Author Topic:  (Read 4227 times)

Offline Harley

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Major General
  • *****
  • Posts: 2254
    • View Profile
(No subject)
« on: August 04, 2002, 12:30:14 PM »
Hey Vell correct me if I'm wrong.  Isn't expanding ammo forbidden due to the Geneva Convention?  I agree that expanding ammo would probably be better suited against some apponents versus Ball ammo.

"When I go home and people ask me why I do it, I don't say anything, they wouldn't understand.... it's about the men around you."
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by Harley »
\"Just because you\'re paranoid, doesn\'t mean they\'re not out to get you!\"

\"Have Gun - Will Travel\"

Offline TheCrow

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sergeant
  • *****
  • Posts: 170
    • View Profile
(No subject)
« Reply #1 on: August 04, 2002, 06:36:46 PM »
Yes Harley, it is against the rules <img src=icon_smile_wink.gif border=0 align=middle>.  But our troops, not the rule makers, are the ones out there risking their lives (sorry, I guess I am preaching to the converted).

I find it interesting that some guns we think are real cool, are actually pieces of crap (or close) when the chips are down.

Hearing about the desire for M203 buckshot loads makes me want an M79 with a vest full of grenades!

-The Crow


"Fear is for the enemy.  Fear and bullets."
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by TheCrow »

Team ORION Squad Leader


Offline KenCasper

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sergeant
  • *****
  • Posts: 196
    • View Profile
(No subject)
« Reply #2 on: August 04, 2002, 06:37:02 PM »
<BLOCKQUOTE id=quote><font size=1 face="Verdana" id=quote>quote:<hr height=1 noshade id=quote> Hey Vell correct me if I'm wrong. Isn't expanding ammo forbidden due to the Geneva Convention? I agree that expanding ammo would probably be better suited against some apponents versus Ball ammo.<hr height=1 noshade id=quote></BLOCKQUOTE id=quote></font id=quote><font face="Verdana" size=2 id=quote>

 You are correct The "FMJ" or Full Metal Jacketed round was  made standard issue by the Geneva convention. Also out lawed or banned were Shotguns, "dum dum rounds", and .50 BMG use agains troops. The Geneva Convention was suppost to "Civialize" War. Is that really posible???

<img src="http://www.stopstart.fsnet.co.uk/mica/protect.gif" border=0>On the Eigth Day God creatated the Infantry, And the Gates of Hell opened and the Devil Snapped to  Attention!!!!
<img src="http://www.stopstart.fsnet.co.uk/flags/usa.gif" border=0>
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by KenCasper »
Sgt Kevin Widner
AKA \"Casper\"

\"The Harder you train the harder your enemy must train...all comes down to who gives up first!   Mike \"Colonel\" Potter

Offline TheCrow

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sergeant
  • *****
  • Posts: 170
    • View Profile
(No subject)
« Reply #3 on: August 04, 2002, 06:41:22 PM »
KC:

Shotguns, with buckshot, are still legal.  The pointman of a SEAL squad usually carries one.

Also, to add to the expanding round info, our special ops guys do use hollow-point .45 rounds in the SOCOM pistol for sentry removal.

-The Crow


"Fear is for the enemy.  Fear and bullets."
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by TheCrow »

Team ORION Squad Leader


Offline RangerSparky

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Private
  • **
  • Posts: 14
    • View Profile
(No subject)
« Reply #4 on: August 04, 2002, 07:49:20 PM »
tthe way my recruiter explains the relation of .50 cal and the Geniva is: "the Geniva convention regulates .50 cal for use agains equipment only. Thus, when questions, you were shooting at the enemy's gun, knife, or weapon, not him... the high penetration happened to pass through the equipment and into him." He also explained a technicallity that clothing is equipment. <img src=icon_smile_evil.gif border=0 align=middle>

"When in doubt, Empty the Magazine." Don't use a cannon to kill a mosquito?! WHY NOT??!?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by RangerSparky »
\"When in doubt, Empty the Magazine.\" Don\'t use a cannon to kill a mosquito?! WHY NOT??!?

Offline Paco

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Brigadier General
  • *****
  • Posts: 1507
    • View Profile
(No subject)
« Reply #5 on: August 04, 2002, 08:56:08 PM »
FYI, here's a copy of the Geneva Convention:

http://www.unhchr.ch/html/menu3/b/91.htm
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by Paco »

Offline Wolf

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sergeant
  • *****
  • Posts: 182
    • View Profile
(No subject)
« Reply #6 on: August 04, 2002, 09:02:23 PM »
Sounds like everbody using the .50 BMG round out there are finding loopholes so they can shoot at personnel with them. They can't really prove you were actaully aiming for the person himself. "But sir, we were just shooting at his equipment<img src=icon_smile_wink.gif border=0 align=middle>"

