. Even after modifying mine minis still don't fit right. They get jammed and take to much time to fit. I just use a pistol mag/battery bag.

3) Nerf vortexes are kind of a pain to launch with it. My stingers slightly comeback and hit the release which opens the launcher. If this happens it will go a whole 5 feet. The only way to stop that is to fire it like an RPG holding it closed with the left. It'll launch one with stingers around 140+ feet when fired correctly. The hotter it gets the further they go.

4) It also scratches very easily.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Altered_Soul on May 05, 2008, 12:05:40 PM
Thanks for the hints.  Luckily thats not my "main" G36, that thing was recently upgraded and will always be my first choice to bring in unless the SCAR handles better.

This is more of a project G36 to play around with, and it satisfied my sudden desire for a grenade launcher I will use approxiamately, never.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Kingarmssniper on May 11, 2008, 10:36:08 PM
I saw a picture of someone that had an sl8  i think but i cant find it now! does anyone have one and if so...how is it? worth the money from star?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: NuclearRain2012 on May 23, 2008, 09:44:14 PM
Quote from: "Corporal209"
Nice! FPS?
Thinking about roughly 275-300 area because if you saw what it did to a CD youd be shocked or im just one of the best aims with a DEagle(The bb split it in two on the side then when all the around the inside of the disc and came back out the entry hole when my friend threw it in the air, ill go get the CD monday and take a pic)
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Angrycanadian on June 02, 2008, 09:59:04 PM
There is a Tornado grenade in one of the newer pictures i thought they weren't out yet? :-k
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: babybackribs on June 03, 2008, 12:03:09 AM
Quote from: "Angrycanadian"
There is a Tornado grenade in one of the newer pictures i thought they weren't out yet? :-k
I got it about 2 weeks ago.  I gotsda hookup.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Angrycanadian on June 03, 2008, 01:09:16 AM
Quote from: "babybackribs"
Quote from: "Angrycanadian"
There is a Tornado grenade in one of the newer pictures i thought they weren't out yet? :-k
I got it about 2 weeks ago.  I gotsda hookup.


Thats cool I just pre ordered mine. How do you like it?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: babybackribs on June 03, 2008, 11:02:51 AM
I really like it.  True 360 degree coverage and about a 50 ft. range.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Angrycanadian on June 03, 2008, 04:02:17 PM
Quote from: "babybackribs"
I really like it.  True 360 degree coverage and about a 50 ft. range.


Wow That amazing i can't wait!
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Kruc1fix on June 15, 2008, 05:13:24 PM
Paul D wog, how did you keep the Armalite logo on your painted M15?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: BoltActionRob on June 20, 2008, 12:31:50 PM
Quote from: "Kruc1fix"
Paul D wog, how did you keep the Armalite logo on your painted M15?

I must say, Kruc1fix, your setup is relatively BAD ASS looking.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Kruc1fix on June 29, 2008, 09:19:49 PM
Quote from: "BoltActionRob"
Quote from: "Kruc1fix"
Paul D wog, how did you keep the Armalite logo on your painted M15?

I must say, Kruc1fix, your setup is relatively BAD ASS looking.

Thank you! I really appreciate it when people give me comments like this after I put so much into it.

If anyone is interested I will be selling my vest soon. Im making a post in the for sale section. Everything you see in the pics you get.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: BoltActionRob on June 29, 2008, 10:15:48 PM
Quote from: "Kruc1fix"
Quote from: "BoltActionRob"
Quote from: "Kruc1fix"
Paul D wog, how did you keep the Armalite logo on your painted M15?

I must say, Kruc1fix, your setup is relatively BAD ASS looking.

Thank you! I really appreciate it when people give me comments like this after I put so much into it.

If anyone is interested I will be selling my vest soon. Im making a post in the for sale section. Everything you see in the pics you get.


But you remind me of Sgt. Griggs from Call of Duty 4 when you wear that vest!
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: thatoneguy92088 on June 29, 2008, 11:08:01 PM
Kruc1fix

I was wondering where you got the lower rail for your m15a4. I have the non ris m15 and want to add an RIS, but I put the battery in the foregrip.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Kruc1fix on June 29, 2008, 11:16:34 PM
http://www.airsplat.com/Items/AC-MNT-HGR16S.htm (http://www.airsplat.com/Items/AC-MNT-HGR16S.htm)

Boltactionrob, Thanks, I think?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: m249gunner on June 29, 2008, 11:20:32 PM
is that rail metal? its exactly what i want for my m4. :shock:
edit: is that the same as an ris?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Kruc1fix on June 29, 2008, 11:35:35 PM
Mine is, i'm not sure if that one is metal but it looks EXACTLY like mine. So i'm assuming its the same one.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: deathbydanish on July 02, 2008, 02:20:20 PM
Quote from: "Kruc1fix"
http://www.airsplat.com/Items/AC-MNT-HGR16S.htm

Boltactionrob, Thanks, I think?

lulz racism.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: oldgamefreak on July 02, 2008, 02:25:36 PM
Quote from: "thatoneguy92088"
Kruc1fix

I was wondering where you got the lower rail for your m15a4. I have the non ris m15 and want to add an RIS, but I put the battery in the foregrip.

I have one on my M4 it holds a PEQ with 2 batteries in it. they just bolt on. It should be metal.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: jones4ms on July 02, 2008, 09:26:36 PM
sarc, did you paint your glock?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: SARC on July 03, 2008, 11:56:36 PM
Quote from: "jones4ms"
sarc, did you paint your glock?


Nope,  came that way from factory.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: jones4ms on July 04, 2008, 12:16:42 AM
nice looks good
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: airsofting4god on July 10, 2008, 04:27:44 PM
nice ggb
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: jones4ms on July 11, 2008, 12:26:50 AM
Quote from: "airsofting4god"
nice ggb


mine ?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: airsofting4god on July 11, 2008, 06:51:38 AM
yeah
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: jones4ms on July 11, 2008, 09:00:10 AM
cool thanks lol
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: BATMAN on July 11, 2008, 04:55:46 PM
Oh man, Matt, your 240 is so cool that even the magazine gets its own spot in the photos section.  I'm freaking jealous.
-BATMAN
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Ganef on July 16, 2008, 07:47:24 AM
Karbine,
Make you photos smaller. I see a pistol grip in the top one and a blurry screwdriver in the other.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Altered_Soul on July 16, 2008, 01:41:14 PM
Quote from: "Uchiha Itachi"
Fiber body
Drop Mag button
3.5x scope
top 20mm rail
365fps
Metal Cocking handle/Metal Hopup
3 numbered K rails

(http://i8.photobucket.com/albums/a12/Soujiro_/P1010046.jpg)

Looks nice for a "clone" TSD/SRC, I was thinking of picking one up for canibalising some of the parts over to my other guns/projects, but it looks to be a decent standalone.

I had one question though, how does the Drop mag button work?  I couldn't find a decent demonstration of it.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Uchiha Itachi on July 16, 2008, 01:54:31 PM
I don't consider it a clone since some of the gun, like the electricals, they did themselves or put on options other guns don't like the rails and mag button. But then again if it isn't a Marui it is basically a clone. Everytime I take my CA out it breaks or something falls off. Last time the connector pin broke lose and the hicap broke while not in use. It doesn't even have its original outer barrel assembly since the AG36 bent it.

:50 to 1:06

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=63cxeEq5gUk (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=63cxeEq5gUk)
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Farslayer on July 26, 2008, 10:10:52 PM
XM,

Man, those are great looking AEG's.  Good job.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: XavierMace on July 28, 2008, 02:25:24 PM
Quote from: "Farslayer"
XM,

Man, those are great looking AEG's.  Good job.

Thanks.  The one is retardedly long (as it was meant to be).  But I am pleased with the way most of them have turned out, even the ones I did just out of boredom (like the pistol).
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: babybackribs on August 04, 2008, 03:01:57 AM
Rogue Fox - Did you purposely paint your guns like that?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Bow-tie Assasin on August 04, 2008, 11:28:52 AM
Quote from: "babybackribs"
Rogue Fox - Did you purposely paint your guns like that?

Don’t be a dick just because he has different taste then you.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: babybackribs on August 05, 2008, 03:16:04 AM
I'll say whatever I damn well please.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Bow-tie Assasin on August 05, 2008, 09:47:09 AM
Nice paint job Rogue fox. The fake leaves do make it look a little weird though :? .
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Altered_Soul on August 05, 2008, 11:11:06 AM
Rogue Fox I am not trying to be a douche here, but that paint will most likely stick out more than it would have if you had just left it the stock color.  Luckily, it is fixable and though you don't have to do what 99% of everyone else is doing, you should probably try making it a little less contrasting.  The fake leaves do have to go though, as I think it would only work if you were running in an OP in Grandma's living room taking down the terrorists holding her hostage.  Because grandma has a huuuuuge living room with plenty of sniper spots surrounded by fake poinsettias.  :D
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Bow-tie Assasin on August 05, 2008, 11:47:48 AM
Quote from: "Altered_Soul"
Rogue Fox I am not trying to be a douche here, but that paint will most likely stick out more than it would have if you had just left it the stock color.  Luckily, it is fixable and though you don't have to do what 99% of everyone else is doing, you should probably try making it a little less contrasting.  The fake leaves do have to go though, as I think it would only work if you were running in an OP in Grandma's living room taking down the terrorists holding her hostage.  Because grandma has a huuuuuge living room with plenty of sniper spots surrounded by fake poinsettias.  :D
 =D> Perfectly said. Not an insult, just constructive criticism.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Sergeant First Class Keenan on August 05, 2008, 07:54:33 PM
Nice Picture Raith.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Kodiak on August 05, 2008, 10:10:33 PM
Raith, is that really yours? very nice picture. A beautiful gun.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Vince on August 05, 2008, 10:13:14 PM
Quote from: "Kodiak"
Raith, is that really yours? very nice picture. A beautiful gun.

No, he scanned it out of a Selous Scouts manual.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Raith on August 05, 2008, 11:16:05 PM
Quote from: "Kodiak"
Raith, is that really yours? very nice picture. A beautiful gun.

Its mostly Photoshop. :P

I'll get around to taking some not psycho photos of it soon.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: impulse95 on August 21, 2008, 08:13:09 PM
man i lov that CA CQB SEAL
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: usafcajun on August 24, 2008, 07:23:56 PM
Quote from: "Raith"
Quote from: "Kodiak"
Raith, is that really yours? very nice picture. A beautiful gun.

Its mostly Photoshop. :P

I'll get around to taking some not psycho photos of it soon.


Very nice photo.....and photoshop work.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: sethb7290 on August 26, 2008, 06:37:22 PM
Madcatjoe

lovin the look of that M-16, props man.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: madcatjoe on August 27, 2008, 11:44:40 AM
me too :D
thanks man. it has since been changed slightly, as i removed the sling and buttstock mag pouch, and added a single point adapter behind the reciever. ive still yet to try it out in the new config, but it shouldnt be a problem.
-Joe
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Ares on August 27, 2008, 05:27:44 PM
Pardon my ignorance, maybe its a Marine thing. Is there a method to all the numbers? Is it simply identification?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Vince on August 27, 2008, 05:35:53 PM
Quote from: "Ares"
Pardon my ignorance, maybe its a Marine thing. Is there a method to all the numbers? Is it simply identification?

