Author Topic: Walther P99 .40SW and concealed carry?  (Read 12747 times)

Offline Kilo11

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Staff Sergeant
  • *****
  • Posts: 208
    • View Profile
    • http://www.myspace.com/Darklighterstheory
(No subject)
« Reply #15 on: June 26, 2007, 05:34:35 PM »
Quote from: "LaserRacer"
Wow...Gotta say I didn't see that coming.



I had't even heard of the S&W M&P 40 I guess that is another one to look into.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smith_%26_ ... tomatic%29

Wikipidia is your friend :)
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by Kilo11 »
Quote from: \"Pheonix 797\"

Anywho, good luck and remember Airsoft is about safety and integrity. If you make us look bad we hunt you  \":lol:\"

 1st Squad, Marines, Allied Forces, Op Bulldog II

Offline XavierMace

  • Site Admin
  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (+16)
  • Major General
  • *****
  • Posts: 2906
    • View Profile
    • http://www.xaviermace.com
(No subject)
« Reply #16 on: June 26, 2007, 06:34:42 PM »
All in all, it's not a bad gun for the price.  Definitely worth checking out anyways.  I would go with the .40 3.5" version if it was me.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by XavierMace »

Offline Speedy

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sergeant
  • *****
  • Posts: 170
    • View Profile
ok
« Reply #17 on: June 26, 2007, 06:51:20 PM »
S&W .38 hammer less. Works great and i dont complain.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by Speedy »
Check out Albuquerque, New Mexico\'s first indoor Airsoft Arena here http://abqairsoft.com/index.html

Offline Brando

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Master Sergeant
  • *****
  • Posts: 438
    • View Profile
(No subject)
« Reply #18 on: June 26, 2007, 09:27:23 PM »
I was a huge glock fan but i converted to the XD's better balance and a heavier slide. Pretty much i just have better groupings with my 4in XD .45 then my glock 22
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by Brando »
To many guns to fit in here

Offline azstang66

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sergeant
  • *****
  • Posts: 103
    • View Profile
(No subject)
« Reply #19 on: June 26, 2007, 09:31:42 PM »
Walther PPK/s .380 auto

Super light, small, concealable, and Bond looking!
I have it "in the pants", and wear fitting t-shirts etc. and people are surprised if I tell them I'm carrying.
Even though .380 isn't as powerful as 9mm, when you get hit with any bullet, you tend to either turn and run, bleed, or cover your ringing ears.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by azstang66 »

Offline Kilo11

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Staff Sergeant
  • *****
  • Posts: 208
    • View Profile
    • http://www.myspace.com/Darklighterstheory
(No subject)
« Reply #20 on: June 26, 2007, 10:16:07 PM »
I have a friend who has a KelTec .380 i cant recall the name however is small enough to fit into your palm and can be hidden just at anywhere, pretty cool gun. ill see if i cant find the name.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by Kilo11 »
Quote from: \"Pheonix 797\"

Anywho, good luck and remember Airsoft is about safety and integrity. If you make us look bad we hunt you  \":lol:\"

 1st Squad, Marines, Allied Forces, Op Bulldog II

Offline Vince

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • General
  • *****
  • Posts: 5230
    • View Profile
(No subject)
« Reply #21 on: June 26, 2007, 10:28:21 PM »
Quote from: "Kilo11"
I have a friend who has a KelTec .380 i cant recall the name however is small enough to fit into your palm and can be hidden just at anywhere, pretty cool gun. ill see if i cant find the name.


P3AT
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by Vince »


"I was having dinner with Andrew Ho, and he said I should have COL McKnight lead airsofters in mock combat. I said, "That is the gayest idea I have ever heard." - John Lu

Offline Brando

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Master Sergeant
  • *****
  • Posts: 438
    • View Profile
(No subject)
« Reply #22 on: June 26, 2007, 11:34:57 PM »
i have seen several kel-tecs with jamming problems.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by Brando »
To many guns to fit in here

Offline Doc Hollywood

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Brigadier General
  • *****
  • Posts: 1564
    • View Profile
(No subject)
« Reply #23 on: June 26, 2007, 11:55:13 PM »
Quote from: "Brando"
I was a huge glock fan but i converted to the XD's better balance and a heavier slide. Pretty much i just have better groupings with my 4in XD .45 then my glock 22


Thats because you are 8 1/2 feet tall and have meathook hands bro....