Now what was that you were saying?...<img src="http://www.stopstart.fsnet.co.uk/smilie/tank.gif" border=0><img src="http://www.stopstart.fsnet.co.uk/smilie/2M16.gif" border=0>
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by Wolf »
Cover your six

Offline Legs

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • First Sergeant
  • *****
  • Posts: 496
    • View Profile
(No subject)
« Reply #7 on: August 04, 2002, 11:43:26 PM »
The best point you made, Vell, is that too often guns are sought after or bought based on the cool factor...and they fall short.  I'd love a SAW, but they simply don't rate even what the "old" M60 does for reliability among soldiers I've known.  Glocks, M16 series guns, and frankly most 1911s ALL have severe jamming issues, but continue to sell in tidal waves because they are popular in movies, TV, and in military history.  With work a 1911 is hard to beat, but out of the box very guns are truly "reliable."  Avondale PD just dumped all of their Glocks for Sig P220s.  Only took them 10 years to get smart!
Now if we could just get our military to dump the M16s...

Good to hear from you Vell.  Keep it coming, pal!!

"You are, what you do, when it counts."
-The Masao

"Get on that fifty!  Someone get on that fifty!"
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by Legs »
Molon labe
\"Zippo first.\"

Offline Harley

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Major General
  • *****
  • Posts: 2254
    • View Profile
(No subject)
« Reply #8 on: August 05, 2002, 09:08:25 AM »
Paco, that was only relating to the treatment of prisoners, not the actual rules of warfare pertaining to use of ammunition.  I'm sure there are volumes and volumes of aritcles on their web site.  I took a quick look and got lost.

"When I go home and people ask me why I do it, I don't say anything, they wouldn't understand.... it's about the men around you."

Edited by - harley on 08/05/2002  09:08:56 AM
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by Harley »
\"Just because you\'re paranoid, doesn\'t mean they\'re not out to get you!\"

\"Have Gun - Will Travel\"

Offline TheCrow

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sergeant
  • *****
  • Posts: 170
    • View Profile
(No subject)
« Reply #9 on: August 05, 2002, 10:20:02 AM »
Kyle, since when do Glocks jam a lot?  I've never heard that.  I have owned 3 different ones, and they had zero problems.  In fact, the only factory, out of the box gun to jam on me was a Sig P220 in .45ACP.  I guess it shows that anything man-made can have its flaws.

For the discussion on the .50 cal, that is why the sniper rifles are referred to as "anti-materiel" rifles.  

"But sir, I WAS shooting at his vehicle.  I can't help that it went through his armor, the building, a tree outside..."

-The Crow




"Fear is for the enemy.  Fear and bullets."
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by TheCrow »

Team ORION Squad Leader


Offline Cyphen

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Private First Class
  • ***
  • Posts: 46
    • View Profile
(No subject)
« Reply #10 on: August 05, 2002, 02:47:32 PM »
Actually, from I've read, the US never signed the thing for the Geneva Convention, they only semi-agreed to abide by its rules. Which means, if we wanted to have better armament for soldiers (and maybe politically piss some foreigners off), we <b>could</b> issue it, but the US military doesn't want to start losing friendships. However, we still wouldn't be breaking any international law.

--Cyphen
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by Cyphen »
--Cyphen

\"I should really stop saying things that make me sound like an ass.\" --Me

Offline Legs

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • First Sergeant
  • *****
  • Posts: 496
    • View Profile
(No subject)
« Reply #11 on: August 05, 2002, 04:23:09 PM »
The Glock issue isn't "the Gospel according to Kyle", I assure you all.  It is a known problem and though there are hundreds of owners who have never had a problem, there are tens of thousands of Glocks out there.  I used to ship an average of 8 Glocks per week back to the factory in Georgia for repairs, and whenever there was a call for assistance on the range it was usually trouble with a jammed Glock.  Their inherent weaknesses include, but are not limited to, the internal striker system and their magazines.  You may never have a problem with yours, and like you said...you somehow managed to get a Sig to jam (as most guns out of the box are mechanical problems waiting to happen), but by and large, the Glock is not a comfortable choice for self defense.  Most law enforcement agencies bought it for the same reason that the Military went with the Beretta over the Sig...PRICE.  Glock undercut everyone in a brilliant marketing strategy that made them rich, but it supplied agencies with years of problems.  At the range, I lost count of how many defective magazines we returned to Glock and how many cracked slides we came across.  I am talking in the realm of hundreds of guns over the space of 18 months, so it isn't my opinion alone.  These things are known to many people but not often published.  
The story is the same with the M16s since the day they were introduced, but we still use them, too.  It isn't quality, but price that dictates such things.
By the way, I am not just a Glock hater!  I have owned and extensively fired almost 100 handguns, plus more if you count those I have fired but not actually owned.  Of ALL of them, the only guns to never once give me any trouble were a Sig P220 in .45, a Browning Hi Power in 9mm, and an HK P7M8.  Everything else, in some form or another, came up shallow.  Ironically, I don't own any of the three presently.  Always on the lookout for the "perfect" handgun.
In the end, if I am going to place my life and the lives of others in the hands of firearms engineers, I am going to be extremely picky.  As a part of a larger collection I have no quarrels with the Glock.  They can be fun to shoot.  But I do not recommend them for home defense, defensive carry, or as a primary weapon for any purpose other than plinking.  
Sorry for the novel, but handguns are something of a passion for me, and I spend (and have spent) thousands of dollars and countless hours in study and hands on experimenting, as well as work related experience to gain my knowledge.
One day we'll dive into submachine guns...my second passion.  No time or room for that here!