Armory numbers.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Sergeant First Class Keenan on August 28, 2008, 01:12:00 PM
Yep, you'll have one on your issued rifle too.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Ares on August 28, 2008, 04:01:14 PM
sweet. then ill put those numbers all over my airsoft gear
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: madcatjoe on August 28, 2008, 09:31:51 PM
dont overdo it!
-Joe
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Ares on August 29, 2008, 10:50:08 AM
nah, man. all over EVERYTHING
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Sergeant First Class Keenan on August 29, 2008, 11:56:54 AM
Last 4 SSN on your gear. Blood type on body armor, knee, elbow pads.

And I think part of your Battlefield tracker ID would be WX55AA3121, which would be on your blouse, trouser's, boots, belt, and ACH. No names over the net yous!
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: madcatjoe on August 29, 2008, 12:17:35 PM
Quote from: "Malicious Ind"
Last 4 SSN on your gear. Blood type on body armor, knee, elbow pads.

And I think part of your Battlefield tracker ID would be WX55AA3121, which would be on your blouse, trouser's, boots, belt, and ACH. No names over the net yous!
you guys have a different method than us. we do first initial, last initial, last 4
-Joe
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Sergeant First Class Keenan on August 29, 2008, 08:25:15 PM
When I was in the Marine Corps, we did the stamp with the full last name and last 4.

The BFT ID, is the unit UIC last 4 and sometimes plt/squad.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: madcatjoe on September 09, 2008, 01:27:25 PM
recoilef: looking great! that MEU is awesome, but why the A1 trigger? :D
-Joe
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: RecoilEF on September 09, 2008, 09:02:42 PM
Quote
recoilef: looking great! that MEU is awesome, but why the A1 trigger? :D

Haha, thanks! I'm especially proud of my MEU, I had to do alot of work on it to get it working right, I even had to white dot the sights ahah! But I guess thats how all airsoft guns are if you want to upgrade it nicely. Anyways, I stuck with the A1 trigger since i didn't care too much about getting a new one...and for about $40 for one it made the idea less appealing. Speaking of 1911's did you get your Kimber worked on?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: madcatjoe on September 10, 2008, 10:14:51 AM
just finished!
check the pic in the pic thread :D
woot
-Joe
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: RecoilEF on September 10, 2008, 09:02:51 PM
Nice, I just took a look at it. Were your Novak sights dotted when you got it? Cause mine weren't. Are you using TM's MEU mags? I wanted to buy some but decided against it since I didnt need anymore pistol mags lol. Looks nice, i bet she purrs haha.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Farslayer on September 12, 2008, 07:45:57 AM
Ribs,
I don't know how you do it man..... :x
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: madcatjoe on September 12, 2008, 09:06:18 AM
yes, they were... but this is a nova kit. i guess thats why :D
ribs: can i touch your big barrett? is that wrong?
-Joe
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: babybackribs on September 12, 2008, 12:57:24 PM
Quote from: "Farslayer"
Ribs,
I don't know how you do it man..... :x
Just work really hard and give up on school.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: airsofting4god on September 12, 2008, 03:22:53 PM
WOW Babybackribs that 50. cal  looks very nice!!
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: babybackribs on September 29, 2008, 03:57:34 PM
Hey Nerd, is that the GSG-5?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Nerd on September 29, 2008, 08:12:03 PM
Quote from: "babybackribs"
Hey Nerd, is that the GSG-5?


It sure is. Still waiting on my parts for it. got a new foregrip and stock in the mail. took forever for the mags to get here
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Altered_Soul on September 30, 2008, 06:25:43 PM
Hey Rogue Fox,

What is the second attached rail you have on there on the optics bridge of your G36? Is that a rail ripped from an MP7, or something else?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Rogue Fox on September 30, 2008, 10:04:35 PM
You hit it dead on, i ripped it off my broken mp7. I havent gotten around to trimming it yet.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: BATMAN on October 02, 2008, 01:04:57 AM
Wow, David, that is actually starting to look like a PKM!  I'm impressed!  Too bad it feeds on the wrong side.
-BATMAN
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Vince on October 13, 2008, 05:58:24 PM
VERY NICE BLASTER MISTER BENCOMO
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Raith on October 13, 2008, 06:55:19 PM
Quote from: "Vince"
VERY NICE BLASTER MISTER BENCOMO

ITS BEEN SUCH A LONG TIIIIMMMEEEE....
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: GnarlyBlakers on October 14, 2008, 07:28:15 PM
All I can say usmcpog is

"HOLY SHIT BALLS"
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: MoscowWarrior on October 14, 2008, 08:23:57 PM
WOOOOOW!!  :shock:  :shock:now if its family stash than which ones are urs. and or did u take some of u buddies guns to add it to the size of your collection
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: usmcpog on October 14, 2008, 09:22:39 PM
Quote from: "MoscowWarrior"
WOOOOOW!!  :shock:  :shock:now if its family stash than which ones are urs. and or did u take some of u buddies guns to add it to the size of your collection

Yes, all these AEG's, GBB's, and NBB, and Blackpoint launcher belong to my son, my wife and myself.  I am not going to lie, it helps MY WIFE WORKS FOR AIRSOFT EXTREME SAN DIEGO 8)

Don't believe me, come on down on Mondays, Wednesdays, Thursdays from 500 to 800 or Saturdays from 1100 am to 800 pm and ask for Daisy and tell her, Lawrence sent you...

As for who owns what, this list reads from left to right...
AEG's/AEP's
TM S-System (wife)
CA M15A4 CQB (wife)
TM MP-5 RAS (wife)
TM M14 EBR (mine)
CA G36 w/AG36 (mine)
CA SL8 SD (mine)
CA G36C (mine)
TM SR-16 (mine)
TM M-4 New Type (mine)
G&G UMP (mine)
TM MAC 10 (mine)
Custom MAGPUL M-4 (son)
Custom shorty M-4 w/strike face (son)
TM P90 (son)
TM MP-7 (son)

Again, from left to right
1st row GBB/NBB
KWA M945 (mine)
KWA M93R (mine)
WA Parkerized 1911(mine)
Blackpoint launcher (wife)
TM M-9 Chrome (mine)
KWA 1911A1 (son)
KW USP full size (wife)

2nd row GBB/NBB
KWA G17 (mine)
KWA G17 OD grip (mine)
KWA G17 SD (mine)
WA Infinity 6" (mine)
TM Mk23 SOCOM (mine)
TM Mk23 SOCOM (wife)
TM P226 (wife)
KWA USP Compant (wife)
WA Wilson Combat "Vreaker" V12 SCW (wife)
WA Wilson Combat "Vreaker" V12 SCW (wife)
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: MoscowWarrior on October 14, 2008, 09:45:25 PM
gosh u fuckn lucky
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: sethb7290 on October 14, 2008, 11:26:19 PM
Quote from: "usmcpog"
Quote from: "MoscowWarrior"
WOOOOOW!!  :shock:  :shock:now if its family stash than which ones are urs. and or did u take some of u buddies guns to add it to the size of your collection

Yes, all these AEG's, GBB's, and NBB, and Blackpoint launcher belong to my son, my wife and myself.  I am not going to lie, it helps MY WIFE WORKS FOR AIRSOFT EXTREME SAN DIEGO 8)

Don't believe me, come on down on Mondays, Wednesdays, Thursdays from 500 to 800 or Saturdays from 1100 am to 800 pm and ask for Daisy and tell her, Lawrence sent you...


well that might be kind of inconvenient since most of us live in Arizona lolz
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Rogue Fox on October 15, 2008, 02:03:25 PM
usmcpog,

I envy your G36/SL8 collection
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: deathbydanish on October 18, 2008, 12:42:24 PM
Hey Raith, what are the specs on that battery?

I'm getting a little tired of using the bulky stock on my CQB-R and have been looking to try out one of those magpuls.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Raith on October 18, 2008, 08:56:39 PM
Quote from: "deathbydanish"
Hey Raith, what are the specs on that battery?

I'm getting a little tired of using the bulky stock on my CQB-R and have been looking to try out one of those magpuls.

7.4v 1000mAh 10C LiPo.  Apparently thats not very impressive, but it does seem to work well for what I want it to do.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: deathbydanish on October 21, 2008, 03:21:06 PM
Is it a custom made battery pack or can it be purchased online? I want to test the waters a bit on LiPo batteries.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Raith on October 21, 2008, 03:28:51 PM
Quote from: "deathbydanish"
Is it a custom made battery pack or can it be purchased online? I want to test the waters a bit on LiPo batteries.

Can be purchased online.  It is made by Socomgear.

http://socomgear.com/english/index.php? ... ducts_id=8 (http://socomgear.com/english/index.php?main_page=product_info&cPath=2&products_id=8)
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: deathbydanish on October 23, 2008, 04:54:04 PM
Thank you for the link, I see that it comes with a Tamiya connector, is it safe to use a Dean's connector instead?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Raith on October 23, 2008, 10:20:50 PM
Quote from: "deathbydanish"
Thank you for the link, I see that it comes with a Tamiya connector, is it safe to use a Dean's connector instead?

I don't know for sure, but I don't see why not.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: corporalred on October 26, 2008, 09:49:30 PM
Vince, I love the gun and all the bathroom glory! =)
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: sethb7290 on October 26, 2008, 09:58:09 PM
Vince i have a question, what company makes that delta rings called and where did you get it from? i've seen it on alot of M16/M4's and i want to get oine, but i need to know what its called first.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: corporalred on October 26, 2008, 09:58:58 PM
who's Wince? ;)
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: sethb7290 on October 26, 2008, 10:00:20 PM
Quote from: "corporalred"
who's Wince? ;)
fixed  it lol
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Vince on October 26, 2008, 10:01:35 PM
Umm, I don't have a delta ring on that gun.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: sethb7290 on October 26, 2008, 10:05:19 PM
Quote from: "Vince"
Umm, I don't have a delta ring on that gun.
ok, that clear things up a bit, well what is that thing that replaced the delta ring is it a free float RIS or is it something else?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Vince on October 26, 2008, 11:25:30 PM
Quote from: "sethb7290"
Quote from: "Vince"
Umm, I don't have a delta ring on that gun.
ok, that clear things up a bit, well what is that thing that replaced the delta ring is it a free float RIS or is it something else?

It's a barrel nut that holds on a RAS.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Farslayer on November 02, 2008, 06:41:23 PM
Matt, that looks so nice....jealous. :(
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: ATown on November 08, 2008, 02:31:07 PM
wow im lovin those guns,
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: sargentwolf on November 12, 2008, 09:37:30 PM
highly impressed by all the weapons on here.

question: that g-36 gernader. how much does the gernade launcher throw off the weapon balance? a lot? a omfgwtfiswrongwithHK lot? thinking about getting one.

im jealous at all the saws, shrikes, RPK's, m-60's, and esp the 240B.......ill throw up pics of the 1919 when i get home again....gawd i miss being a support gunner.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: babybackribs on November 13, 2008, 12:10:25 AM
Who made the optics module, XM?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: XavierMace on November 13, 2008, 01:12:45 AM
It was custom made by a friend of mine over on AS-R.  Unfortunately he doesn't have the time to make more of them, but I'm going to look into reverse engineering it and making some changes as well.  I don't expect that to be any time in the immediate future, but I can keep you updated if you would like.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Altered_Soul on November 13, 2008, 08:55:07 AM
Quote from: "sargentwolf"
highly impressed by all the weapons on here.

question: that g-36 gernader. how much does the gernade launcher throw off the weapon balance? a lot? a omfgwtfiswrongwithHK lot? thinking about getting one.