 8)
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by Doc Hollywood »

Offline Brando

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Master Sergeant
  • *****
  • Posts: 438
    • View Profile
(No subject)
« Reply #24 on: June 27, 2007, 12:03:56 AM »
that could be the reason. plus with 13+1 of .45 you cant go wrong
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by Brando »
To many guns to fit in here

Offline IcePlatinumSky

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Colonel
  • *****
  • Posts: 1425
    • View Profile
(No subject)
« Reply #25 on: June 27, 2007, 12:46:49 AM »
You said "For years I wanted a 1911, but after much thought I decided that I wanted a double action for carry purposes. At this point the idea of having one in the pipe and the hammer back seems like a dangerous one"

Look if that is your reason don’t buy a Glock. They have no lever safety. They have what is called a safe action trigger, but it’s no longer safe once you touch the trigger /trigger plunger. Not that you should be touching it anyway if you are not intent on destroying your target. I like the glock for many reasons, but I find 1911 is the way to carry. Yes the hammer is cocked with one in the Chamber. But you have a lever safety and what is called a secondary grip safety. If one has the lever safety off you can still pull the trigger as long as you’re not griping the handle and it won’t fire.

I own a Springfield 1911 .45ACP
Glock 17C 9mm
And I have owned a sig P226 .357/.40

The Springfield is what I carry, and love .45ACP it’s the only way to drop what needs to be stopped.

Glock 17C 9mm great for accuracy but not safe for carrying because of the ported barrel. Go only with the regular standard barrels if you get a Glock.

I loved the Sig and plan on getting another one, but it has to be in .45ACP for myself. The Sig is what I would recommend as a double action. It does not have a safety, but with a 9 pound trigger pull if the hammer is decocked makes it safe enough. Also the auto decock lever dropes the hammer safely. Comes in 9mm, .357sig, .40, 45ACP. If you get for example a P226 in .357 you can also get the extra .40 barrel for it, and shoot bolth types of rounds when ever you feel the need.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by IcePlatinumSky »

Offline Ares

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Lieutenant Colonel
  • *****
  • Posts: 1146
    • View Profile
    • http://www.myspace.com/gtm2000
(No subject)
« Reply #26 on: June 27, 2007, 07:40:50 AM »
Quote from: "azstang66"
Walther PPK/s .380 auto

Super light, small, concealable, and Bond looking!
I have it "in the pants", and wear fitting t-shirts etc. and people are surprised if I tell them I'm carrying.
Even though .380 isn't as powerful as 9mm, when you get hit with any bullet, you tend to either turn and run, bleed, or cover your ringing ears.


i agree with the .380, but when it comes to weapons the Beretta 84 fits my hand much better than the ppk. 10+1 .380. whereas the  XD 3inch is 13+1....hmmmmm. oh, and it's a .45.

my first choice would still be the beretta. the XD is a .45 and all, but the beretta is still more easily concealed, on account of my size, i dont have a lot of room to work with. 5'6" at 140lbs. the XD is a little too fat to be concealed on my frame
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by Ares »

Offline Ganef

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Major General
  • *****
  • Posts: 2103
    • View Profile
    • http://www.coyotetactical.blogspot.com/
(No subject)
« Reply #27 on: June 27, 2007, 11:09:47 AM »
With a good holster any gun is pretty concealable. I am a skinny guy and I have my glock 19 in my waist with a tshirt covering it, it dissapears.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by Ganef »
"Well, ain\'t we a pair, Raggedy Man..."

Offline driver5

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sergeant
  • *****
  • Posts: 193
    • View Profile
(No subject)
« Reply #28 on: June 29, 2007, 10:35:36 AM »
Personally I ruled out the glocks based on their feel. Too clunky and square for me, the XD has a bit more ergonomic grip (not a lot, just a bit) that happens to fit my hands very well.  I don't worry about misfires because I only carry in a holster with a trigger guard, and I don't put my finger on the trigger unless I'm going to pull it.  I like the grip safety, but it wasn't a prime decider.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by driver5 »

Offline Ganef

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Major General
  • *****
  • Posts: 2103
    • View Profile
    • http://www.coyotetactical.blogspot.com/
(No subject)
« Reply #29 on: June 29, 2007, 10:48:45 AM »
Quote from: "driver5"
Personally I ruled out the glocks based on their feel. Too clunky and square for me,


If you dont grab the slide, the rest of it is pretty ergonomic.

One of the main things that I heard about the glocks versus other hand guns is the angle that your wrist is at when firing. With the glock you have to point more down because the handle is angled more than other guns (XD, USP etc..). But I dont care, I trust my glock, it is my friend.

When it comes down to it, handguns nowadays are like midsize/price cars, they are all about the same in reliability and price, some have a few  more bells and whistles than the other but all in all they work great and you realy cant go wrong with any of them.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by Ganef »
"Well, ain\'t we a pair, Raggedy Man..."