39
« on: September 12, 2005, 09:54:44 PM »
i agree, lets see the xm8 put up a good 60 years of service before we say its better than the trusty ak-47. we cant afford forget the blunder our own airforce made in the early 60's with rushing the m16 into service. it may look cool and futuristic, but looks truly can be decieving. im glad the army's taking its time in testing , we've no need to rush a new toy then see the casualties pile up as the weapon's malfunctions come out of the woodwork. (case in point m16).
i'll take my weapon pre field proven, and if that means settling with iron and wood, im down.[/quote]
Im bored, so Ill bite.
Have you ever used an AK in the field? If not, then you are just going by what you have read about them. I HAVE used an M4, M16, and AK in force on force and range enviroments. The BS about the AK being the king of reliablity is just that, BS. It will shoot crappier ammo, and is a bit more lenient on how often you have to clean it, but they DO FAIL. This summer alone I went through 3 different AKs that just kept failing on me. I ended up with a well beat up M4 that NEVER had a problem. If you ever did use an AK you would be familiar with their crappy sights, less than ideal accuracy, and horrible safety design.
The negatives:
1. The safety doesnt permit the gun to be carried on safe on a patrol and then switched to fire immediately on contact. This summer a SF candidate was removed from the course with only 3 days to go before graduation because of an accidental discharge he had with his AK. After that point those with AKs were forced to carry them on fire but without a round in the chamber and then chamber a round upon contact. Less than ideal. The M16 is far superior.
2. The whole "knock down" power crap. The gun has crappy sights, crappy egronomics, and the accuracy isnt up to par. Which leaves you with a heavier bullet missing the target. It doesnt matter how much lead you throw at a target, if you cant get reliable hits, the weapon is useless. The M16 is far superior.
3. Have you ever put more than a few rounds down the barrel of an AK with the wood grips? After only a few rounds (less than 100) the foregrip became so hot so as I was unable to hold it securely and get hits. Once again, a rifle that you cannot get hits with its USELESS. I was able to fire a M16A2 until the front part of the handgaurds melted (in excess of 200 rounds in rapid sucession) and I was able to place all the rounds on my intended target.
Until you use the weapon in a real enviroment, you can only go on hearsay on how they perform. The weapon our troops are being issued today is truly one of the best rifles around. (Then theres the whole HK416 and Sig 552...but yeah...)
Rick