Its heavy, and during a full day OP it will start to wear on you.  The best way to deal with it is A) Get the KV Stock with a large battery to balance it out and B) Get a good, solid sling to keep it off your arms all the time.  I used a single point bungee sling at BHII and it cut off circulation to my right arm (I am a left so the sling was over my right shoulder).  I really wished I had bought a better sling for the occasion.  But yes, it is heavy.  Nothing some strength training can't help to lift it and keep it lifted, but lugging it around all day got wearying.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: babybackribs on November 13, 2008, 12:50:42 PM
Quote from: "XavierMace"
It was custom made by a friend of mine over on AS-R.  Unfortunately he doesn't have the time to make more of them, but I'm going to look into reverse engineering it and making some changes as well.  I don't expect that to be any time in the immediate future, but I can keep you updated if you would like.
Nah, don't worry about it.  It does look cool though.  Just missing a GL.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Fat_Santa54 on November 17, 2008, 07:41:33 PM
^ So is your M4 a gas rifle? becuase if it's not whats the point of having a gas piston (or a spring in the barrell is what it looks like to me), not bashing you the gun looks awsome, just curoius about the spring.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Fat_Santa54 on November 17, 2008, 07:42:12 PM
^ So is your M4 a gas rifle or have some sort of bolt action setup like that top-tech gun? becuase if it's not whats the point of having a gas piston (or a spring in the barrell is what it looks like to me), not bashing you the gun looks awsome, just curoius about the spring.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Firehead on November 18, 2008, 02:11:57 AM
He is attempting to replicate that operating system for gas piston operated guns(HK, LWRC, POF).
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: babybackribs on November 18, 2008, 01:06:37 PM
Quote from: "Firehead"
He is attempting to replicate that operating system for gas piston operated guns(HK, LWRC, POF).
Yup.  It is more on par with the Bushmaster or HK416 piston.  Kinda hard to get the LWRC assembly look I was going for.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Fat_Santa54 on November 18, 2008, 01:07:09 PM
^yes, i know what the system is, but is it purley asthetic or does it actually do someting?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: -MAD- SARGE on November 18, 2008, 06:41:53 PM
Matt, You Suck :P

Lucky Bastard  ;)
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: saw gunner clayton on November 19, 2008, 10:09:29 PM
that new krylon hammered steel paint worked woners on the saw.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Ares on November 22, 2008, 11:30:11 AM
so, i decided to try LiPo. Got 2 fusion-packs from Action Hobby. 2 cell 7.4V 800MaH 25c discharge. not a bad little pack so far. i stuffed one down the buffer tube and got rid of the mod stock. i like the slimmer stock better. I still, and will most always, have the railmag on the left, sometimes with the flashlight on the right. quite different from a year ago when i got the weapon.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Fat_Santa54 on November 22, 2008, 09:18:27 PM
^ did you get a lipo that used the Deans connector(or whatever one the G&P uses) or did you convert it?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Ares on November 22, 2008, 11:31:37 PM
the pack i bought had open leads, so i got the deans soldered on while i was there. I think they fucked one of them up though... you have to squeeze the leads to get one of the packs to fire (i bought 2 packs)
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: babybackribs on November 24, 2008, 08:51:51 PM
Hey Raith, where would one go if he wanted to get a tripod and ammo can holder for an M2?  You know where to get just about anything.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Raith on November 24, 2008, 10:11:18 PM
Quote from: "babybackribs"
Hey Raith, where would one go if he wanted to get a tripod and ammo can holder for an M2?  You know where to get just about anything.

Your best bet may be the upcoming SAR Show (Dec) or perhaps the Papago Military Vehicle Show. (Jan)

Confusingly, the nomenclature on a tripod for a M2HB is M3 Tripod.  The 1919 uses an M2 tripod.

They cost a whole lot.  Be prepared to spend anywhere from $500.00 - $1500.00 depending on what all you're getting.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: babybackribs on November 25, 2008, 02:08:07 AM
Quote from: "Raith"
Quote from: "babybackribs"
Hey Raith, where would one go if he wanted to get a tripod and ammo can holder for an M2?  You know where to get just about anything.

Your best bet may be the upcoming SAR Show (Dec) or perhaps the Papago Military Vehicle Show. (Jan)

Confusingly, the nomenclature on a tripod for a M2HB is M3 Tripod.  The 1919 uses an M2 tripod.

They cost a whole lot.  Be prepared to spend anywhere from $500.00 - $1500.00 depending on what all you're getting.
Hmmm.  Might have to reconsider buying one.  Might just make one myself.  Where did you get yours?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Raith on November 25, 2008, 09:55:33 AM
Quote from: "babybackribs"
Hmmm.  Might have to reconsider buying one.  Might just make one myself.  Where did you get yours?

Ganef made mine.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: babybackribs on November 25, 2008, 12:53:03 PM
Quote from: "Raith"
Ganef made mine.
Hmmm.  I might just need to get him to make one for me.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: usafcajun on November 26, 2008, 12:23:18 PM
What doesn't Ganef make?   :lol:
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Ranger_Robby on November 26, 2008, 05:12:50 PM
Quote from: "usafcajun"
What doesn't Ganef make?   :lol:
Strawberry milkshakes and pantyhose
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Rogue Fox on January 05, 2009, 10:21:13 AM
Altered soul, I love your G36KA1, where did you get that longer outer barrel? Ive never seen one like that.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Altered_Soul on January 05, 2009, 01:08:17 PM
Quote from: "Rogue Fox"
Altered soul, I love your G36KA1, where did you get that longer outer barrel? Ive never seen one like that.

Its a PDI PSG-1 fluted outerbarrel, no longer made.  Kinda like this current production one:

http://www.redwolfairsoft.com/redwolf/a ... odID=18482 (http://www.redwolfairsoft.com/redwolf/airsoft/ProductDetail?prodID=18482)

But mine is completely fluted, no vents like on that one.

Also its obviously threaded at the end.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: tastyfish21 on January 25, 2009, 10:42:10 AM
awesome work on the g3. did the forearm take any grinding to fit right? what about a battery? looks real good so far man. i just checked the tracking on the set i ordered. ill have mine Tuesday.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Rogue Fox on January 25, 2009, 07:16:32 PM
Quote from: "tastyfish21"
did the forearm take any grinding to fit right? .

Sorry I had to point it out.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: tastyfish21 on January 25, 2009, 08:16:37 PM
Quote from: "Rogue Fox"
Quote from: "tastyfish21"
did the forearm take any grinding to fit right? .

Sorry I had to point it out.

You had to point out the fact that I used the term "fore arm" instead of "fore grip."  Any specific reason behind that? I was just asking a valid question to find out if there were any issues applying a real steel wooden piece to an airsoft rifle which I own and am also in the process of doing the same modification. Thank you for pointing out that I used an incorrect term. I would have to guess I am now a better person for knowing to from now until forever say fore grip.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Ranger_Robby on January 26, 2009, 09:17:36 AM
Nice looking G3 Oldgamefreak!all of them are looking very schweet!
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Rogue Fox on January 26, 2009, 03:22:39 PM
Quote from: "tastyfish21"
Quote from: "Rogue Fox"
Quote from: "tastyfish21"
did the forearm take any grinding to fit right? .

Sorry I had to point it out.

You had to point out the fact that I used the term "fore arm" instead of "fore grip."  Any specific reason behind that? I was just asking a valid question to find out if there were any issues applying a real steel wooden piece to an airsoft rifle which I own and am also in the process of doing the same modification. Thank you for pointing out that I used an incorrect term. I would have to guess I am now a better person for knowing to from now until forever say fore grip.

It was really worth that long of a response? and you stated the reason yourself.
Quote
Thank you for pointing out that I used an incorrect term

Something tells me that a , "oh yeah woops, wrong term" Response would have been much easier and well suited. Just an Idea :-k
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Vince on January 26, 2009, 04:06:56 PM
ALRIGHT GIRLS YOU'RE BOTH PRETTY

NOW SHUT THE FUCK UP
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: eggman998 on January 26, 2009, 04:09:13 PM
Quote from: "Vince"
ALRIGHT GIRLS YOU'RE BOTH PRETTY

NOW SHUT THE **** UP

well said.  Signature worthy, perhaps?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: oldgamefreak on January 26, 2009, 04:23:12 PM
Quote from: "Rogue Fox"
Quote from: "tastyfish21"
Quote from: "Rogue Fox"
Quote from: "tastyfish21"
did the forearm take any grinding to fit right? .

Sorry I had to point it out.

You had to point out the fact that I used the term "fore arm" instead of "fore grip."  Any specific reason behind that? I was just asking a valid question to find out if there were any issues applying a real steel wooden piece to an airsoft rifle which I own and am also in the process of doing the same modification. Thank you for pointing out that I used an incorrect term. I would have to guess I am now a better person for knowing to from now until forever say fore grip.

It was really worth that long of a response? and you stated the reason yourself.
Quote
Thank you for pointing out that I used an incorrect term

Something tells me that a , "oh yeah woops, wrong term" Response would have been much easier and well suited. Just an Idea :-k

Actually why don’t you GOOGLE H&K forearm. You will get about 30 pages of results. Why don’t you email all of those companies and tell them they're wrong! Case in point http://www.ar15pro.com/category/775-AR1 ... earms.aspx (http://www.ar15pro.com/category/775-AR15_Tactical_Forearms.aspx)

Damn even SUREFIRE has it wrong they call it a FOREND. As far as their concerned a FOREGRIP mounts to the FOREND. But damn I’m happy to know that your right and half of the world is wrong!!!!! Thanks for setting us strait.

http://www.surefire.com/VerticalForegripWeaponLights (http://www.surefire.com/VerticalForegripWeaponLights)
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Ranger_Robby on January 26, 2009, 04:27:24 PM
Quote from: "eggman998"
Quote from: "Vince"
ALRIGHT GIRLS YOU'RE BOTH PRETTY

NOW SHUT THE **** UP

well said.  Signature worthy, perhaps?
I sure as hell would say so
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: eggman998 on January 26, 2009, 04:34:43 PM
damn you beat me to it  :-({|=
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Exarach on January 26, 2009, 08:01:20 PM
Quote from: "eggman998"
damn you beat me to it  :-({|=
+1
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Rogue Fox on January 26, 2009, 10:16:19 PM
My last post on this subject, but I think Ive actually wasted the least amount of time on this issue out of everyone that has responded to it.. ](*,)

Now, back to discussing the weapon photos mabey?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: tastyfish21 on January 26, 2009, 10:18:58 PM
I don't have a problem someone calling me on something I said that was stupid. Hell, I say a lot of stupid stuff. But don't "point out" someones errors that aren't errors. Thanks to oldgamefreak for sticking up for me though. Much obliged. I normally wouldn't care about an internet argument, but I didn't feel as if I said anything incorrectly. And I didn't admit to using the wrong term. I of all people should know sarcasm doesn't translate well into forums.

Anyhow.... Oldgamefreak, I got my wood stock and fore arm today. I'm not gonna have a chance to get to it until this weekend. You might get a call from me with questions if I get a little lost on the project.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Rogue Fox on January 26, 2009, 10:32:34 PM
I realize I am contradicting my last post by posting on this matter again, but I belive in settling things instead of leaving issues un resolved.

