"And what pray tell does you discussing it mean?", is what I was getting at. Reading a blip off the net dosent give you all of the points of vew or all the facts to make a judgement on the conduct of this officer.
You were not preasent at those events, you are not a law enfocement professional, you dont even go to UCLA, your statement is either intended to pick a fight with someone on the net or you intended your post to be meaningless. I was pointing out, that that info presents nothign new to either side of an argument (of which there is none), and the outcome of such a discussion yeilds nothing beneficial or harmful, it involves people you dont know, in a place you arent in, with circumstances you dont understand, the outcome of which won't affect you. So quit beating a dead horse and picking fights on line.
We all agree tasers are good for both cop and robber, and a question of appropriate use depends on so many factors that a third party getting info from the internet has no right to judge or rule on the matter. It is obvious that your of the opinion that that guy shouldnt be a cop, fine... thanks for sharing, so what...
