<blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote">you got that right bro.
My dad got me this "21 days to Bagdad" book which basicly had some news articles and pics about every major action in that campain. I read about one that an Armerican Army unit (i think it was one of the 101st platoons) and tehy got into a city (again i forgot which one) but at one point they were in their building and the Iraqis where in one across the street. they were shooting RPG's at our guys and every once in awhile the little pricks droped one. when there was about 3 of these things on the ground they sent a boy, estimated to be about 10, to get them. the americans yelled at him not to do it, but...he did and the reporter on the scene said it was like the kid was hit by a wall of bullets.
The point im trying to make is even the kids could help their war effort. the kid wasn't armed but was still a threat. he also wasn't being used as a human sheild.<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
I'm not saying all children are automatically innocent, and can't do any harm (if that statement was directed at me [
]) I was just saying I think Firehead was going a little overboard.