If/since I am indeed wrong about forearm being the wrong term for that section of the rifle I apologize for making the faulty corrections, I've just never heard of that part being called a forearm, Ive always known it as a forend or foregrip[plus in my mind the term forearm just doesnt seem to describe the part right, even if you are reffering to the rifle as body parts who the heck holds thier forearm?]

anyway, my apologies, I guess its just one of those terms like tomatoe/tomato and potatoe/potato, the terms are interchangeable but everyone has thier own opinion.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: tastyfish21 on January 27, 2009, 10:18:56 AM
No worries man.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: XavierMace on February 22, 2009, 10:58:58 PM
Matt, don't blame me for getting the FNC.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Raith on March 11, 2009, 10:55:12 PM
Boles,

Your MK46 looks good.  Do you like the TD Bipod?  I was thinking of getting one for my 240.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Boles on March 12, 2009, 08:23:52 AM
Thanks  I do like it alot but my only issue with it is when you want to drop it down in a hurry you have to do both sides instead of one motion like a normal bipod.  And its actually the King arms version I thought about just getting the Cheapo from China on Ebaybanned but paid the extra doh for the king arms one.  its a real nice light weight bipod
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: saw gunner clayton on March 31, 2009, 09:04:21 PM
hell, your mk46 is better than lugging around my metal brick m249.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Bully Dog Airsoft on April 27, 2009, 11:17:45 AM
[smilie=armata_pdt_06.gif]
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Maddsurf on June 06, 2009, 01:14:28 AM
Quote from: "Bully Dog Airsoft"
Hey guys... Do you think that this D-Boys Scar is a reasonable gun??? Just asking because I was thinking of buying it.

http://www.hitguns.com/DBoy-SCAR-L-Full-Metal-Tan-p/bi-sc01-scar-tan.htm


Wrong thread!!

Bizkitcan that gat is sick man!!
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: deathbydanish on June 17, 2009, 11:10:21 AM
Nice Celcius Vince, what are you initial impressions of it?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Raith on June 17, 2009, 09:26:07 PM
SAWs without stocks and are gay.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: azsarge on June 17, 2009, 09:45:49 PM
Boles, it is accurate for a Mk46 to have a Para SAW barrel, but there is no way it would fit past the rail without cutting off the carry handle.  It's a slight mod some guys do with their real Mk46s.

Vince, that's some funny ish bro.

I'll have to post pics of my Real Sword "LT Recce Rifle" and Kim Jong "SEAL18 Mod 1" one of these days.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Sergeant First Class Keenan on June 17, 2009, 09:46:47 PM
yeah but un-painted stocks are gayer.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Vince on June 17, 2009, 11:20:49 PM
Quote from: "deathbydanish"
Nice Celcius Vince, what are you initial impressions of it?

It shoots really hot.

I have only been using it at the 'hardcore' games we've been having every few weekends lately.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: madcatjoe on June 20, 2009, 02:47:46 PM
malicious IND: thats a real ACOG, right?
-Joe
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Sergeant First Class Keenan on June 21, 2009, 10:54:08 AM
Nope its a FOCOG, from ebaybanned.

Looks legit and has a 4x32. Perfect for airsoft.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: madcatjoe on June 21, 2009, 02:10:38 PM
wow. i didnt know that they made a trademarked TA31. whats the reticle like? got a picture of that?
i may consider it to replace my G&Ps...
do you have a link to it? i searched the site, and cant find one with those trademarks...
-Joe
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Sergeant First Class Keenan on June 21, 2009, 08:21:39 PM
http://www.ebairsoft.com/ta31-combat-sc ... -1710.html (http://www.ebairsoft.com/ta31-combat-scope-black-p-1710.html)

Thats the one I have. The retical looks just like that.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: madcatjoe on June 22, 2009, 04:37:05 PM
looks just like my G&P then, but yours has trademarks...
hmmm. maybe i will.
thanks for that info
-Joe
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Rorschach on June 22, 2009, 06:52:43 PM
Bizkitcan, your gun is the most externally appealing gun Ive seen. EVER

Where did you get the PTW externals?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Ares on June 23, 2009, 07:15:35 AM
My goal was to make GIJOEshmoes M4, just like any 'ol rifle you'd see in a newspaper photo from Iraq. So that's my primary. The project gun on the right started as a zombie killer from G&P, but I slapped on the front set from a special forces M4. I want to change the grip, and I'll paint the front sight. The M4 on the left will remain black.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: yammie r6s on June 26, 2009, 04:22:11 PM
noveske magpul - g&p internals - nice set up
madbull spring and barrel + a socom gear lipo
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: deathbydanish on July 20, 2009, 11:17:25 AM
Damn Vince, that helmet setup come with a Blackhawk helicopter?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: babybackribs on July 20, 2009, 08:41:32 PM
Vince - Is it shooting hot with the stock cylinder?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Vince on July 20, 2009, 08:54:28 PM
Quote from: "babybackribs"
Vince - Is it shooting hot with the stock cylinder?

Yeah, really hot.

I have a really short inner barrel so I am not making as much velocity as I should be. Oh well.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Rorschach on August 03, 2009, 08:39:16 PM
Xavier, how are the Airsoft GI G4's ?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: dirtnapper73 on August 03, 2009, 09:02:01 PM
Quote from: "Rorschach"
Xavier, how are the Airsoft GI G4's ?
I'm curious about them also, was thinking about getting maybe the flaming hog or another cqb friendly model.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Bully Dog Airsoft on August 03, 2009, 09:41:18 PM
A friend had a flaming hog, they are pretty cool for mid lvl players.  :D
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: XavierMace on August 03, 2009, 09:43:50 PM
They are really nice for the price.  I have a full review posted here if you are interested: http://www.airsoftretreat.com/reviews/showproduct.php?product=329

I personally don't care for the looks of the particular model I got, but that's what they sent.  The gun was shooting nice and smooth out of the box.  A bit low for outdoor games, but perfect for CQBAZ.  I think Darkhold used it down there on Saturday.  The receiver has no flex at all and if it wasn't for the light weight, you would forget you were playing with a plastic receiver gun.  There's no creaks or wobbles at all.  Same goes for the ICS Sportline I just got in.  The plastics look nearly identical between the two.

I personally find the crane stock included on my model a bit tedious to swap out batteries but it's an otherwise excellent gun for the price.  Just keep in mind, ASGI is often a bit backlogged on builds unless they have the model you want laying around.  Motor might slightly be on the weak side but other than that no complaints.

Just be prepared, the gun ships in absolute bare minimum packaging to save costs.  No fancy pictures or foam, just a plastic tray and cardboard cover.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: dirtnapper73 on August 03, 2009, 09:57:07 PM
Quote from: "Bully Dog Airsoft"
A friend had a flaming hog, they are pretty cool for mid lvl players.  :D
Cool thanks, I have a few higher end guns but im just looking for a cheap cqb m4 style gun, and think that might be it, or i could go for the G&G cqb H.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: DMAN007 on August 29, 2009, 12:11:47 PM
Xavier, how do you like your Dboy Kac PDW? I love the look and feel of this gun and want to get one. I just haven't had the chance to use or see one in action.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: XavierMace on August 29, 2009, 02:22:58 PM
It's a POS.  Even by ACM standards, it's QC standards are horrible.  Internally, it's like you just got whatever they had laying around.  Some people got a metal hopup, some got a clear plastic one.  Some got a metal sector chip, some got a plastic one.  Most people's stock's don't lock in the folding position.  The spring is completely random.  The motor sucks.  Accuracy sucks.  Mine requires a rather firm whack to ensure the mag is locked in regardless of mag used.

Even people who have gotten a "good" one, still replaced half the internal parts.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Bully Dog Airsoft on August 29, 2009, 06:26:01 PM
That’s why I am going to go with a different SPR haha I heard that d boys had flaws like that. My friend john ordered a scar from them and sent it back because the motor gears were stripped and the hop up was the same clear plastic that you were talking about! He now has an Echo 1 G36 haha.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Sykinder on August 31, 2009, 05:34:59 PM
Damn the AK mag long enough?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Bully Dog Airsoft on September 02, 2009, 12:16:21 PM
Can't belive it is finally finished! Machined this with my uncles help in machining class. First one ever for We-Tech gas pistols haha check out my thread in gas guns, by tomorrow or friday I should have a video. And no it's not brass. Anyways here it is tell me what you think!  [smilie=armata_pdt_06.gif]  


(http://img524.imageshack.us/img524/5959/magazine2.jpg) (http://img524.imageshack.us/my.php?image=magazine2.jpg) Image Hosting (http://www.picgames.com/forum/myspace-image-help.php)

(http://img259.imageshack.us/img259/4215/magazine3.jpg) (http://img259.imageshack.us/my.php?image=magazine3.jpg) Image Hosting (http://www.picgames.com/forum/myspace-image-help.php)

(http://img215.imageshack.us/img215/2074/magazine1.jpg) (http://img215.imageshack.us/my.php?image=magazine1.jpg) Image Hosting (http://www.picgames.com/forum/myspace-image-help.php)
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: DMAN007 on September 02, 2009, 08:07:49 PM
Nice work, how many rounds does it hold? it looks like a little over 50... but what exactly did you machine ot out of? just curious :roll:
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Bully Dog Airsoft on September 02, 2009, 08:55:26 PM
T-66 aircraft aluminum, it has a gold coating on it to increase durability haha, and to think about three weeks ago this was just a piece of solid stock aluminum haha, BTW It holds exactly 47 max. I was hoping to have and even number like 50 but hell I'll take it haha, just waiting for the silicone to dry and I'll take her out for a test spin haha. I'll post a youtube video on the thread I have for this in gas powered guns before friday.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Bully Dog Airsoft on September 18, 2009, 12:55:14 AM
My New A&K SPR MOD 0, Upgraded 450fps, systema magnum, M130, ect... With Custom built Kill Cam. I'll have some vids of the kill cam by monday.

