Author Topic: CP Armor Chassis Gen 2  (Read 2501 times)

Offline HavHav

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Colonel
  • *****
  • Posts: 1474
    • View Profile
CP Armor Chassis Gen 2
« on: February 04, 2009, 10:01:00 PM »


Does anyone own one? Used to own one? Input?

It looked fairly decent to me... Thanks.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline I Slap Fat Kids

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Major
  • *****
  • Posts: 1026
    • View Profile
Re: CP Armor Chassis Gen 2
« Reply #1 on: February 05, 2009, 06:26:30 AM »
My friend has one. Its actually pretty nice.  It's nicer than any Condor gear (at least any I've seen).  It feels like it won't have any problems for awhile, and it can adjust to fit a pretty small person.  The padding inside is movable so you can put it where you need it.  It is a little darker than Condor tan.
I'd say it's worth the cash.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by Guest »
Replicas:

TM P90 red dot
SRC G36K with a CA AG-36
JG G36C
TM Hi-Capa M.R.P.
KJW MK II
WE HK 416
WE Hi-Capa Dragon
And a few friends\':

Offline Ganef

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Major General
  • *****
  • Posts: 2103
    • View Profile
    • http://www.coyotetactical.blogspot.com/
Re: CP Armor Chassis Gen 2
« Reply #2 on: February 05, 2009, 07:50:42 AM »
I have two copies at the gearbox. I used one for OP red dagger. The ventalation was apparent and the fit and function of it was nice. The problem with it is the pals area, with the separated plate pocket there is a big divide when you are placing pouches across the front. I know the CP chassis also come with a cummerbund but that goes on over the top of the thing making it rather bulky before you even have pouches on it. I like the idea of the side to side mounting of the armor.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by Guest »
"Well, ain\'t we a pair, Raggedy Man..."

Offline Seedy

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sergeant
  • *****
  • Posts: 175
    • View Profile
    • http://www.deserthawks.org
Re: CP Armor Chassis Gen 2
« Reply #3 on: February 06, 2009, 11:11:35 AM »
looks pretty neat.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by Guest »