"You are, what you do, when it counts."
-The Masao

"Get on that fifty!  Someone get on that fifty!"
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by Legs »
Molon labe
\"Zippo first.\"

Offline TheCrow

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sergeant
  • *****
  • Posts: 170
    • View Profile
(No subject)
« Reply #12 on: August 05, 2002, 06:36:58 PM »
Kyle, I'm not disputing your experience.  I too have owned and fired a literal armory full of guns.  I used to be a gun dealer (early 90's), and never came across a bad Glock.  If Glock's quality has gone down, I am not aware of it.  I still stand behind the brand.

Back to the original topic, this does relate to everyone's opinions about the different airsoft guns and makers.  Everyone has their own experiences, but they are all different.  A gun I give a high confidence rating to could be someone else's worst nightmare.  Maybe we should create our own "Confidence Rating" chart to give other people something to look at.  But of course, you can only give your vote to a gun you have owned or used extensively.

-The Crow



"Fear is for the enemy.  Fear and bullets."
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by TheCrow »

Team ORION Squad Leader


Offline Wolf

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sergeant
  • *****
  • Posts: 182
    • View Profile
(No subject)
« Reply #13 on: August 05, 2002, 09:43:14 PM »
The Glock debate is a very strange thing. I have heard people say that Glocks jam all the time, and it is hard to get them to work right. I have also heard people say that you could pour sand or dirt through a Glock and it would still fire. So do Glocks jam all the time, or work perfectly? The world may never know...<img src=icon_smile_tongue.gif border=0 align=middle>

Now what was that you were saying?...<img src="http://www.stopstart.fsnet.co.uk/smilie/tank.gif" border=0><img src="http://www.stopstart.fsnet.co.uk/smilie/2M16.gif" border=0>
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by Wolf »
Cover your six

Offline Legs

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • First Sergeant
  • *****
  • Posts: 496
    • View Profile
(No subject)
« Reply #14 on: August 12, 2002, 11:06:24 PM »
Wolf-
There is no such animal as a gun that never malfunctions.  Glocks do have feed problems, Sigs suffer from weak decocker springs, and 1911s have a history of eI also took very good care of it.

The US issue 9mm bullet is the 115gr FMJ.

<hr height=1 noshade id=quote></BLOCKQUOTE id=quote></font id=quote><font face="Verdana" size=2 id=quote>

 I think you hit the nail on the head about MOST dislikes about weapons in the field, if you don't care for your baby (read weapon), she won't take care of you.  And Harley hit the other, most of the weapons once they pass the introduction tests have standards lowered to allow for cheaper manufacture and thus require the average grunt (and yes I've had to earn the title so I can use it) to play mister QC and find the faults (at least in their eyes) and then sweet talk the armorer into fixing / upgrading it.

 And that is why I have taken the Amry coraspondance corse "small arms repair".... well that and I am a GUM NUT (jokin, I'm not a nut I'm just cooko for cooco puffs!) Thus I enjoy reading about weapons even dull monolog army TM's, hince my intrest in Airsoft.  

 Now I can say for a fact that many guys I know take "pookie bait" with them to the field to help make MRE's taste better, or supplement MRE's. And other (like me) bring gear to make life easier, ie my lovely wal-mart cot and chairs (the ones that just pop up!), my tac sling for AR's /M-16's, And my quick detachable scope.
   Now if I was heading over to Affganistan I'd be sure to leave the wally world cot and chairs.... maybe, But the tac sling and scope will most deff go with me, plus my personal gun cleaning kit, which includes everything needed for cleaning quickly and thrroghly, plus small mods (ie trigger work, and minor repairs). But maybe that is because I'm a "Guard" soldier that has had the Hoooah level dropped some and want every advantage to make it home.

<img src="http://www.stopstart.fsnet.co.uk/mica/protect.gif" border=0>On the Eigth Day God creatated the Infantry, And the Gates of Hell opened and the Devil Snapped to  Attention!!!!
<img src="http://www.stopstart.fsnet.co.uk/flags/usa.gif" border=0>
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by Legs »
Molon labe
\"Zippo first.\"