 (http://img268.imageshack.us/img268/494/myspr001.jpg) (http://img268.imageshack.us/my.php?image=myspr001.jpg) Image Hosting (http://www.picgames.com/forum/myspace-image-help.php)

(http://img200.imageshack.us/img200/84/myspr003.jpg) (http://img200.imageshack.us/my.php?image=myspr003.jpg) Image Hosting (http://www.picgames.com/forum/myspace-image-help.php)

(http://img196.imageshack.us/img196/3010/myspr005.jpg) (http://img196.imageshack.us/my.php?image=myspr005.jpg) Image Hosting (http://www.picgames.com/forum/myspace-image-help.php)

(http://img196.imageshack.us/img196/1325/myspr004.jpg) (http://img196.imageshack.us/my.php?image=myspr004.jpg) Image Hosting (http://www.picgames.com/forum/myspace-image-help.php)
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: XavierMace on September 18, 2009, 03:18:24 AM
What possible purpose does that "killcam" serve?  The video mode on a Powershot A530 is hardly suitable for "action" scenes.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Bully Dog Airsoft on September 18, 2009, 08:54:19 AM
Thats not a cannon, and it takes pretty good video for what it is. And also It will be video from the kill cam not my cannon your right it does not take good video AT ALL! I have a 8mp with HQ video on it right now.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Exarach on September 18, 2009, 09:27:28 AM
Quote from: "Bully Dog Airsoft"
Thats not a cannon, and it takes pretty good video for what it is. And also It will be video from the kill cam not my cannon your right it does not take good video AT ALL! I have a 8mp with HQ video on it right now.
Just an FYI, I give that camera a 5 minute survival rate, thats being generous. Its a HUGE OBVIOUS target, and while I am totally for the recording and viewing of airsoft footage, that camera is going to shake like a strippers ass on the front of that rifle where it is, rending all but a little of that footage useless. It also crosses 3 of your major target ares if you hold the gun correctly, and interferes with line of sight, are cameras a good idea? Yep. Is that camera a good idea? No......
Your going to get one of those videos similar to the ones kids shoot into the air on a rocket, if your camera survives at all. Just my .02.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Bully Dog Airsoft on September 18, 2009, 09:31:46 AM
Your right wich is why I decided to reinforce the mount and use my husky 8mp hevy duty camera.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Rogue Fox on September 21, 2009, 08:05:37 PM
How does that Sten shoot Xavier? Ive always loved the look of them, did AGM decide to adopt another mag or does it have its own mag type?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: XavierMace on September 22, 2009, 12:48:49 AM
Quote from: "Rogue Fox"
How does that Sten shoot Xavier? Ive always loved the look of them, did AGM decide to adopt another mag or does it have its own mag type?

The mag it comes with is it's own design, but it's supposed to take AGM MP40 mags as well.  The gun itself shoots pretty good, but it's sights making aiming a bit difficult.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: usmcpog on October 26, 2009, 06:43:22 PM
Quote from: "Polie"
how do you like the launcher? That was one of the ones I am looking at buying.

I love them.  They are great equalizers when you are playing against vehicles at an op.  I find them very accurate up to over 200 feet at a point target with a flat trajectory.  I can easily get an area kill at 100 yards.

Quote from: "THE DUNN"
Quote from: "usmcpog"
Went through a selling and buying phase and kind of redid some of my old guns with whatever was left over...



KSC M93R
(http://i288.photobucket.com/albums/ll193/S_P_A_M_SD/P6010087-1.jpg)


is that simunition?

Yes, it is simunition
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Polie on October 26, 2009, 06:57:33 PM
Quote from: "usmcpog"
Quote from: "Polie"
how do you like the launcher? That was one of the ones I am looking at buying.

I love them.  They are great equalizers when you are playing against vehicles at an op.  I find them very accurate up to over 200 feet at a point target with a flat trajectory.  I can easily get an area kill at 100 yards.


awesome.  For me it is between that and the Metadyne launcher.  They both look cool, but the Metadyne uses an air rig.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: usmcpog on October 26, 2009, 08:01:09 PM
The launchers I posted use a remote line and a CO2 or HPA air tank.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Vince on November 10, 2009, 07:38:35 PM
That is pretty cool, Ross.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: SARC on November 10, 2009, 07:43:24 PM
Quote from: "Vince"
That is pretty cool, Ross.

Thank you sir...I like it and am pretty satisfied with it...Will see how it performs this weekend...It chronographed out at 330fps pretty consistently and has a good ROF...Seems to be pretty heavily built...CNC upper good thick ABS (I assume) lower...
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: BATMAN on November 12, 2009, 12:20:41 PM
I had no idea anyone was making a Masada.  I'd really like to see that.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: SARC on November 12, 2009, 08:00:34 PM
Quote from: "BATMAN"
I had no idea anyone was making a Masada.  I'd really like to see that.


Well I'd really like to to shim the GB and give it a workover...So I guess that would constitute you looking at it...
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: busta_cap on November 13, 2009, 05:55:01 PM
Quote from: "SARC"
Quote from: "Vince"
That is pretty cool, Ross.

Thank you sir...I like it and am pretty satisfied with it...Will see how it performs this weekend...It chronographed out at 330fps pretty consistently and has a good ROF...Seems to be pretty heavily built...CNC upper good thick ABS (I assume) lower...
Saw this when I met you the other day..Pretty solid Gun. Especially for the price point. Interesting to see how it performs for you. let us all know.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: SARC on November 15, 2009, 07:17:20 PM
Quote from: "busta_cap"
Quote from: "SARC"
Quote from: "Vince"
That is pretty cool, Ross.

Thank you sir...I like it and am pretty satisfied with it...Will see how it performs this weekend...It chronographed out at 330fps pretty consistently and has a good ROF...Seems to be pretty heavily built...CNC upper good thick ABS (I assume) lower...
Saw this when I met you the other day..Pretty solid Gun. Especially for the price point. Interesting to see how it performs for you. let us all know.

The Masada saw its first outing this week end and was put through its paces for around 20 hours.  The environment was dry with very fine dust.  Lots of fire and maneuver lots of up and down LOTS of Dirt.....It performed admirably and reliably, I only had one failure to feed ( mag related I think ) performed corrective action and moved on...The only draw back was the low FPS which will be remedied probably tomorrow.  I am satisfied ..
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Vince on November 15, 2009, 09:08:17 PM
Where'd you pick it up at, Ross?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: XavierMace on November 16, 2009, 03:28:22 AM
I believe Ron ordered it for him, I could be wrong though.

Ross, what mags were you using with it?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: SARC on November 16, 2009, 09:16:04 AM
http://shop.ehobbyasia.com/aeg/a-k/index.htmlit was $262. to my door and took 3 business days to get here.  It comes with 1 Magpul PTS hi-cap.  I picked up 6 Magpul PTS mids...
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: TriggerHappyBAMF on December 11, 2009, 05:50:12 PM
Quote from: "usmcpog"
Group photo of rifles and SMGs

(http://i741.photobucket.com/albums/xx58/Overkill1369/100_1297-1-1.jpg)

Do you have Army robots to go long with those?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: bigwally77 on December 19, 2009, 05:28:31 PM
good god batman i would totally buy that thing from you in like a heart beat
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Bow-tie Assasin on December 19, 2009, 08:36:07 PM
Jared, Nice Sig! Is that the same sig youve always had (I thought you sold it a while ago)? If it is you should just give it to me since you don't play airsoft :D
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: BATMAN on December 20, 2009, 12:49:47 AM
Quote from: "Bow-tie Assasin"
Jared, Nice Sig! Is that the same sig youve always had (I thought you sold it a while ago)? If it is you should just give it to me since you don't play airsoft :D
Ha ha!  No, Tyler, that is THE Sig; the one that Kit fell on and broke in half!.. then I stared at it for a few seconds and said "We can rebuild him.  We have the technology."  
Quote from: "bigwally77"
good god batman i would totally buy that thing from you in like a heart beat
Yea, I think it's a sexy gun, too.  :)  I think I want to give it another try with a new gun that wasn't previously broken in half; see if I can get it more reliable.

-BATMAN
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Black Fox on February 14, 2010, 01:30:28 PM
To M79 Grenadier

I just got a major boner looking at your BAR and 1919 .30 cal. :!:   Love the jeep too :!:
Who made your BAR and how did you make the .30 cal?

Thanks
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Sykinder on February 14, 2010, 07:22:41 PM
Quote from: "Black Fox"
To M79 Grenadier

I just got a major boner looking at your BAR and 1919 .30 cal. :!:   Love the jeep too :!:
Who made your BAR and how did you make the .30 cal?

Thanks

Well if you read the words above the picture, he made the BAR himself and how he made the .30 cal I'd imagine out of a m249 gearbox but that's my guess.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Black Fox on February 16, 2010, 01:40:16 AM
Quote
Well if you read the words above the picture, he made the BAR himself and how he made the .30 cal I'd imagine out of a m249 gearbox but that's my guess.

I was too busy drooling over the pics to notice the text :D .  Thanks Sykinder.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: busta_cap on February 28, 2010, 01:56:59 PM
Very nice OldGameFreak... The KJW will not let you down. A very solid GBBR platform! Get the ASS buffer kit to up that ROF.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Sykinder on March 21, 2010, 10:02:54 PM
Nice XavierMace, how does it perform?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: XavierMace on March 21, 2010, 10:09:12 PM
Once Jeremiah fixed the selector (which technically didn't effect the performance), so far it shoots fine.  The cooldown is horrible but when the mag is warm, it shoots pretty hot (~400 with .25's) and the blowback is nice and crisp.  The blowback is quite a bit harder than on most smaller gas guns (IE Maruzen MP5k, KSC TMP, KWA Mac11).  I haven't had the chance to compare it to a WE or KJW yet.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: oldgamefreak on March 21, 2010, 10:35:59 PM
Quote from: "XavierMace"
Once Jeremiah fixed the selector (which technically didn't effect the performance), so far it shoots fine.  The cooldown is horrible but when the mag is warm, it shoots pretty hot (~400 with .25's) and the blowback is nice and crisp.  The blowback is quite a bit harder than on most smaller gas guns (IE Maruzen MP5k, KSC TMP, KWA Mac11).  I haven't had the chance to compare it to a WE or KJW yet.
Give me a call and we can test with the KJW.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Black Fox on March 31, 2010, 12:29:04 AM
Armalite Attack

There are so many M-4 out there that they really don't excite me so much any more.  However, yours is the first one that has given me a boner in a while.  Very nice and well done :!:

I have a few questions for you.  First, where does the battery go?  Also, is that a real or replica EOtech dot sight and Magupul stock?  Now days it's getting harder to tell.  Last, what kind of grip did you use.

To top it off though, you need to get a tan Grip Pod for it.  Get a real one though.  The airsoft ones are crap.  You can find good deals on ebay.
(http://ustacticalsupply.com/images/products/display/gps02tan.jpg)

Armalite Attacks gun

(http://i633.photobucket.com/albums/uu56/dakd7/m4001.jpg)
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Vince on March 31, 2010, 12:49:25 AM
Battery goes in the stock, it's a fake EOTech, and that's an airsoft, non-adjustable MIAD and an airsoft version of a KAC VFG.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: armalite attack on March 31, 2010, 07:26:13 AM
Vince is right. The EOtech is a Hurricane and I'm getting a QD stubby grip. The one I have now is the G&G one included.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: AZCW_Andrew on March 31, 2010, 08:12:18 AM
Strip that orange paint off of the tip while you are at it...
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Black Fox on March 31, 2010, 08:43:03 AM
Quote from: "Vince"
Battery goes in the stock, it's a fake EOTech, and that's an airsoft, non-adjustable MIAD and an airsoft version of a KAC VFG.

I take it the battery is a Lipo then?  If so, what the rating on it V/C/mAh?

Thanks
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: AZCW_Andrew on March 31, 2010, 09:05:07 AM
Quote from: "Black Fox"
Quote from: "Vince"
Battery goes in the stock, it's a fake EOTech, and that's an airsoft, non-adjustable MIAD and an airsoft version of a KAC VFG.

I take it the battery is a Lipo then?  If so, what the rating on it V/C/mAh?

Thanks

Assuming it goes in the buffer tube..

The most common batteries for those are like.. 7.4v lipo, 1200mah with a 20c discharge, or a 11.1v 1100mah with a 15c discharge..
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: oldgamefreak on March 31, 2010, 10:05:33 AM
A lot of people have been going with this one for the buffer tube https://fusion-pack.com/productdetail.a ... 74&cat=112 (https://fusion-pack.com/productdetail.aspx?id=174&cat=112)
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: armalite attack on April 03, 2010, 11:39:40 AM
Quote from: "AZCW_Andrew"
Strip that orange paint off of the tip while you are at it...

I'm getting a JP flashhider
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Smoking ACE on April 16, 2010, 03:20:46 PM
i dont know about you, but the masada is one sexy gun grr baby.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Korean_Moon on May 03, 2010, 10:43:28 AM
Robby, do the Emags actually feed better? I know they do for real guns but what about airsoft?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: armalite attack on May 03, 2010, 11:13:17 AM
And do you know how much slimmer than regular pmags they are?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Ranger_Robby on May 03, 2010, 04:29:53 PM
Quote from: "Korean_Moon"
Robby, do the Emags actually feed better? I know they do for real guns but what about airsoft?

they feed great so far, haven't fielded it yet, but i will guess it's just as good as my PTS PMAG which has fed every time although the design is slightly different (see pic below of top view, hard to tell from pic sorry) but this could also be an earlier generation PMAG that I have.

Quote from: "armalite attack"
And do you know how much slimmer than regular pmags they are?

They are the same width as the PMAG, which is honestly the same width as a MAG M16 mag (bad angle in the pic, but they are the same), the only part being thicker is the base plate. The major difference is the angle of the mag and the cut in the front of the mag to accommodate mag wells that are not AR-15 spec (see pic).

(http://i199.photobucket.com/albums/aa35/rvanbuhler/DSC01596.jpg)
(http://i199.photobucket.com/albums/aa35/rvanbuhler/DSC01597.jpg)
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: [NT]Saint on May 12, 2010, 08:27:46 PM
Rogue Fox, is that ASR an Echo 1?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Rogue Fox on May 12, 2010, 10:40:33 PM
Quote from: "[NT
Saint"]Rogue Fox, is that ASR an Echo 1?

Yeah, before the paintjob it had the E1 trades below the scope mount.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: [NT]Saint on May 13, 2010, 07:07:38 AM
Quote from: "Rogue Fox"
Quote from: "[NT
Saint"]Rogue Fox, is that ASR an Echo 1?

Yeah, before the paintjob it had the E1 trades below the scope mount.

How do you like it? Did you put any upgrades in it, or does it shoot good stock?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Rogue Fox on May 13, 2010, 11:20:14 AM
I love it, right now it is stock but after my M4 sells Ill be putting E1's cylinder upgrade kit and a TB into it.

I had previously owned a WELL L96 witch has a slightly longer barrel[and costs more], but the ASR is already more accurate even without upgrades.

I will get some accuracy and range stats this saturday then put up a review on it.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: oldgamefreak on May 13, 2010, 01:13:28 PM
Quote from: "Rogue Fox"
I love it, right now it is stock but after my M4 sells Ill be putting E1's cylinder upgrade kit and a TB into it.

I had previously owned a WELL L96 witch has a slightly longer barrel[and costs more], but the ASR is already more accurate even without upgrades.

I will get some accuracy and range stats this saturday then put up a review on it.

If you really want one just hold off another month and he will probably sell it.  :mrgreen:  (sorry man couldn't resist)
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Rogue Fox on May 13, 2010, 02:19:36 PM
hahaha its ok, OGF is prolly right  :lol:
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Vince on June 14, 2010, 12:50:28 AM
OldGameFreak - I regard your Systema PTW as very fresh.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Ranger_Robby on August 10, 2010, 05:22:47 PM
Quote from: "DMAN007"
My VFC platinum edition with g&p aimpoint and vltor style stock

(http://i805.photobucket.com/albums/yy336/DMAN_X007/M4/IMG_0960.jpg)

If it's a VFC why does it have ECHO1 markings?  :?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Vince on August 10, 2010, 05:54:21 PM
the Echo 1 Platinum guns are made by VFC
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Ranger_Robby on August 11, 2010, 01:55:03 PM
So then it's an Echo1... Calling it a VFC is like driving a Saab 9-2X and saying you drive a Subaru Impreza or having a Pontiac Vibe and saying it's a Toyota Matrix... not that it's a bad thing either way. I'm sure they tweaked things like some of the other guns they rebrand for the better but i just think it is what it is, especially if they made an upgrade or change to VFC's hop up or etc.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: DMAN007 on August 11, 2010, 02:00:10 PM
The entire gun is a match to one of VFC's E series m4's. same internals, hop-up, inner barell...etc. the only difference is the echo 1 trades and it came with an echo 1 hi-cap. The case it came in is almost identical to the one the VFC Scars came in.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Vince on August 11, 2010, 05:46:59 PM
Quote from: "Ranger_Robby"
So then it's an Echo1... Calling it a VFC is like driving a Saab 9-2X and saying you drive a Subaru Impreza or having a Pontiac Vibe and saying it's a Toyota Matrix... not that it's a bad thing either way. I'm sure they tweaked things like some of the other guns they rebrand for the better but i just think it is what it is, especially if they made an upgrade or change to VFC's hop up or etc.

no, not really

it's like saying you drive a Holden Monaro when you have a Pontiac GTO
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: oldgamefreak on August 18, 2010, 06:30:26 AM
Quote from: "XavierMace"
Mmmmm, my precious, I've waited so long.

(http://app.onlinephotofiler.com/Img1/A_0/3/2/2/32230/5a7221caab524f1c945a066444153c76.Large.jpg?u=798bb4be-a587-4363-a2aa-344ee604cf43)
(http://app.onlinephotofiler.com/Img1/A_0/3/2/2/32230/f14e4a912e4a494f8bd4b2d3259b498d.Large.jpg?u=8fb8937f-af6e-46fb-8f43-1be50f230c67)
(http://app.onlinephotofiler.com/Img1/A_0/3/2/2/32230/8c480a92298449288868c846f3c3e547.Large.jpg?u=b8fcd27d-76f1-4e2c-8538-7049bd2b1f70)

I hate you X.........




Just say'n  ;)
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: XavierMace on August 18, 2010, 07:42:31 AM
Heh.  I'll be down at Gearbox after work again and I'll have it along if you wanted to see it.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: carbon14c on August 18, 2010, 08:14:07 AM
wow, lookin' good x...

had my eye on G&G's new toy for a while now as well, how does it feel?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: XavierMace on August 18, 2010, 11:22:19 AM
Feels fantastic.  Much better than my JLS (although that's admittedly not saying much).  It's heavier than I expected but not horribly so (heavier than the prototype at the Shot Show).  Didn't get the chance to shoot it last night because of the rain but so far everything appears to be assembled very well.  The manual has instructions for installing the optics module so that's got my hopes up.  Based on the pictures in the manual, it appears the optics module is a straight clone of the actual FN module.

Unfortunately the handguard design still wasn't designed properly as you can't mount an EGLM with out mods.  It's certainly doable but I was a little saddened that I couldn't just slide off the handguard and mount an Ares or VFC EGLM.

Mag compatibility will need a little playing around with PMags are a no go (no surprise there) as they pretty much just get stuck in the magwell.  MAG midcaps however are also a no go as they do not lock into place.  As far as I can tell thats due to the fact they are shorter than actual AR mags and the angle prevents them from reaching the mag catch.  I'm hoping to be able to try an Emag tonight.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Rogue Fox on August 18, 2010, 12:28:35 PM
If you ever get rid of that let me know X  :D
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: DMAN007 on August 18, 2010, 12:30:36 PM
Quote from: "XavierMace"
Unfortunately the handguard design still wasn't designed properly as you can't mount an EGLM with out mods.  It's certainly doable but I was a little saddened that I couldn't just slide off the handguard and mount an Ares or VFC EGLM.
What kind of and how hard would it be to mod the hanguatd to accept an EGLM?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: oldgamefreak on August 18, 2010, 01:23:40 PM
Quote from: "Rogue Fox"
If you ever get rid of that let me know X  :D

HHHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!
Get in line. I called DIBS last night as soon as he told me about it. :P
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: XavierMace on August 18, 2010, 02:47:47 PM
Quote from: "oldgamefreak"
Quote from: "Rogue Fox"
If you ever get rid of that let me know X  :D

HHHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!
Get in line. I called DIBS last night as soon as he told me about it. :P

This is true.

But in all seriousness, I've been waiting for this gun for almost 4 years.  It's not going anywhere.  I almost had to resort to begging to get it.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: oldgamefreak on August 18, 2010, 03:29:53 PM
Oh I know.......You made that clear last night...........I just needed RogueFox to know I was in line before him. :)

Not like it would matter, he doesn't keep guns for long anyway.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Vince on August 18, 2010, 04:38:14 PM
F2000s aren't my thing but that looks really nice.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: carbon14c on August 18, 2010, 04:43:45 PM
just wondering x, how much did you get it for? and through whom?


i did a bit of googling, looks like they are retailing around $400 USD before shipping..


i really want to get one, can't seem to make the decision though. as for the mags, that's good to know. i have mostly MAG-brand middle capacity magazines, and a couple KWA/Aim-TOP high capacity magazines.. (M4 type)

i've been experimenting with different platforms, especially the bullpup type rifles for the new CQB place.. this one has definitely been an interest for me. i do have a P90, but they are so popular. and i strongly dislike MK5 SMG types.. i just ordered a G&G stubby blowback type M4, but i can't get their g2010 out of my brain  :?


are you planning to do a full review for this rifle x? that would most likely help sway my decision heh  :)

last addition; i did just find the short tan version on ASP for $300. there is most likely a catch though? i have not dealt with that company, so i have no clue what their drawbacks are. if anyone has, feel free to PM me/chime in..
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: XavierMace on August 18, 2010, 08:16:22 PM
Yes, the review will be posted on AS-R as all my stuff is.  As for where it came from and the cost, the magical gun fairies dropped it off at my door.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: carbon14c on August 18, 2010, 08:18:08 PM
ah, i see. so it works like a tooth fairy, you just put some BB's under your door mat?  :lol:


i'll keep my eyes open on ASR
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: XavierMace on August 18, 2010, 09:45:47 PM
Something like that.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: AlexDean on August 20, 2010, 05:01:24 AM
Quote from: "gixser13"
(http://i8.photobucket.com/albums/a16/ladedaa/some_01.jpg)

(http://i300.photobucket.com/albums/nn32/TKovacs2/3032483620_f1ab5def6f.jpg)
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: carbon14c on August 23, 2010, 05:42:21 PM
victorious; it looks good.. i don't think i have seen one like that on here for a while



but, oldgamefreak's CQBR MAXII is still dominating that thread atm...  :lol:
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: uwanaugoda on August 23, 2010, 07:08:58 PM
(http://i866.photobucket.com/albums/ab226/uwanaugoda/P1010086.jpg?t=1282615713)
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: VICTORIOUS on August 23, 2010, 09:19:51 PM
Yeah, rails for a AK74u are kinda hard to get here in the states, and most people go with an mp5 or M4 for a short gun. I wanted something different. This is the second AK I built, and by far my most customized gun. I am going to try out those Beta Project mags to see if they are any good, and I might put on a 552 replica.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: oldgamefreak on August 24, 2010, 06:25:09 AM
Quote from: "carbon14c"
victorious; it looks good.. i don't think i have seen one like that on here for a while



but, oldgamefreak's CQBR MAXII is still dominating that thread atm...  :lol:

Thanks!!!! As soon as I get a few more things done I'll post up new pics.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: carbon14c on August 24, 2010, 06:38:05 AM
Quote from: "VICTORIOUS"
Yeah, rails for a AK74u are kinda hard to get here in the states, and most people go with an mp5 or M4 for a short gun. I wanted something different. This is the second AK I built, and by far my most customized gun. I am going to try out those Beta Project mags to see if they are any good, and I might put on a 552 replica.

yeah, that's what i was thinking about when i was looking at it. no shortage of MP5's or M4's.. i will say that ak74u's are very comfortable rifles.. and i'm a picky person when it comes to the "feel" of the weapon

i would like to check that rifle out in person some time, so i'll keep an eye out for your RSVP to the upcoming events

Quote from: "oldgamefreak"
Thanks!!!! As soon as I get a few more things done I'll post up new pics.


for sure! i can't post pictures in that thread until i have a systema PTW of my own  =P~
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: oldgamefreak on August 24, 2010, 10:31:32 AM
My advice.... SAVE YOUR MONEY!!!! if you want to talk about them shoot me a PM with your number. If you get one make sure you have DEEP pockets.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: XavierMace on August 24, 2010, 10:51:56 AM
They make FANTASTIC money pits though.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: carbon14c on August 24, 2010, 10:53:53 AM
if by pit you mean abyss.. heh


i think i will do that, thanks oldgamefreak
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: XavierMace on August 27, 2010, 04:44:35 PM
Quote from: "Price"
Here is My Classic Army m14 ebr match, I have put on a madbull qd supressor on it as well as a tango down fore grip and a replica eotech. Next thing I am doing to it is painting it tan with the mesh markings on it. Sorry for the small pic it was taken from my phone.


(http://i970.photobucket.com/albums/ae183/Us_Navy_Seal234/ericsebr-1-1.jpg)

I think I see something!
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Price on September 30, 2010, 09:32:05 AM
Thanks Xavier i need to get it chronoed to see what its running at.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: coltron on November 07, 2010, 03:00:31 PM
Quote
What y'all think about my new gun?

(http://img827.imageshack.us/img827/165/img0207cq.jpg)

(http://img517.imageshack.us/img517/2402/img0201dgr.jpg)

(http://img574.imageshack.us/img574/465/img0195g.jpg)
Pretty sweet, huh?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Rogue Fox on January 06, 2011, 09:51:52 PM
dang my old ASR is really getting around  :lol:
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: SLINKEY on January 09, 2011, 09:52:22 AM
heres a few of my rifles...
from left to right,

Frankenstein m4, Marushin M500 SSb 6mm, Cyma M14, Echo G36c, Kwa sr10, Echo Red star akm, Ca g36k, Echo M16a1, Ca m15a4 Spc, Echo TFB mp5 Blowback, VFC PDW, Upfront Custom Echo1 g3sg1, Pretty much all of them are upgraded.

(http://i36.servimg.com/u/f36/13/86/74/99/the_sh10.jpg) (http://www.servimg.com/image_preview.php?i=313&u=13867499)
(http://i36.servimg.com/u/f36/13/86/74/99/the_sh11.jpg) (http://www.servimg.com/image_preview.php?i=314&u=13867499)
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Crono0001 on May 17, 2011, 07:59:18 PM
XavierMace just rolled that guy who posted the Sig.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: BATMAN on May 18, 2011, 03:08:09 AM
Haha, whatever dude!  Mine doesn't even have a price tag!  Besides, I actually bought it off Xavier years ago.  :)  Thanks for trying to upstage me, Andrew, lol.

-BATMAN
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: XavierMace on May 18, 2011, 04:16:59 AM
LOL, not a problem, I just couldn't resist.  If you are going to be at the shop tomorrow, I'll bring it with so you can check it out.  The rail is AMAZING.  The gun just feels so much sturdier with it and it's not terribly heavy either.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: XavierMace on June 15, 2011, 07:07:40 PM
morugatu, why on earth would you replace the stock ICS motor and barrel with CA crap?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: morugatu on June 15, 2011, 09:45:40 PM
The stock barrel was made out of very light weight metal and just felt like junk (reminded me of a madbull). I did the same with my ICS M4. I've always had good experiences in terms of accuracy with aftermarket Classic Army barrels. To only reinforce my experience, this article, http://www.6millimeter.info/joomla/inde ... &Itemid=42 (http://www.6millimeter.info/joomla/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=150&Itemid=42), proves that its actually one of the most consistently shaped bores on the market.

As for the motor, I kid you not, it out performs my ICS Turbo on a sp120 with 7.4v 3300mAh 30c battery in terms of RoF. I was very surprised. Trigger response is about the same. I've also chucked them to the side until I finally got some good lipo's. Seems they are just greedy little buggers and need a ton of amps before they show their true nature.

I found this even more puzzling as my ICS M4 motor performed far better in trigger reponse and RoF than the stock motor on stock spring in my L85. And it definitely is running a m120ish spring as it chronographed at 385fps w.20gram bb.

I stopped asking questions and just went with it.  :lol:

But yeah, honestly the only thing I didn't hate about CA's was the accuracy. Sure the hop up was usually lacking, but almost every classic army I've ever shot was superb in terms of accuracy. If only the internals could actually put out more than 1k cycles before developing some random issue.  :roll:

The moment I held my ICS L85 though, I knew from that moment I'd never buy from another brand. Just too much of a hassle to work on other brands when something breaks.  ](*,)
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Crono0001 on June 15, 2011, 10:33:38 PM
Did you just say Madbull barrels are crap?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: morugatu on June 15, 2011, 11:22:18 PM
I'm just not a fan of the new trend with aluminum barrels. I tried madbull, didn't like it, and have since been sticking with CA and Prometheus stainless steel barrels.

I just don't like the idea of an aluminum barrel since its more likely to be worn, warped, bent, etc. than a brass or steel barrel. Just my personal preference, not forcing it on anyone.  :mrgreen:
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: MLA PRO on August 19, 2011, 05:05:43 PM
Better than ARES?
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: XavierMace on August 19, 2011, 08:36:32 PM
I haven't gotten the chance to play with it yet, but the battery isn't in the mag which already gives it a leg up over the Ares.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Crono0001 on August 25, 2011, 12:52:33 AM
My latest acquisition.  ICS M3 Grease Gun.

(http://app.onlinephotofiler.com/img2/A_0/3/2/2/32230/1/cc40ced27bc74c83ba6fcb79dab43210.Large.JPG?u=8e00a513-c29a-4265-9bb7-69cb63f09373) (http://app.onlinephotofiler.com/img2/A_0/3/2/2/32230/1/cc40ced27bc74c83ba6fcb79dab43210.1600x1200.JPG?uid=949a720e-ab35-4a87-adf7-ccc8e10afaf3)


Ugh, you bastard SIE.  Want.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: XavierMace on August 25, 2011, 07:02:46 AM
HA HA.

You can buy one in a couple of months.  I should have my review of it posted over on ASR this coming weekend.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: bailey5671 on October 02, 2011, 01:30:06 AM
SLINKEY i bet your pink m4 is your main primary :)
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: SLINKEY on October 02, 2011, 08:30:18 AM
yep. you cought me man, i bet it would out shoot your black m4 tho
haha
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Shadow on March 04, 2012, 06:04:55 PM
Pride and joy officially completed.
http://www.airsoftarizona.com/index.php?topic=7946.msg254264#msg254264 (http://www.airsoftarizona.com/index.php?topic=7946.msg254264#msg254264)

Started out as an E1 M4A1.  Now has the following:

Polar Star Fusion Engine (425FPS w/0.25g) DMR Setup
Magpul furniture (CTR stock, MOE handguard and vert grip)
9x TM 68rd Mids
Madbull Ultimate Hopup
Madbull Black 6.01mm Tightbore 455mm
Gemtech Blackslide barrel extension
G&P Stoner Rifle Body
4x32 Scope

Not much to look at, but I love it.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: theFlyingTrumpet on March 04, 2012, 08:51:31 PM
(http://i866.photobucket.com/albums/ab226/uwanaugoda/P1010086.jpg?t=1282615713)

Is that a Benchmade 42?
How much do you want?
How often do you get asked this?
I definitely don't have the money it's worth.... But I'm totally jelly.
 ;D
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: XavierMace on March 20, 2012, 09:18:06 AM
The USP is real, but I will most likely get an airsoft one.

Wow, I've never seen a USP with color trades before....
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: DMAN007 on April 16, 2012, 10:59:58 PM
(https://cache.nebula.phx3.secureserver.net/obj/NkVGQjRFRTZENjA1RTI4RTI5QUQ6M2E5MTYxYjdmZWU1NWZkNDY0Zjg0NjIyOGMxODg4MDg=?u=8618bae2-63e8-4302-b91f-a048e4aa7a96)
(https://cache.nebula.phx3.secureserver.net/obj/NkVGQjRFRTZENjA1RTI4RTI5QUQ6NDRlYWIwMDA5NzFkZDM1N2JmYzA4ZDE3MjQyZTQ0ODg=?u=e6524b2f-ee21-448b-9047-1ab19e2b9c32)
(https://cache.nebula.phx3.secureserver.net/obj/NkVGQjRFRTZENjA1RTI4RTI5QUQ6OTNhOWQyNDZmZDgyYzc0YjU3NjFhNzkwZTRjNjZlZTU=?u=0de8e0fc-44c2-4e72-8610-ef2a5c5ab0f5)
(https://cache.nebula.phx3.secureserver.net/obj/NkVGQjRFRTZENjA1RTI4RTI5QUQ6M2IyNDM4OGExMmZlYWUzNjNjY2I5Zjk5YmQxMDBhNTQ=?u=133cf27d-1086-492f-aea5-9b694febb211)

KWA USP Compact (NS2) with Shooter Design Slide/Barrel and Trijicon Night Sights.  Just waiting for my KM tightbore and Streamlight rail adapter to come in and it will be set.
What holster do you plan on using with the flashlight? Assuming you are getting a rail adapter for a flashlight.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: XavierMace on April 17, 2012, 05:44:19 PM
Probably will just have one made.  The rail adapter has turned out to be a bigger issue than I thought it would be.  The airsoft USPc ones are always out of stock and the GG&G USPc rail is slightly too large for the KWA USPc.  Works perfectly on the KWA USP Tactical though.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: spazz on April 29, 2012, 01:54:12 PM
And now for something completely different!
(http://i750.photobucket.com/albums/xx145/Exarach/0427121814a.jpg)
I aim to misbehave.....

great back up primarys for vangaurd right there.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Exarach on April 29, 2012, 02:20:49 PM
And now for something completely different!
(http://i750.photobucket.com/albums/xx145/Exarach/0427121814a.jpg)
I aim to misbehave.....

NAH :)

I have a bunch of Madbull C02 shells and various rockets/projectiles for them. Its anti-vehicle for LC this year.. and mortars after..

great back up primarys for vangaurd right there.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Sykinder on June 28, 2012, 07:42:57 PM
My Masada that's broken but I decided to paint it.
(http://i581.photobucket.com/albums/ss254/Sykinder/P1000588.jpg)
(http://i581.photobucket.com/albums/ss254/Sykinder/P1000589.jpg)

holy shit yes.

(http://i.imgur.com/ebwgt.gif)

Thanks!

I really want to know how that was done, I'm getting ideas.

I just used krylon and a normal kitchen sponge, but you can use pretty much any sponge.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Fresnel on June 28, 2012, 07:46:28 PM
I really want to know how that was done, I'm getting ideas.

I just used krylon and a normal kitchen sponge, but you can use pretty much any sponge.
So you just spray the sponge and dab it on? I'm seeing a great possibility here with maybe a tan base layer and  brown splotches.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Sykinder on June 28, 2012, 09:05:33 PM
Yeah, just make sure it's not on the sponge too thick or else its just a big blob, but you can just press it on something else to get rid of some of the paint. It adds texture too! I think tan and brown will work good for desert areas.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Fresnel on June 28, 2012, 10:00:17 PM
Yeah, just make sure it's not on the sponge too thick or else its just a big blob, but you can just press it on something else to get rid of some of the paint. It adds texture too! I think tan and brown will work good for desert areas.
I like it. Thanks for the idea! :D
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Nova on June 30, 2012, 02:34:07 PM
Great paint job on the Masada. One of the best I've seen in a while.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: xTanTricK on July 05, 2012, 08:18:04 PM

(http://i1222.photobucket.com/albums/dd497/xtantrick/DSC_0004-3.jpg)

(http://i1222.photobucket.com/albums/dd497/xtantrick/DSC_0005-3.jpg)

o my jesus you have 2 trx rails i just picked up an m16 that im going to throw the 13 trx on
[/quote]

Yes I do and I absolutely love those rails. I'm thinking about getting a real Troy rail for an AR build in the near future.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Fresnel on July 05, 2012, 09:06:08 PM
Yes I do and I absolutely love those rails. I'm thinking about getting a real Troy rail for an AR build in the near future.
I almost did that, and then I discovered that they don't make a 12" rail for some reason. They make a 13", which covers half the gas block on a rifle-length gas system and doesn't allow you to use a gas block front sight, and an 11", which has a huge gap behind the gas block and doesn't allow a bipod to be mounted as far forward as I'd like. Ended up going with a Midwest Industries SS-12, which looks very similar.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: xTanTricK on July 05, 2012, 10:01:43 PM
Yes I do and I absolutely love those rails. I'm thinking about getting a real Troy rail for an AR build in the near future.
I almost did that, and then I discovered that they don't make a 12" rail for some reason. They make a 13", which covers half the gas block on a rifle-length gas system and doesn't allow you to use a gas block front sight, and an 11", which has a huge gap behind the gas block and doesn't allow a bipod to be mounted as far forward as I'd like. Ended up going with a Midwest Industries SS-12, which looks very similar.

Yea I would assume the rails looked similiar to the Madbull rails and were relatively the same size. I'm planning on building something similiar to the G&G m16 above.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Fresnel on July 06, 2012, 02:55:06 AM
Yes I do and I absolutely love those rails. I'm thinking about getting a real Troy rail for an AR build in the near future.
I almost did that, and then I discovered that they don't make a 12" rail for some reason. They make a 13", which covers half the gas block on a rifle-length gas system and doesn't allow you to use a gas block front sight, and an 11", which has a huge gap behind the gas block and doesn't allow a bipod to be mounted as far forward as I'd like. Ended up going with a Midwest Industries SS-12, which looks very similar.

Yea I would assume the rails looked similiar to the Madbull rails and were relatively the same size. I'm planning on building something similiar to the G&G m16 above.
Well, that assumes that the gas block on an airsoft gun has to go in any specific place. My two cents? If you're spending the money to free-float your barrel with something like a TRX rail, you want your front sight attached to the barrel, not the rail. The point of a free-floated rail is to remove the inherent flexing of the handguard from the equation when lining up your sights, but if you put the sight ON the rail, you've re-introduced it again and largely negated the benefit of a free-floated gun. So it's for this reason that I wonder why they made a rail that cannot be properly used on any length gas system with a front sight gas block, unless you're mounting a low-pro gas block on a rifle-length system, and a second front sight/gas block combo near the muzzle, like a dissipator upper. I've only seen that done once before, and it was on a riced-out match AR. Looked kinda ugly, too.

Also, you might want to do a bit of research on the modular rail system. When researching whether it'd work on a rifle-length gas system, I saw a couple people complaining about the rails being extremely difficult to mount without removing the entire handguard, which may or may not also require you to remove the gas block and flash hider. Some people might be okay with that, but I don't know if I'm one of them.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Dayton on July 10, 2012, 10:03:40 PM
(Click for Larger View)
My Polar Star Build is near completion. I tested it out at the Fightertown Fund Raiser Night Game. Worked Great!

I spent several months slowly building this rifle. Countless hours designing the custom parts. Had to do a fair amount of modification to the receiver to make everything fit and run my wires to the buffer tube. I think it all paid off though.

Madbull JP Industries Receiver
Madbull JP Industries 9.8" Handguard w/ Barrel
Madbull JP Industries Upper x 2
Madbull Novesker CQB Outer Barrel
Madbull Daniel Defense 7" RIS
Magpull PTS Ergo F93 Buttstock
Magpull PTS AFG2
Polarstar Fusion Engine
Redline Grip Connect
9" Foam Filled Silencer (bought from Redwolf quite some time ago)


The FCU and Battery fit in the Buffer Tube: (http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v314/DytHlt/th_CIMG0954.jpg) (http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v314/DytHlt/CIMG0954.jpg)(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v314/DytHlt/th_CIMG0955.jpg) (http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v314/DytHlt/CIMG0955.jpg)
Custom Built Buffer Tube Cap (http://www.shapeways.com/model/616672) (Original needs a screwdriver or coin to install/remove): (http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v314/DytHlt/th_CIMG0939.jpg) (http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v314/DytHlt/CIMG0939.jpg)
Custom Built Continuous Upper Rail (http://www.shapeways.com/model/566589): (http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v314/DytHlt/th_CIMG0950.jpg) (http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v314/DytHlt/CIMG0950.jpg)
Custom Built Buttstock Spacer (http://www.shapeways.com/model/568543) (to create smooth transition between body and buttstock): (http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v314/DytHlt/th_CIMG0945.jpg) (http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v314/DytHlt/CIMG0945.jpg)
1/8" 90 Swivel Fitting (http://www.amazon.com/Extreme-Rage-Stainless-Swivel-Red/dp/B00302JOPM) runs hose parallel to receiver, and allows hose to swing left and right. Keeps hose from kinking or getting in the way when laying gun on Bipod: (http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v314/DytHlt/th_CIMG0953.jpg) (http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v314/DytHlt/CIMG0953.jpg)
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v314/DytHlt/th_CIMG0946.jpg) (http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v314/DytHlt/CIMG0946.jpg)(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v314/DytHlt/th_CIMG0953.jpg) (http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v314/DytHlt/CIMG0953.jpg)(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v314/DytHlt/th_CIMG0947.jpg) (http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v314/DytHlt/CIMG0947.jpg)

2 Uppers, same lower.    /\ AK length Barrel       \/ M4 Length Barrel

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v314/DytHlt/th_CIMG0942.jpg) (http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v314/DytHlt/CIMG0942.jpg)(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v314/DytHlt/th_CIMG0943.jpg) (http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v314/DytHlt/CIMG0943.jpg)


I still need to do a little bit of work to the insides of both Uppers to allow the imitation bolt to slide smoothly. Apparently Madbull felt that a "bolt" was not necessary with this upper, seeing as how the charging handle does not even have the required catches to grab the "bolt".
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Raith on August 01, 2012, 10:58:49 PM
Can anybody tell me what the pen (or shotgun shell, or .50 BMG round, or whatever) through the trigger guard to take a photo of a pistol does?  I've taken plenty of photos of pistols and never felt like I needed to put something through the trigger guard.  It seems like something people do because they've seen other people do it without knowing why they do it.  (Like revving your engine before turning it off)

EDIT - No offense intended to Note, I was just reminded by seeing your photo.  That seems like a great deal on a gun that is reasonably hard to find.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: Note on August 01, 2012, 11:06:10 PM
Can anybody tell me what the pen (or shotgun shell, or .50 BMG round, or whatever) through the trigger guard to take a photo of a pistol does?  I've taken plenty of photos of pistols and never felt like I needed to put something through the trigger guard.  It seems like something people do because they've seen other people do it without knowing why they do it.  (Like revving your engine before turning it off)

EDIT - No offense intended to Note, I was just reminded by seeing your photo.  That seems like a great deal on a gun that is reasonably hard to find.

None taken. I see what you're saying, the only reason I do it is because I like the angle and I can never get the gun to stand up on its own.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: XavierMace on August 12, 2012, 11:13:20 AM
a matrix torch that is better than my friends surefire

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha.

Thanks, I needed a good laugh.
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: SgtCulotta on August 12, 2012, 11:15:42 AM
Can anybody tell me what the pen (or shotgun shell, or .50 BMG round, or whatever) through the trigger guard to take a photo of a pistol does?  I've taken plenty of photos of pistols and never felt like I needed to put something through the trigger guard.  It seems like something people do because they've seen other people do it without knowing why they do it.  (Like revving your engine before turning it off)

EDIT - No offense intended to Note, I was just reminded by seeing your photo.  That seems like a great deal on a gun that is reasonably hard to find.

None taken. I see what you're saying, the only reason I do it is because I like the angle and I can never get the gun to stand up on its own.

Most of the time a round is used just for aesthetics, it's simply angles for photographers. Most use clear plastic though. Then you have the Pro's that use Perm Markers!
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: asof elites on August 12, 2012, 11:16:02 AM
Any time Mace
Title: Re: Weapon Photos Discussion
Post by: spazz on February 08, 2013, 09:41:19 PM
There are many of us who were friends with Ron, and remember as far back as the Game on, and then Jungletoy days.
Occasionally he would drag out this ratty box, and say ,"You know, I'm gonna build this CAR for the next game."
Invariably, the box would disappear, and we wouldn't see the CAR-15. Later on it changed boxes, but still did not seem to end up as a complete gun.
Well I ended up with it, and I finished it.

I present Ron's (Nil8r) Marui CAR-15.
(http://i9.photobucket.com/albums/a85/PaulDWog/CAR15_1_zps59eb004a.jpg)

(http://i9.photobucket.com/albums/a85/PaulDWog/CAR15_2_zps06facf09.jpg)

I will post better pics soon.

As I was sitting on my back patio last night with the CAR in one hand and a DAMN fine cigar in the other, I couldn't help but realize how much I miss my friend............

im right here with you paul. I think of him every time I play around with the prime lr300 that I got right before he passed and I fondle it at least once a day. its good to see that that car finaly got built. it looks good. I finaly build a short gun for myself. I think I get pics posted up here somewhere
Title: Latest Polarstar Builds ready for Op Greenhorn
Post by: Drmalan on April 24, 2013, 03:23:19 PM
Magpul Hurricane Shrike: Orga 6.23 Barrel with Prowin Hop-up, Prometheus soft bucking, Fire Fly flat hop nub
                                       Motor added to box mag and controlled by FCU
                                       Atacs Dip

Magpul/Vltor JP Custom: Orga 6.23 Barrel with Prowin Hop-up, Prometheus soft bucking, Fire Fly flat hop nub
                                      Atacs Dip

(http://img845.imageshack.us/img845/7325/wp20130424004.jpg) (http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/845/wp20130424004.jpg/)

Uploaded with ImageShack.us (http://imageshack.us)